No, I conceded because I did not want to continue down your path of insanity. There is a difference. I did not admit defeat, did I? You did educate me, but not about the thread topic. You educated me on how mad you are, not angry, insane. As you claim to be an intellect but show little to no qualities of one. If you were, you'd be inquisitive and be curious as to why I would have such an opinion, you'd question my opinion and ask how I came to formulate it. Instead, you'd rather state false, untrue and barely look at anything that you asked for or that I had provided. But rather than doing that, it's all brick walls and roundabouts. When you learn how to debate correctly, maybe we can do it again sometime. But for now, you were doing my head with your rubbish responses. When you eventually realise also, that this world doesn't have streets paved with gold. When this happens, if this happens, as I'm not confident it will for you, you'll see just about every major event had something sinister orchestrating it. As I stated before, I conceded not because of defeat, but your incessant mind-numbing arguments. For that, I lost many brave brain cells. I no longer wanted to play and be brought down to your level of consciousness. It was fun to a point. But just like drinking copious amounts of alcohol, you've got to know when to stop. I sincerely hope you got educated, but that I too am not confident it occurred. Thanks for the experience.
You are projecting. I debated correctly and crushed you I demonstrated and proved the weakness of yuour are argument and outright falsehoods in your poosts I did so with facts and evidence. You went in circles rehashing the same debunked crap Yes you conceeded and admitted defeat your premises are false and disproven and you now this Carry on Junior you have learned from your better
No. In your deluded mind perhaps, but it must be a mutual agreement, which it is not. agreemnet No. You demonstrated how you lack the ability to see both perspectives, not in an immature manner. You never provided any links to back your claims or to counter mine. So your arguments were all unsubstantiated. What facts, what evidence? All you provided was the video in the OP. You've shown no further evidence other than your claims, which have never been proven. Show me where I said, "I concede defeat". There is a difference between what you claim was stated and what was actually stated. Just for those who where asleep during the last lesson, I conceded because I no longer wanted to lose my mind with your insanity. How? You've never countered any of my claims with any explanation of how it couldn't have been possible. Stating that something is false or invalid means squat. That is not opposing an argument, that's just disagreement, not evidence to counter my claims. WTF? With everything I've stated above, you're far from my "better". What did you mean by "Deep Politics" in the thread?
Wrong. It is you willfully refusing to dsee both perspectives ad we both knows. you willfully turn a blind eye towards anything proving you wrong. For example you claim the Warren Commission report was rigged yet you never read it and have no clue what it contains. I stated facts ad evidence poving you wrong. We both know this. You created self defeating circular arguments. I am your better and you know this as does every one else. I have defeated tyou and you conceeded.Every thing you posted is fallacy and projection. You have been PWNED
Live your fantasy if that's what floats your boat. I dare you to come to the covid threads. You'll know then what being PWND is all about. Come on, I dare ya. Have you got the pair you suggest you have?
The simple fact is you. Your fantasy is that you think you've one. concede verb (GIVE AWAY) C2 [ T ] to allow someone to have something, even if you do not want to: The president is not expected to concede these reforms. He is not willing to concede any of his power/authority. Britain conceded (= allowed) independence to India in 1947. Are you educated now?
Tell me, show me even, where does it state any part of this "losing the argument"? You are a nutter aren't you?
I'm referring to this Do you understand? Do you get it? This why I called it quits is because are nuts.
Pipe dreams, just pipe dreams. Your inability to critically think, see and hear inconsistencies and connect dots is nonexistent. So, if you perceive to be superior in an argument, this one, how come you've never known about this? Hmm, super-sleuth you are. Listen to the findings, I'll give you a spoiler alert, the Warren Report has inconsistencies, but you didn't know that, I had to point that out to you twice now. Listen and watch this. Don't dismiss it, watch it and learn from it.
You prefer ignorance over truth, nice. Haven't watched it, hey? You wouldn't want to be proven wrong again.
You are displaying ignorance by not answering. You cannot name any siuch inconsistency because you fall for whatever you are told without fact checking. you do not search for truth but only restrict yourself to conspiracy theory nonsense. You have not proven anything wrong quite the opposite.