Nicaragua strengthens laws defending traditional marriage, rejecting gay unions/adopt

Now we are witnessing the great cake war.
I'm happy, sorry about the trouble makers.

 

What difference in your mind would it make since you believe it is already a part of the law?

 

In every case that's made the news, it's been in a State that protects sexual orientation. That not all do (yet) is irrelevant.

 

The liberals tolerate and observe human rights only as far as their definition goes at the U.N., a body wholly politicized. The U.N. think tanks have no concept of the human rights in the universal sense, but only attach the human rights clause to what ever agenda serves them best.

 

Actually, it renders your claim that

BS in 33 states.

 

That will be untrue by the end of the year. But if it makes you sleep better knowing it still is, even if only for a few more months, by all means lean on it.

 

Please tell me more about how it's okay to marginalized groups as long as you don't like them. If you could throw in a bit more about how everyone who disagrees is a left wing extremist, that would be great.

 

Oh I doubt that, but no one can deny a boy his hopes and dreams. And still, your claim is BS in this world, even if it is true in the word of the future you imagine.

 

Limiting marriage to men and women doesn't marginalize any group.

 

And back on ignore you go. You have proven more times than I change underwear in a year that you do NOT understand in the least the way our legal system works. Buh bye.

 

I know the legal system well enough to know that your prediction that discrimination against gays in public accommodation will be banned nationwide within the year is absurd.

 

It marginalizes those who cannot be attracted to the opposite sex.

 

Hobby Lobby?

 

Irrelevant. They were not given permission to discriminate, they were given permission to not offer 4 specific birth control options. I disagree with that decision, but it's off topic to this discussion.

 

And why were they given this right? What was they basis for their argument?

 

It's irrelevant. Come June same sex marriage will be legal nationwide, and before the end of the year discrimination based on sexual preference will be banned nationwide. If you don't like it, you can try Uganda or Iran. Ciao!

 

It is not irrelevant. It was based on religious freedom act.
I won't move, and I will never acknowledge adam and steve. However, if you forced a bakery to bake you a fruit cake for your choice, would you be in the least bit concerned about what ingredients would be put in your fruit cake? Just saying'...I never complain at a resteraunt about the food. The cook gets the last laugh, ya know!!!

 

It is irrelevant. Once sexual orientation is added to the Civil Rights Act (which WILL happen this year), religious or not, discrimination will be illegal.

It doesn't matter what you acknowledge or don't. You will, however, have to deal with the fact that the law does. Whether you like it or not.

Are you advocating attempted (or actual) murder?

 

Those are your words, not mine...Never mentioned anything remotely close. I was just saying that when people are forced to do something that goes against their freedom, forced to make a choice against their morality, I would perhaps feel a little concerned about just how clean that cake might come out. Again, and I used a cook as my example, i often think twice about sending my food back...Murder was never mentioned. Can't even think like that...

 

There exists no freedom to discriminate, quite the opposite. As for intentionally making a cake "dirty" (whatever that means), it's a contract violation, fraud, and potentially dangerous. Anyone who would do such a thing is the lowest type of scum, and I hope they get caught and hit up on criminal charges. Food service prep is a HIGHLY regulated industry, as I'm sure you know.

 

Odd that you talk about morality then with the same breath you say people should be "concerned about just how clean that cake might come out".

People should be arrested for serving purposely tainted food and barred from working in any occupation that deals with supplying a physical good to others.

Bigots and their self inflated sense of morality. Jesus would be so proud of you guys.

 

Jesus would be proud for those willing to stand up for their faith, and get hung, just as HE did for drawing a line as for what HE stood for. Hang me, I do not care. What you represent is deplorable and that's fine. We have guys losing their lives fighting for our rights. Religious freedom to not have to take part of a bankrupt choice, is one of what they fight for. we have a bankrupt leader, which is also why we have fallen so far in this world.

Enjoy your win..At the end of the day, the only way you get your way is through a sterile legislation that is all about pandering for votes. As much as you would love to believe that it's all about you, it's not. It's all about what is the latest PC correct item for the day that gets hussien and his ilk votes. Make no mistake about it. Deep inside, you know that you can't build a building with all screws or all bolts. Nature and science both know that it was and is all designed to have a male and female counterpart.

I remember the parades of loud and proud crying for someone to side with you and you couldn't stand to be told or forced to have to hide who you are. As soon as you finally get your sterile law to back you, how quickly you throw your "tolerance" issue by the way side...Hey, you got what you want, so who cares about those that represent a vast majority of this country!

 

Yeah. Because he was quoted in Luke as saying "Thou shalt poison people attending a gay wedding."

 

I know you like to put things in people's mouths, but I never said such a thing. Your "tolerance" is becoming..

 

You endorsed it, and don't try to pretend otherwise. You people disgust me, you are NOT in charge of society whether you like it or not. We do NOT make laws based upon your phony, inconsistent buybull. Uganda might be a good choice for you.