Protest Conservatives This Fall: They Helped Force Gay Marriage On Your State

Well, you knew it was coming....a rant from the middle.



It only takes four votes in SCOTUS to hear a case. All it would've taken to prevent all of this was the four Conservative Justices voting to hear these appeals. But instead they chose to cave to an untested social trend born of the outspin of the groovy 1960s free-love cult. And in the end they have sacraficed the wellbeing of children on the altar of political pressures. Our conservative principles have finally been abandoned by the last bastion in place to preserve them... Vote accordingly... Independents anyone?

Just as all the LGBT cultees are doing, polygamists may now in any of the states with no legal marriage laws on the books [Courtesy of SCOTUS' de facto legislating-from-the-bench-by-refusing-to-hear-allowing-attrition "Decision]. Attrition not only applies just to LGBTs. ANY person so desiring to be married to any other person or persons in any of the affected attrition-states may marry. Could Polygamists Sue To Marry In California Right Now US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum



From this thread we have the below conversation:

9th Circuit Assumes Legislative Power In Same Sex Marriage Case Page 6 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

>>>MOD EDIT Rule 15 Violation Removed<<<

I would say that one test of any such law is how integral it is to Constitutional protections already longstanding and unquestioned. And further most recently reiterated by Windsor 2013. The right for states to self-govern with respect to HUMAN BEHAVIORS [verb] [not race, not religion, not country of origin or one's gender][nouns] is the most fundamental right of any state or its citizens/voters. Any question of law that challenges that right must not dominate it in the interim as those appeals go upward.



The default decision must always be the one that supports the most fundamental right of all: the right to democracy. The challanger has the burden. Just like any plaintiff, "the burden is upon you" to show how accepted foundations of law "must be overruled". This SCOTUS is not only de facto legislating outside its authority [by refusing to hear these most compelling cases...attrition...] but is actually dissolving the bedrock of the constitution in the interim.



What they've effectively done is eradicated any binding description of marriage now in any of these states. And as such, ANYONE can marry there RIGHT NOW. It isn't limited to just LGBT cultees swarming the county clerks' offices to 'marry their way into legality '. Polygamists, siblings, anyone...could march in and "legally" [since there are no laws now] demand a marriage licence. Turning them away would be arbitrary and discriminatory.



ie: By refusing to hear the cases, the SCOTUS has created a situation of complete lawlessness as to the most fundamental institution of our nation [marriage] and as such, the children will suffer. This was a calculated decision to legislate without making it look like they are legislating. They know that the attrition happening in the interim during the "convenient/effective limbo-legislation" is the same as a sweeping federal protection for gay marriage issued from the bench. And I hold the conservative Justices accountable since only 4 Justices were needed to bring this case before the Bench.



I'm rethinking my crossover voting as we speak...



Every Justice should hang their head in shame. This is why the most careful selection of the most unbiased, fair and wise man or woman selected for the seat of Supreme Court Justice should be one of the most exhaustive searches a President and Congress should do. Playing partisan politics is a byproduct of malignant capitalism and everyone grappling for dominance from whichever ilk they hearken from. And it is KILLING this country.



I get it. We're on the eve of a pivotal election. But this is beyond the pale. Unless the GOP has a last minute plan to pull up from this nosedive, my respect for the strong party [who knuckles under to gay pressures?] is in the TOILET. Playing partisan politics with our nation's most fundamental conservative institution [marriage] has rendered the conservative party as much of a common streewalking prostitute as any leftwing nutjob.



You made people angry all right. Especially when we know that it is, in essence, the fault of conservatives now and not those who "know not what they do" who forced us to hand off to future generations "gay marriage" and all the unknown but predictable outfalls of this.



We've seen the culture. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to extrapolate what this means for society, our children and our future...



THIS MARRIAGE vv BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE FOUR "CONSERVATIVE" JUSTICES AND THEIR POLITICAL PARTY OF "ROLLOVER AND TAKE IT"..





Enjoy kids!

 

Those pictures are funny...as if they aren't possible without gay marriage? Wild gay pride parades predate gay marriage. If anything maybe letting them get married will cut down on that.

 

Letting them get married also allows them lawsuits against adoption agencies. Might want to think about the kids before it's too late.

This isn't from a shift in public opinion by the way. Look at the polling results on the top of this page: http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...to-accomodate-for-homosexual-weddings.360777/

That 82% represents people who aren't really all that much about gay marriage, are they? Are people just going along with this without thinking? LOOK at those pictures in the OP here. THAT is the value system we are now assigning our orphans to. Sex in front of and with kids? Have we lost our collective mind? And REPUBLICANS sit quietly about this? Who are our conservatives?

 

The OP is missing the larger point.

It only takes 4 votes to hear a case so why didn't the 4 liberal appointed justices choose to hear it and make a definitive ruling?

Is it because they know they do not have a 5-4 majority on this issue and would lose?

The most logical conclusion to draw from the Courts decision not to hear the case is that the conservative Justices are waiting for the issue to be brought to them on some other issue so when they do make a definitive ruling it will apply in just the exact way they want it to.

 

The liberals didn't need to because they knew it would win by attrition. So no sweat for them...just sit back. It's the conservatives who are utterly shocking in their lassitude to act on behalf of clear majorities in nearly all the states to keep marriage to man/woman. It's pure sedition from the SCOTUS. It's almost worse than Citizen's United. I think they're tied for first place of "how the US fell". Dissolving separation of powers is no laughing matter. When SCOTUS de facto legislates by fostering attrition to laws it doesn't like, you might as well hand the controls over to Putin.

 

Idaho and North Carolina are now on the winning side! http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/11/us-usa-court-gaymarriage-idUSKCN0HZ2B120141011

Huckabee is so ticked off he wants to quit being a Repub! http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/11/1335765/-Saturday-nutpick-a-palooza-HUCKABEE-DON-T-GOOOOO

 

Where would Huckabee go

He can only be accepted in the republican party
he would have very little political power if he started a third party

 

I think it's more likely that the four conservative judges knew they wouldn't have Kennedy, so rather than give a definite constitutional seal of approval now, better to wait and see if the court's make up changes for the better after 2016,

 

I think its just wonderful! Huckabee leaving the republican party...talk about sour grapes.

 

Fascinating. I must say, Silhouette, I haven't run into someone like you for a while. Nice to see the genre hasn't disappeared.

 

Yes but you get my point.

I don't want to hurt conservative votes because I think we need to slightly trend that way for many reasons. Though I do not abide by the majority of GOP platforms. I'm a Clinton Democrat for sure. But if the conservative arm of the SCOTUS "tells the nation" where the GOP stands on giving a leg up to perversions being able to legally sue adoption agencies and ultimately put children in harm's way, I'll let the GOP know about it at the poll this November.

And I suggest you do too. They still have time to turn this around. But not much time... Instead of an October surprise for republicans, there may be a November surprise instead...