Irrelevant. Are you going to base your opinions of the danger women face on the experiences of a single woman? No? Then why would you do so for men? I didn't say I was more "vulnerable", I said I was more likely than a woman to be the victim of violent crimes such as murder. Whereas a woman may be more likely to be sexually assaulted on her way home, a man is more likely to not make it home at all. https://www.libraryindex.com/pages/446/Victims-Crime-CHARACTERISTICS-VICTIMS.html ...but again, I refuse to live in fear because of this reality. As I'm not an extremist like yourself (and as I actually looked at the crime stats), I don't believe that they have to be (in general) more guarded in the first place. Not in America anyway. According to who? How many times has the "she was asking to be raped" defense actually worked in a court of law? Well, you obviously believe women (completely without the input of the father) should have the final say. And you somehow come to the conclusion that you are seeking equality rather than supremacy. Hell, I even debate the flat Earthers, and I surely don't take them seriously. When patently absurd ideas are being espoused, I feel compelled to challenge them. Well, I guess you gotta keep the indoctrination going. I'm sure you brought up the incredibly self-serving and dishonest Lewis' Law to convince your workshop that feminism still has important business (like internet comments they don't like) to deal with.
LMAO. Nice try at psychoanalyzation. But I'm happily married and have no problem with "strong" or "successful" women, only with the crybullies who are living in the 70s. Well, I don't know you that well. But if people keep telling you that...
Isn’t the internet great? You can say you’re happily married to a strong and successful woman while all you do is put them down. I’m married too but having an affair with George Clooney. It’s true.i got bored with bobby Redford. About the description of feminists.....why would you think people told me those awful things? Never mind, I know why. That’s just the classic mysoginist response stereotyping feminists. But we all know men who attack feminism all have very teeny penises (sarcasm alert)
That's your point of view .....shrug .... I am sure you think that anyone who challenges really ignorant , old fashioned, stagnant, sexist BS is paranoid..... """"oooooh, the woman spoke out of turn , she must be EVIL! EVIL I TELL YOU!!""""
That's only because the "men" you love are pointyheaded latte sipping effeminates. Not real men who are providers and protectors.
Oh my what could be worse...men who share traits yucky women have. ....and they are providers just like women. I hope you don’t have children. Real men don’t write such sexist crap, they have self condiemce.they don’t have a need to put down women and the men who respect them. Oh well, it’s your problem...it’s called insecurity.
The format is like this (except that I am substituting { } for [ ] so that this reply doesn't appear as separate quote boxes, and you can sort of see "behind the curtain" of the HTML). {quote}First paragraph, sentence, or point that you want to reply to{/quote} Your reply. {quote}Second paragraph, sentence, or point that you want to reply to{/quote} Second reply. etc.
Actually, I never said I was married to a strong and successful woman. I said I am happily married, and that I have no problem with strong, successful women. Now, I'm not saying she isn't strong either (well, physically she's totally not) or successful (she works as a lab tech in a hospital, soon moving to billing and coding, and makes decent money. But "success" is a somewhat subjective term, so make of that what you will). Now, you're free to believe that I'm making all of that up, but I hardly see how a description of my modest life is in any way comparable to a claim of screwing movie stars.
This reply is also to FoxHastings (as you two are tag-teaming me anyway), because of her response to this. I am happy that you share this with your workshop, so long as you provide the full text of this conversation, so that my argument is not misrepresented.
Tag teaming YOU? Don’t flatter yourself....we’re responding to the few of you who demean women. Luckily there’s not that many who think as you guys do.
One more question...how do you delete something you just sent. I thought it would be under edit. I am just used to the other board I’m on
Equality is in the best interest of all not considered equal. It is actually in the best interest of everyone even if they cannot see it.
Face it, your misandry is showing right here. Real men who will defend their wives and families to the death, who will provide a good, safe environment for their families, who will teach the Word of God to their children? Those men you hate.
Unless they're white Conservative Christians, then discriminate away with impunity. Leftist hypocrisy and intolerance.
Facts. Like the Christian baker who refused to serve the homosexual "couple"? Or how about Hobby Lobby who won the SCOTUS decision. Sorry, but Leftism fails on all fronts.
I see....so it is only persecution or discrimination if it goes against your religious beliefs and is actually okay when your beliefs lead to discrimination? That is a complex of persecution. There also no "War on Xmas", Gays aren't plotting to corrupt your kid, Atheists have no religion, Evolution is real and Noahs flood did not create the Grand Canyon.
Got the Communist talking points down I see. And yes, there is an agenda to create SPECIAL "rights" for homosexuals.
It is clear you do not wish to actually discuss this or reflect upon your positions so I bid you good day.
Nothing to "reflect" (translation: compromise the Truth). I will never compromise on God's absolute truth, PERIOD!!