Have you seen this angry teacher chatting with students? She has a fit praising the cops. What would you do as a student.
1. It's a dupe thread http://politicalforum.com/index.php...captured-on-videotape.587597/#post-1072607804 2. It's daily caller. Come on. Get better sources.
I tried to change the post. First I had copied something done by a teacher. I later decided to post a volcano going wild and was not able to completely edit so the wild teacher showed up. I would like one of the Mods to move this teacher to the correct place.
I am shocked you decided to attack the source of the video as opposed to discussing how she handled things. What did she teach students. To hate Cops. To treat them as criminals.
Because it's daily caller, who is known for taking things out of context. Why would I care about the video, if the video is misrepresenting the teacher? Would you argue with someone who misrepresents your arguments again and again?
The video clearly is correctly showing what the Teacher said. I would not care if your RT source posted it so long as it is true.
RT? Come on I’m a BBC kinda gal. And just because the claim is there, doesn’t mean it isn’t taken out of context.
...Yeah. No duh. You're saying that like it's some epiphany. It's not. It's refusal to accept the common ground assumption of the OP.
No, it's not denial of facts but how the facts are being presented. If I say you have a bad source, why would I engage with the source?
You need to make the case that the teacher was deceptively edited/misrepresented. You need to do more than just cry wolf.
It also doesn't mean that it IS taken out of context... you are the one claiming that it is a misrepresentation. The burden of proof is YOURS... you need to support your claim. You can't just cry wolf.
it happens, even in churches, adults should know better than to lose it like that around children "Pastor: I punched a kid ‘as hard as I could’ for ‘not taking the Lord serious’" https://www.rawstory.com/2015/01/pa...d-as-i-could-for-not-taking-the-lord-serious/
The source is not Daily Caller... the source is the video... Daily Caller just happened to share that video...
The counterpoint is the post that got taken down by the mods. Starting ground demands a reason to trust the source. Why would I trust a mainstream media source when I know they're biased? Wouldn't it make more sense to start off on something both sides agree on? 1. I am going to respond to this because repeating your point 4 times is unnecessary. 2. If the source is the video... why not just cite the original video? That would actually help things out a lot. I don't have to go do the research to see if the video was deceptive or not.. because that's the job of the news article. If the article is suspicious because it has a history of misrepresenting things, then don't be surprised when I say how do I know the video wasn't deceptive? 3. "Daily Caller is a news and opinion website based in Washington, D.C. It was founded by Tucker Carlson, who later went to Fox News, and political pundit Neil Patel. It was launched in 2010 and dubbed “the conservative answer to the Huffington Post.” Ad Fontes Media rates Daily Caller in the skews right category of bias and as mixed reliability in terms of reliability."-so it's not a source you should trust, especially when there are better sources out there. https://www.adfontesmedia.com/daily-caller-bias-and-reliability/
You are making claims you don't even try to support, just a long load of babble is all you have to offer. LOL