White South Africans Are Preparing For “Removal of All Whites Within Five Years”

How TF do you think agriculture is measured? Nothing more ridiculous than a leftist pretending to have actual, technical knowledge of ANYTHING, as you prove with such asinine posts.

Rhodesia was the greatest agricultural success in African history...and then they kicked out the white people. NOW LOOK AT IT.

Keep trying to dance around yet, another Real World reality that completely crashes the leftist narrative...it's funny to watch.

 

Try reality:



Ian Smith has sadly been proved right

"...The sensible chap",(Mugabe) in fact, turned out to be the type of African leader that "good old Smithy", as his supporters called him, had campaigned against throughout the UDI years. He became the embodiment of corrupt, violent, amoral African dictatorship - just as Smith had warned his supporters.

Let us not forget the context of Smith's determination to hang on to white rule in the 1960s.

At the time that he claimed to be defending "civilised standards", Rhodesians had already witnessed the flight of Belgian refugees from the Congo; Idi Amin had trashed Uganda, and Mobutu Sese Seko was about to introduce an even more brutal and dysfunctional regime in neighbouring Zaire; immediately to the north of Rhodesia, Kaunda's Zambia was in a mess, riddled with corruption and economically mismanaged, and Malawi was being similarly misruled by the eccentric despot Hastings Banda. So why, Smith argued, would Mugabe be any different? Why, indeed.
Although the first 20 years of Mugabe's rule saw a slow, somewhat even-paced decline, the calamitous collapse has been achieved in little more than half a decade, an extraordinary feat of self-destruction when one considers that it took more than a century for Ian Smith's white antecedents to carve a modern, functioning, European-style society out of raw African bushveld.

But that has been the story of post-colonial Africa and, although this week's obituaries will largely dismiss Smith as a colonial caricature, a novelty politician from another age, if you were to go to Harare today and ask ordinary black Zimbabweans who they would rather have as their leader - Smith or Mugabe - the answer would be almost unanimous. And it would not be Mugabe.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3644217/Ian-Smith-has-sadly-been-proved-right.html

 

Your anger is affecting your rationality. Yield is a measure of production per hectare.

Please don't thank me for fixing your misfiring Grok.

.

 

Sorry you are clueless about what you are posting, and have deluded that you "googled" your way out of it.

Rhodesia had the highest yield in African history under Ian Smith. They exported as much food as the rest of Africa put together.

How're they doing now, under black African rule?

Thanks for proving my point.

Here, maybe this can glow through the intense density:

Zimbabwe, once a breadbasket, now a basket case under Mugabe

Mugabe blames sanctions, drought and former colonizer Britain for the collapse of an economy based on exports of a wealth of agricultural and mineral products.


Others blame land grabs over the past several years in which Mugabe encouraged blacks to violently force out most of the 5,000 white commercial farmers who owned 40 percent of all agricultural land that produced 75 percent of agricultural output.

White farmers had employed the country’s largest work force and their ejection led to the displacement of 300,000 families. The farms, most given to Mugabe relatives, allies and cronies, lie fallow today and Zimbabwe does not have the foreign currency to import food.

The World Bank estimates it would take more than 20 years for Zimbabwe’s economy to return to levels in 1980, when the country was considered the breadbasket of the region.

One in four Zimbabwean children have been orphaned and more than 2 million at risk of starvation, the U.N. Children’s Fund said.


http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/zimbabwe-once-a-breadbasket-now-a-basket-case-under-mugabe/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get it yet, Einstein? The same is getting ready to happen in South Africa, and is already starting.

 

Thanks for comparing me to Einstein.

UK was responsible for the misgovernment of Zimbabwe as a colony.

UK reneged on a promise of payment for land redistribution. Most of that money would have gone back to UK anyway.

Zimbabwe is a case of bad governance by colonial power UK. One dictator, Ian Smith, was replaced by another, Robert Mugabe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mugabe

 

Keep making up nonsense. Mugabe took over the Jewel of Africa, and destroyed in 20 years. There were no problems with food or the economy under Smith.



Let us not forget the context of Smith's determination to hang on to white rule in the 1960s.

At the time that he claimed to be defending "civilised standards", Rhodesians had already witnessed the flight of Belgian refugees from the Congo; Idi Amin had trashed Uganda, and Mobutu Sese Seko was about to introduce an even more brutal and dysfunctional regime in neighbouring Zaire; immediately to the north of Rhodesia, Kaunda's Zambia was in a mess, riddled with corruption and economically mismanaged, and Malawi was being similarly misruled by the eccentric despot Hastings Banda. So why, Smith argued, would Mugabe be any different? Why, indeed.
Although the first 20 years of Mugabe's rule saw a slow, somewhat even-paced decline, the calamitous collapse has been achieved in little more than half a decade, an extraordinary feat of self-destruction when one considers that it took more than a century for Ian Smith's white antecedents to carve a modern, functioning, European-style society out of raw African bushveld.

