Yes, and I already stipulated that. The relevant scientific question -- in which you have not the slightest interest -- is how much. And the...
Bingo. Or interesting.
That expression is proof that you are just makin' $#!+ up. ^^^ My nomination for Unconscious Self-Reference of the Month.
The moment you use that term, you admit that you are just makin' $#!+ up, and have disqualified yourself from serious discussion. No, you have no...
He certainly has contributed almost nothing in the way of either information or entertainment in hundreds of messages on this topic in the last...
No, I identified established facts of climatology and atmospheric physics. I don't understand what people think is accomplished by calling facts...
He died in 1927, and his work on CO2's effect on climate was published in 1895. Arrhenius's calculation was based on the effect of CO2 in an...
The only one you can fool with your continual bluff and guff is just yourself.
There is no doubt that CO2 follows temperature in the paleoclimate record, proving that temperature affects CO2 more than CO2 affects temperature....
No, that is not a fact, unequivocal or any other kind. It is an assumption that is not based on credible empirical evidence.
No, you simply made that up, like almost everything you say.
But it's the top 1% in reported income, not the richest 1%, a fact I have told you repeatedly, but you refuse to admit. Most of those "top 1%"...
No, YOUR OWN GRAPH shows temperature fell from the early 1940s to the late 1970s while CO2 was rising rapidly, as I have informed you multiple...
As they say in Japan, "It's mirror time!"
<sigh> It changes the narrative because it proves that to the very modest extent that it might be happening, CO2 has little to do with it. And...
Separate names with a comma.
