Nonsense. This claim is parallel to the one that vaccines caused autism. That one was thoroughly, totally debunked. Anti-vaccine activists are math-challenged, don't understand the difference between correlation and causation, and cause a lot of real harm. More nonsense. Why do you think the polio vaccine was developed in the first place? Because polio was a huge problem. http://www.post-polio.org/ir-usa.html The first polio vaccine was introduced in 1955. The year before it was introduced, the U.S. saw about 38,000 new cases of polio. By 1957, the number of new polio cases had fallen to 5,500. In 1973, the U.S. experienced just 7 new polio cases. Saying the polio vaccine causes polio is simply idiotic.
I am not a PHD but many of my colleagues are, I have however an extensive experience in reading and critiquing research - especially medical research and I am telling you that if "natural news" ever included a true, valid and rigorous scientific study in anything they publish it would be crying for loneliness and cherry picked to a fare thee well
Here is one of your colleagues that would disagree with you. http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2012/bcr-2012-006879.abstract
There is a vast difference between a case study and a research report Now even IF this were a side effect of the vaccine we have a possible (not proven correlation even in the case study) but possible adverse outcome of at present, perhaps 6 instances out of how many vaccines world wide???
This study was published in 1995 about what these vaccines were doing to cattle. It looks like you Aussie's own the vaccines that causes infertility. Maybe that's why you are defending them??? http://books.google.com/books?id=vC9rdThp2fUC&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=vaccines+have+hormones+in+1995&source=bl&ots=PMKQq4xl-F&sig=d8r52ntNXM66BIukq_z0ZzCJP88&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9D1-VLTbLoOhNviagrgI&ved=0CCUQ6AEwBA
Mandatory vaccines violate the Nuremberg Code, a set of medical ethical standards created due to the horrors of nazi experimentation of humans. "Safety testing of many vaccines is limited and the data are unavailable for independent scrutiny, so that mass vaccination is equivalent to human experimentation and subject to the Nuremberg Code, which requires voluntary informed consent;" Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
Ask your vaccine promoting health care provider, to show you the double blind studies, or any long term study, that shows that the particular vaccine confers immunity to the disease it is supposed to. You have the right to know the effectiveness of each vaccine you use, and to consider its effectiveness in light of the known side effects. You will find that no such study exists for any vaccine. The claims that vaccines work are not based on scientific facts
Mercury is good for you! - US Mainstream Media Report, HOW Here is the media lying saying mercury is good for people. Justification for putting it in vaccines.
This is letter from two doctors that lost their son to cancer. http://www.ouralexander.org/burton.htm VACCINES CONTAIN KNOWN CARCINOGENS If you call the American Association of Pediatrics and ask them what is the safe dosage of mercury derivatives, aluminum and formaldehyde to be injected into an infant, they may suspect child abuse. After they have calmed down, they will explain that there is no safe dosage because these are all potentially carcinogenic substances. But mercury derivatives, aluminum and formaldehyde are ingredients in most vaccines. How is it possible that they're safe? The answers depends on who is injecting them. If you or I inject our child with mercury or formaldehyde we are going to jail. But if a drug company and a doctor inject the same chemicals then they are perfectly safe.
Still not a research paper, And the whole thiomersal idiocy is just that Thiomersal was taken out of many vaccines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal Do you know how many people world wide have been vaccinated and how many of them have adverse long term effects?
What is strange about it. You think vaccines are safe. Give them to your children. May they reap what you have sown.
Nothing is completely "safe" but it is by an enormous degree safer than the diseases they guard against This next photo is of TB victims - suffering from Phthisis
You might well benefit from anti-psychotic meds, such is the depth of your paranoid delusions over vaccines..
I am not against vaccination. I'm for oversight of the vaccines to insure that foul play is not at hand, and for actual studies to be done and published for anyone to read. If that is crazy or makes me a monomaniac then so be it.
Studies HAVE been done - do you want some links? Have you never seen the VAERS reports? http://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index
I tried to download a report but it would not work for me. It said it started the download but it's not anywhere on my device. It's been over 20 minutes since it said starting download. From what I can tell this site is for reporting problems with vaccines. So what do these reports prove and how are they checking the vaccines for contamination?
What they record is ALL adverse events following vaccination - including car accidents http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/vaers.html
Would not contamination show up as an adverse event?? Of course it bloody would - which is why the drug companies will NOT risk it in America
These reports only go back to 1990. All the people I know with infertility problems were vaccinated in the 70's and 80's, I know a lot of women that can't bare children because the embryo won't attach to the womb. Some how my 1st 5 relationships were with women that had this problem. I'm sorry you trust the government to look out for your best interest. I on the other hand will be very skeptical of them and doctors. After all doctors are nothing more than legal drug dealers. Prescribing amphetamines to children, and handing out opioid prescription's like it's candy to anyone with a little pain.
There is so vaccine induced polio! http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/polio-vaccines-now-1-cause-polio-paralysis