I was seriously wondering about this. I'm saying this because I find the political divisional numbers in this world just 'too odd'. In the American election we had a 50/50 balance of Hillary v.s Donald Trump, Donald only barely getting the majority, in the Brexit election we had a 52% leave v.s 48% remain. In the Israel election we're also stuck with a 50/50 division. What i'm saying is that we never get any number like 80/20 , and only rarely 60/40. It's almost asif politics just like gender is about 50% male and about 50% female and in some sort of state of balance, 50% leftist and 50% right wing.
You would have to look at the four temperaments; Guardian, Idealist, Artisan and Rationals. Maybe that might help.
lol no. However, I do admire your perception here. It's not a male or female thing. It's just what appeals to a person and if they think the candidate in front represents that. Which to be honest, it's way more insightful no matter which candidate or party you prefer.
If political preference were indeed genetically defined, and thus making it absolutely no different than matters of skin color, what would such a revelation lead to, especially with regard to the civil rights act, americans with disabilities act, and so many other pieces of legislation intended to protect against discrimination on such a basis? What would such do for arguments between conservatives and liberals, republicans and democrats, when each would have to be classified as a protected class of individual? What would become of politics when one is simply not allowed to attack another on the basis of their party?