BREAKING : Florida School shooting, 20 injured.

Then explain how making the legal purchase limit the age of 21 will stop mass shooters under 21.

There is an age limit of 21 for handguns in most states.

Does that stop 14 year old MS13 members from killing people in the US?

 

It won't

 

Why are you asking me such strange questions

 

It might be because you said we need more laws.

Clearly you believe that more laws will solve the problem.

You just can't explain how that works.

 

You are being very silly. You are saying that laws don't work?

 

How many laws did the Florida shooter break, and how many chances did the government have to take guns away from him before he shot up the school?

 

You seem to be confused and I think it is because you are biting chunks that are too big. Let's take it one step at a time. Answer my question: Do you think laws do not work? I am pretty sure that is what you told me but I want to be sure first before the next stage of the debate on the worth of laws and how they pertain.

 

Too big? Looks pretty simple to me.

No, the laws did not work. If they did, the Florida shooting would not have occurred.

Is that the argument?

Since the double digit numbers of laws that were broken failed to stop the shooting, you need more law and less freedom?

 

How about the terrible damage done by the 1st Amendment that allos violent ideo games and hollywood movies go be shown to children?

 

I was right. You are confused that is why I am asking you a more simple question but you still have not answered it: Do you think laws do not work? It's a simple question. "Yes" or "No" is good enough. Are you afraid I am trying to trap you?

 

The laws did not work, that's how he got a gun in the first place.

Any other simple questions?

 

And allows Muslims to preach hatred and violence?

 

You refuse to answer the question probably because you sense danger.

 

Oh but I did answer.

I said the laws didn't work.

Are you saying the laws did work?

I'm not the one in danger here. Keep playing.

 

I've made my point already and your side-stepping proves it.

 

As governor Scott probably has the power to require the legislature to remain in session until this is passed.

 

Asinine whataboutism deflection based upon a complete FALLACY!

 

No, not at all but it is a comfort to me.

I happen to have an AR-15 and it has never killed anyone as that is not its intended purpose unless it kills in self defense.

 

Here's more:

 

Thank you tacitly admitting that the intended purpose of an AR-15 is to kill.

The motivation of the owner is irrelevant to the point that gun manufacturers must be held account for the deaths and injuries their products have caused.

 

I see that the cowardly, pro-gun bimbos are now terming the purpose of assault weapons as ”for self-defence”. Their English must not be too good as they are called "ASSAULT" weapons, duh. But I suppose they will be telling us that the Parkland shooter was in fear for his life and that the terror in the eyes of those students was a ruse just so he’d let down his guard in order for them to pounce upon him and tear him to shreds. Self-defence, right? These gun freakies have absolutely no courage at all. Not only does the wind frighten them, but they even tremble in fear of truth and fact. Being born with brain defects is an unfortunate condition that needs sympathetic understanding, but these voluntary cerebral wackos should not be allowed within sight of anything as dangerous as a ballpoint pen.

Guns! Guns! Guns! More guns!

 

Not at all

The NRA didnt kill those kids

Hollywood and liberal culture of death killed them

 

Link to that text please. In the text it says Miller not Heller.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

 

Repeating an asinine fallacy does not alter it from being an asinine fallacy.