WOW , that is quite different from her "value" ….…….and you have gone from "value" to "moral value" to "practical value' ..and when caught and challenged , changed AGAIN to """ It wouldn't make her any more of a human". LOL! You haven't address post 793
LOL! here's your tedious "define" this ploy. YOU define value....You are the one changing it from "moral value", which you couldn't explain, to "practical value" which you couldn't explain...to """ It wouldn't make her any more of a human".
Here's my complete post you just responded to : WOW , that is quite different from her "value" ….…….and you have gone from "value" to "moral value" to "practical value' ..and when caught and challenged , changed AGAIN to """ It wouldn't make her any more of a human". LOL! You haven't address post 793
No, you changed the words...you went from "value" to "moral value" and "practical value" and have NOT explained what you mean by either.
It's very simply really - what I MEAN is, her "value" as a human being is equal to the baby, but on a practical level, her life is more significant.
Says who? Oh, wait, did you mean fetus or baby? If "baby" then the discussion means nothing since this topic is abortion...has nothing to do with "babies" Well, of course it is, she's been BORN..
It is according to me. Exactly. That's why her life should be saved instead of the baby if her life was in danger. This we agree on.
Who knows? How would anyone know? What TF difference does it make? It is the woman's decision....what you or I believe is totally irrelevant.