You don't what you're talking about. The autopsy report is consistent with the big hole on the rear. That's why you never post any evidence because it doesn't support anything but a shot from the front.
The x-rays show his right forehead missing. Did that happen or were those just altered to match certain Zapruder frames?
Were you being serious when you said it has always been clear? You agreed with a statement that it was clear that the man directly in front of Kennedy ( which was Connally ) shot Kennedy. Connally was also shot or did you not know that?
Serious sane people realize that "the person in front of Kennedy" is meant to apply to someone outside of the presidential limousine. That you would even raise this point shows you aren't worth the time it takes to say get lost.
Wrong again " the person in front of Kennedy " was not the statement you were agreeing with. The statement you were agreeing with was " the person DIRECTLY in front of Kennedy" That single word changes the whole meaning and that is what you agreed with. The person DIRECTLY in front of Kennedy was Connally and Connally was in the limo.
So you are sayingGovernor Connally shot Kennedy and Himself and did so with a movie camera filming him without the gun ever being visible on film. Ok how did he do this without any witnsses seeing him do it? How did he do this without the image being captured on the cameras recording his actions? How did he do this
exactly. its not good enough for him either that two of the main doctors who examined him along with many nurses there said in front on them that his head shot wound was caused by a HANDGUN FIRED AT CLOSE RANGE.pesky facts like that and witnesses seeing a gunman behind the fence firing a rifle and that the dallas doctors said his back wound was an EXIT wound and the throut wound was an entrance wound,thats too much logic and common sense for him to understand or comprehend obviously. he always plays dodgeball with those facts saying they arent true of course knowing he is cornered.
dude hundreds of people figured that out YEARS ago.do yourself a favor,go on to someone who is willing to learn,listen,and not ignore facts of conspiracy.
No one said he was shot with a hand gun at extremely close range. Even if they did we know he was not shot in such amanner because it is on film and noone at extreme close range held a hand gun. No one examined his back wound in Dallas. Those are facts what you claim are fictional tales - - - Updated - - - Hundreds of people believe it however none of them have produced any evidence to prove it. Oswald shot Kennedy alone and that is proven fact you cannot refute.
this is the most accurate post on this thread.thats how you can tell they are those kind of people that he mentioned because unlike people just in denial,like this one poster with the initials smw who lives in texas,she just laughs and runs off knowing she is cornered.she is pals with bush so its no surpirse she also supports the lie of the warren commission.however the magic bullett theorists who always post one lie after another when they know they are defeated,they indeed have a certain task they have been assigned to at sites.its so obvious since they always have to lie all the time and bltantly ignore facts that prove them wrong.
No one has lied except you and the other conspiracy buffs.' It is you guys ignoring the facts and you guys who have been proven wrong. And you know it