UN official in 1972 (Maurice Strong): says: “Western civilization now is paying the price of its unmitigated arrogance towards nature” that the threat posed by environmental destruction cuts “across every aspect of human life” that “powerful forces” have been set in motion which, unless they’re “checked by an unprecedented display of global co-operation, will be no less destructive in the long run than any nuclear holocaust“ . UN official in 1982 (Mostafa Tolba): says the environment has deteriorated in the previous 10 years that governments must act or face disaster that lack of action will mean, “by the turn of the century, an environmental catastrophe which will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible, as any nuclear holocaust“ . UN official in 1989 (Noel Brown): says entire nations are in danger of being wiped off the face of the Earth if global warming isn’t reversed by the year 2000 insists governments have only 10 years to solve the greenhouse effect . UN official in 1992 (Maurice Strong): says that planet Earth is headed for an environmental holocaust declares that the time has come for world leaders to act . UN official in 2010 (Christiana Figueres): says human emissions must be reduced dramatically because “we don’t have another option” in the same newspaper article, the principle negotiator for Bangladesh says: “if we can’t deliver at Cancun…it will be unfortunate, it will be tragic, it will be a holocaust” (backup link) EPIC YAWN....... Ever notice that the only "cure" usually involves the USA sending money to everyone else.....see a pattern yet??
Mannie I do not care whether you believe me or not. Those are facts, anyone who cares to can verify them. If you are accusing me of lying it is incumbent on YOU to prove the lie. That is what America is all about..... At least before Obama.....
Which of these two statements accuse you of lying? As a matter of fact, I've tried to verify them. Guess what: the only place I've seen these statements is in RW blogs. And because I've seen so many quotes taken out of context by the RW nut jobs, no, I do not believe the statements.
As a matter of fact, I've tried to verify them. Guess what: the only place I've seen these statements is in RW blogs. And because I've seen so many quotes taken out of context by the RW nut jobs, no, I do not believe the statements. Manny, for the tenth time...I don't really care what you think. See the hundreds of people that view my posts. If just 10% of them THINK and check facts (without throwing them out simply because they do not like the way the sources vote) and say "Hummmmmm.....maybe there is something here then I have done something. That is my objective. You and the two or three other super econ fringe group on this site are background noise....like crickets....you cannot teach them a thing, and they will never change their song......
And if I get just 10% of the people reading your nonsense to realize the propaganda you and others like you spread, I will have accomplished my objective to expose your propaganda. So I don't care if you read, or even respond to my posts. But you know I'll be reading and correcting your posts.
So you should learn by this time where to look for the truth. Stop wondering away, you have found the place.
So, why don't you provide a few links that verify your POV, ones that are not known right-wing propaganda sites, it should be easy since you and others say the truth is out there.
How would I explain it to somebody how sees the phenomena of appearance of new spicies in the material world around him? It was MannieD not Inquisitor who claimed "As a matter of fact, I've tried to verify them. Guess what: the only place I've seen these statements is in RW blogs" I means MannieD, not Inquisitor. Inquisitor does not go to RW blogs. If Inquisitor wants to be enterteined, while having a flue, he goes to PF. It is MannieD one should ask about links to RW blogs MannieD is refering to. Understand? Yes? No? There is no phenomena of appearing of the new spicies in this material world ever observed, and I mean both micro and macro world. Such a phnemena exist only in heads of Obama supporters. It is all mental. And generally the idea is to argue OP if one disgrees, rather than just say - it is from Inquisitor, therefore it cannot be true. Understand? Yes? No? If you say it is from Inquisitor, therefore it cannot be true, you just declare that it is true and you have no objections.Understand? Yes? No?
Jeeeez. Ok here is the way reality works, a person starts a thread and makes claims, it is up to them to provide the factual data to support their statements or it is them that ends up looking foolish. Enough said.
Inquisitor did not start the thread. Inquisitor pointed that since MannieD found factual data supporting the OP on RW sites only, he should stay there. Inquisitor does not need to go on left or right sites. Inquisitor is old enough to get tired of predictions made by UN, IPCC and overwhelimg majorities of the scientific community. Inquisitor does not need to demand anybody to provide factual data supprtinmg statements that sky is blue and it is not falling. Foolish are those who demand links proving that black is balck and white is white.
very strange...but typical of someone who thinks they're the world authority on everything, they're so full of themselves they don't realize how little they know ...it's the Dunning Kruger Effect in the extreme...
Look above: http://www.politicalforum.com/envir...caust-again-again-again-2.html#post1062389665 How would I explain it to somebody how sees the phenomena of appearance of new spicies in the material world around him?.... Don't you and wyly and other believer see the phenomena of appearance of new spicies in the material world around you?
If there is such a moment when you you are not in the process of intoxicating you brain look what is the post you quoted is about.