White House Reporter Calls Press Secretary a "Lying B@#ch"

when he called himself son of a b? no...i do that all the time.

 

Yardmeat Translation: I don't want to post my citations because I've taken the events I've held up to be equivalent examples completely out of context.

 

When he talked about "moving" on a woman "like a bitch," or when he called protesters "sons of bitches" or when he called Chuck Todd a "son of a bitch."

 

If that is what you need to make up, then daydream away. You've already admitted that you won't truly address my first citation, so why post more? You have no interest in an honest discussion regarding them, as you've proven.

 

Yeah! Members of the media should be just as respectful of McEnany as Trump is of them!

Oh wait . . .

 

chuck todd isn’t a woman.

i was offended by the leaked audio of him and some friends from 19 years ago...it was locker room talk that he shouldn’t of said it...

i wasn’t often by him calling terrorist son of a bitches either they are for looting and murdering.

this is merely a female press sec being attacked with a sexist remark because she moved on from a reporter after she answered numerous questions but couldn’t handle the facts

more over calling so make a SOB doesn’t carry the same historic hate as calling a woman a B. Much like when a white man refers to a white kid as “son” a black person.

 

The secretary wasn't reporting facts. She was reporting lies. And you Trump called people sons of bitches for kneeling, not for looting and murdering.

 

How was she reporting lies again? By citing an article in the WSJ? What proof of her citation do you have that the WSJ article was a lie?

 

she was not reporting lies. She was talking about a piece in the WSJ.

and i’ve never called anyone a sob for kneeling...i have called the terrorist that

moreover the historical context of calling a professional and successful woman a lying bitch is vastly different then calling a group of terrorist or even football players SOBs. It’s sexist and met to make women be “put in their place” - i can’t see how anyone can defend this. g

 

As I said before: if she was saying that there was evidence of widespread voter fraud, she was lying. Maybe I misheard her.

 

Huh?

"defend" what?

A FAKE Narrative based on a fabricated "claim" based on an Unintelligible Audio?

What is there to "defend"?

 

See previous posts. And try not to make **** up. I said back in post #6 that she should be fired.

You're willing to vote for an open sexist, so I don't see why you are complaining, but I agree that it is sexist and she should be fired for it. As I said a few pages ago.

 

She was quoting an article in the WSJ. So now you're apologizing?

 

then don’t defend it...the audio was clear

 

The GOP gets into the act, but MUCH WORSE:

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...use-floor-for-accosting-ocasio-cortez.575746/

 

Please try reading: As I said before: if she was saying that there was evidence of widespread voter fraud, she was lying. Maybe I misheard her. I can post it a few dozen more times if that is what it will take to sink in. Quoting the WSJ doesn't mean that she isn't lying. Wouldn't be the first time she's misrepresented an article in order to lie.

 

no i am not voting for an open sexist..who gave you that idea? i am voting for the man that but this high successful woman in this position as PS, who’s be horribly attacked, repeatedly by leftist who don’t like her getting out of her place

then why do you continue to deflect from the situation? this has nothing to do trump.

 

Produce the audio.

 

NO, the audio WASN'T "clear" (and Everybody KNOWS that).

 

only those that chose not to hear

 

Yeah, it's not clear that's what was said. The reporter claims she said, OK, you don't want to engage. If you "hear" those words in your mind, then you don't hear OK, you're a lying bitch. More over, I suspect if the reporter said that in the room, the press secretary would have pounced on that as a great political moment. So the fact that she didn't and Trump didn't tells me it probably wasn't what was said.

IF it was said, it was unprofessional. I'm not sure what should happen. If you take away her credentials, what makes you think that will matter? Another so called liberal report who reports the facts, something you hate, will take her place. So no real win there. More over, the term "spew" is inaccurate as it connotes a large volume. One insult isn't spewing profanity. And since when did the right care about feeling insulted over someone expressing themselves? I like how you guys throw your so called ideals under the bus when it suits you. Reminds me that you have none and just like to pick, and then lose, fights.

 

Just curious, which party stole the 1960 POTUS election, and tried to overturn the 2016 election?

 

Fake news websites.

 

No one tried to "overturn" the 2016 election (no, that isn't remotely what the Russia investigation was about, if that is what you are going for), I have no idea what you are talking about with the 1960 election, and I'm not sure why you think any of this address what I said.

 

Ah... got it. So not apologizing... Do you have evidence that her characterization of the article from the WSJ would indicate it was inaccurate?