Zimmerman in Hiding

Hmm, maybe because other people saw the burglars, and not to mention, one was caught in the area with crap in his backpack, and he was black and arrested?

 

One only needs to google the prosecution affidavit ...

 

2 were seen but not caught.. They were black.. What about the other 5?

Burgleries are sneaky crimes.. WHO was watching?

 

So two black youth were seen and not caught and you are seriously asking why he was on alert for black youth? Seriously?

 

Like GZ you ASSUME they were all black.........

 

Like GZ you ASSUME they were all black.........

 

I could care less. If two were seen, then its safe to say two black boys were seen breaking into places in the neighborhood. Be on alert. Seriously, not so sure what point you are trying to drive home here. Are you saying those people were lying about the description? Its such a moot point.

 

Two ? Out of seven burgleries??????

 

I'll take your word for it.

Does that mean ALL the burgleries were black youth?

 

Well since I don't work for the State of Florida I am not privy to that evidence.

Well I did just that and all I could find was capture and arrest.

So since you think his application is not bias'd for whites as it has been in the past he is a racist. Please explain that line of thinking.

 

So if two white boys were seen breaking into places would it be ok to label every white boy as "suspicious".

 

How do you know they weren't black and wearing disguises?

 

That would never stop you from imagining all the evidence you need.

 

When Z supporters make BS claims they simply disappear from the threads for a few days then come back and project like Universal Studios on high quality crack.

 

Is this something you also imagined? Why not quote and address those comments? Zimmerman says he was confronted and attacked by Treyvon. We have the police reports of his bloody nose and head. We have witnesses confirming Treyvon on top of Zimmerman beating him.
This idea that Trayvon was attacked by Zimmerman is PURELY a product of your imagination. Our idea that Zimmerman was attacked by Trayvon is a product of the evidence made available.

 

Two out of two where they have a description of the suspects.

 

Nope. It would be like reports of two men wearing red baseball hats burglarizing neighborhood homes. Zimmerman would have also investigated a man with a red baseball hat wandering the neighborhood. Doesnt mean all burlaries are by men with red baseball hats. Doesnt mean Zimmerman is a bigot towards men with red baseball hats

 

Nothing wrong with Zimmerman being suspicious. NW and regular citizens call 911 every day all over the country..

They don't follow with a loaded gun and kill .. Remember, the police were on their way and Trayvon wasn't doing anything unlawful.

 

Still waiting for your evidence, facts not your assertions or maybe's or might have beens or seems to me, that proves beyond reasonable doubt Z atttacked T and that contradicts his statements. The evidence the investigator testified they do not have.

Oh and still waiting for you to quote him testifying that Z lied. Have you posted that yet?

 

Right here is a good example. You claim there are witnesseS saying they saw T beating up Z when in fact there is only one witness who claims Z was on the bottom of T but that was AFTER he talked to both Z and the cops and he has no idea who made the first move and couldn't even be sure it was a gunshot. Before that he didn't know anything except two guys were wrestling and it was too dark for him to recognize the cops on the scene but it was somehow bright enough to see who was on top of whom.

On top of that, you ignore the witness who was on the phone with T.

 

It doesn't matter if Trayvon threw the first punch...

 

Your conveniently left out that M threaten Z first when the fact remains M could have simply gone home.

 

It doesn't matter who threw their hands first but the witness on the phone supports the claim Z made the first move.

I already posted the fact the investigator said at the hearing they have evidence that contradicts Z's claims about what happened. It was in the link you gave for the hearing transcript so I quoted it directly from that.

What evidence do you have that T circled Z's vehicle for 48 seconds as you claimed?