A German physicist named Heinz Pommer has carefully explained and demonstrated how when all the available evidence and facts are considered, the only possible conclusion is that nuclear events happened at WTC. Veterans Today tells the story and paints the big picture, and it is fascinating how Pommer became involved when he did. https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/...an-no-longer-be-ignored-it-is-killing-us-all/ Gage would do well to listen, Bollyn too.
Did this topic set off alarms in your computer? Too Much Truth alarm? No, it's a series of small lectures by a physicist, so that may exceed your pay grade right off the bat. Nonetheless, if it's not over your head you will get several dozen small lectures as physicists do, explaining what is actually happening in the pictures we have all seen. And his analysis of 16 years worth of government pronouncements about what had supposedly happened. You might need your seatbelt on to watch the man explain what the facts mean. Letting Mr Occam rule, the reason the aftermath of the towers coming down looked like a nuclear bomb had gone off there is because a nuclear bomb or two DID go off there. Herr Pommer deduced scientifically many years later exactly what conspiracy theorists of the "Most Radical" species, men like Jeff Prager, were saying. Once again, conspiracy theory became conspiracy fact.
Always find out the source of your 'facts'...which is what I did...alternative facts...designed for the gullible...and working as intended.
Why was another thread started on the same topic? http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-center-on-9-11-–-an-empirical-review.560883/
I think 9/11 was at the very least, known about and allowed to happen, and possibly promoted to happen either by a deliberate shutdown of investigation or possibly even destructive devices placed in the buildings to ensure a desired result. By why on earth would nukes be used, when conventional explosives/incendiaries be just as effective and far more logistically convenient?
Dimitri Khalezov is easily found on the internet, and he might explain for you why nukes were used instead of conventional explosives. To me, it doesn't really matter much why. All that matters is that all the facts and evidence support the nuclear case. This new report from VT explains much, including the qualifications of Prager and Smith. I have read a fair amount of their writings and explanations.
your linked article is just propaganda and contains zero evidence, never mind even a synopsis or links thereto ... from the article ... it has already been well documented that the automobiles over a mile away had been towed from the immediate area of the towers to allow emergency access to the crime scene ... once again, another clueless "expert" pushing false narratives ...
No, the propaganda is offered by the state. The evidence for the nuclear theory abounds. The evidence for the official fable is non-existent.
I haven't read it all yet Bob ... I will comment when I am done reading ... yep ... those are the ones ...
by the way Bob ... your link to the Hulsey draft report doesn't work ... I had to go elsewhere to find it ...
What about those cars? Their damage is consistent with some sort of neutron bomb going off nearby. Office fires on the 80th floor cannot do that, and neither can thermite or other HE.
I already assessed that, so why did you criticize Hulsey's point about the studs when you didn't have a clue what he was referring to and didn't understand the issue? Knee jerk OCT devotion? I can hardly wait lol. The video below might also help. It must have been redirected. http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 http://ine.uaf.edu/media/222439/uaf_wtc7_draft_report_09-03-2019.pdf BTW, if you do have issues with Dr. Hulsey's draft report, I strongly suggest you email your concerns directly to him (and post it in the correct thread).
You mean like the Official Conspiracy Theory? "no one could have imagined" "it was a failure of imagination" "they did this because they hated our freedoms" and
I was thinking of nukes, secret particle beam weapons from space platforms. Or the planes were holograms. The conspiracy was the admin.allowed it to happen and took steps to provide the right environment to pull it off. Cheney was point man. The unsolved anthrax attack involved the same small group of treasonous conspirators . What it proved is how easy the people can be. fooled but not everyone. But you can holler tin foil hat and take care of these hard to fool people. And since fooling us is easy there will be more of the deceit from sociopaths
For me the only theory that has any consequence is the official conspiracy theory, all other theories are harmless. The OCT however has deadly consequences and is the only one that matters. That is only the reality that's evident. In other words, it's the tip of the iceberg. We don't know what lies underneath the surface, just that there is an even bigger conspiracy that we have yet to learn about. That depends who you mean by "us". It's quite obvious many of "us" are not easily fooled, especially not by known pathological liars.
of course ... but the question won't be answered by the troofers who believe in such nonsense as "mini nukes" ... have you seen the threads where troofers argue for pyroclastic clouds? ...
Welcome back Shiner. So you were "anxiously waiting" for the Hulsey draft report last I heard from you. Did you get past the first sentence yet? I haven't seen your critique so far, is it that difficult to read?