But that has been the story of post-colonial Africa and, although this week's obituaries will largely dismiss Smith as a colonial caricature, a novelty politician from another age, if you were to go to Harare today and ask ordinary black Zimbabweans who they would rather have as their leader - Smith or Mugabe - the answer would be almost unanimous. And it would not be Mugabe.


Keep dancing. It's funny. Whites running Rhodesia = plenty of food for EVERYONE. Blacks running Zimbabwe = starvation and poverty. Same with every other post-colonial black African takeover...EVERY ONE.

PRODUCTION COLLAPSES.

Keep making asinine excuses. As I said, the sensible/honest here are dying reading it.

 

Moon landing hoax returned almost 4 million results. So the number of results decides truth now? Why hasn't any major news source reported on this human rights violation?

Google will search for those words out of order and may even return results with some of those words missing and a lot of results at the very back will have nothing to do with it. Page 5 is when you start getting bad results. You start getting results like this:
10 Photo's that will inspire you not to travel South Africa
White Americans Are The Biggest Terror Threat In The United States
Impatiens: How to Plant, Grow, and Care for Impatiens Flowers | The ...

If you actually put it in quotes to search for an exact match you get only 13,000, and the 6th most relevant result is this thread with the rest being small internet sites. Why do you go to these trashy internet sites for your news? You know they are just posting inflammatory fake news to get views and for you to see their ads.

 

I'm not sure what that question means. Who are the "they" you are talking about? I was talking about the indigenous people of the South Africa 500 years ago. Are you asking if they were white? No, if that's what you meant.

 

I do remember Mugabe being a cause celebre for the left during the 80's. They always pick he winners!

 

Especially when they are the ones who destroyed it in the first place.

 

I was in the formerly prosperous country once known as Rhodesia a few months ago. The infrastructure is run by Whites and East Indians. There would be no aviation at all if it wasn't for Whites. The once rich farmland that was south of Harare is now desolate, fallow and for the most part abandoned, all because the Blacks lack the ability or resolve to work the farms. An analogy is our inner cities.

 

More justification for racism from a predictable source. I see you ran away when I posted the actual screenshot of your racist quote you claim I "lied" about.

 

The old shuck and jive didn't work quite as well as he thought it would. I've been all over Sub-Saharan Africa and the biggest question remains how could "they" screw this up so bad?

 

I guess this is turning into a rally now. So now you are Marlin Perkins.

Don't worry I believe the known liar has doctored up something.

 

Now you're into the old soft shoe. Africa is a universal craphole. The continent was much better off when run by Whites.

 

Is it like he never said "may".

 

LOL So now you are claiming the screenshot of your exact words is doctored up?

So let's review.

Here is the screenshot.



And here is the link to your racist quote

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?posts/1064776618/

Your days of dishonesty about this are over. You've been exposed for your consistent and predictable racism once again.

 

BS, you've never been there. I have. Rhodesia was fully self sufficient in food. And BTW that's what a breadbasket does. They EXPORT food. Just more liberal foolishness on your part. You don't have a clue of what you're talking about.

 

Amazi ng when you post the full context of the conversation.

Now I missed the part where I claimed it was ok to murder anyone.

Are you saying that parable out of the Bible is racist.

Are you denying that a man doesn't reap what he sows.

 

Not the quote. I see you are so desperate you are quoting yourself elsewhere to get away from your own racist quote I linked to that you claimed I "lied" about. Pathetic.

Which I never said. Try again.

Of course its in the Bible but you used it to justify employing racism against whites by kicking them off their own land.

There is no justification for your words. You're busted and you've been exposed. Deal with it.

 

Is it their land if it was stolen from someone else.

There is plenty of justification for it. You probably didn't have a problem with Jim Crow segregation, but now you say well it probably would have ended without a movement.

 

"In New York from January to June 2008, 83 percent of all gun assailants were black, according to witnesses and victims, though blacks were only 24 percent of the population. Blacks and Hispanics together accounted for 98 percent of all gun assailants. Forty-nine of every 50 muggings and murders in the Big Apple were the work of black or Hispanic criminals."
Source: http://humanevents.com/2013/07/19/black-americas-real-problem-isnt-white-racism/

 

So an opinion piece by someone who has probably never been to NYC is who we should be listening to.

 

Dr. Greg Stanton, founder of human rights group Genocide Watch who accurately predicted the Rwandan genocide in 1994, warned that the increased killings of white farmers in South Africa are being carried out for the sole purpose of extermination and seem to be directed by government elements, Roche noted.
“In other words, our [South African] government is at least tacitly complicit in these astronomical crime rates,” he said. “State-sponsored genocide, one arm’s length removed.”
“And he [Stanton] explained how he believed it was a low-intensity conflict to erode the periphery of the white population as a preparation for something bigger.”
Following anti-white rhetoric made by South African president Jacob Zuma last March, where he called for confiscating white-owned land and breaking up white-owned businesses, Roche said that it’s time for white South Africans to prepare themselves for civil war.

 

Black people are not native to the U.S. so they should live in Africa.