There it is folks...the reason that Trump threw his baseball cap hat into the ring in the first place. Just as many of us always said...it was always a stunt for the free publicity. http://www.aol.com/article/2016/08/...-from-the-washington-posts-new-book/21457199/ At least at that juncture I can choose not to tune in and avoid being forced into seeing his mug 24/7 on the MSM.
In fairness, the guy DOES have to make SOME plans for after the election is over. Playing himself in a movie. Travelling overseas to meet with his Boss in Moscow. Starting up "Trump TV" with an "exciting line-up of stars like...Eric Bolling, Sean Hannity...and the hilarious new sit-com 'I Love Katrina Pierson', staring media darling Katrina Pierson as 'Katrina Perez', wacky housewife married to an illegal immigrant from Cuba that has no legal status and she has to hide him in their Trump Tower apartment every week from the INS.....and hilarity ensues! 'Katrina, you got some 'splaining to do!!!' 'Waaaaaahhhh!'"
Parroted. Not said, parroted. And whats the substance here other than to appeal to the "haha Donald Trump had breakfast this morning" confirmation bias? Now here's the funny part. The show in question is called "The Tower" and it was conceived years ago with a few scripts written but never produced. A reporter, from a certain left leaning paper, brought up the production and asked if Trump would ever give it another try now that hes got even more source material to work with. His response: "Depending on what happens with this thing, I'd like to do that," he said. "Of course, if this goes all the way, I can't do it. I won't have the time. And it wouldn't be appropriate." Now your article is a classic example of media bias because it makes it look like Trump gathered up reporters and issued a statement saying "be sure to tune into my TV show next fall". Nah, a reported brought up a question all on her own and got an honest answer. Now what I'd like to see -instead of the dozen or so "haha Donald Trump had breakfast this morning" threads that spam this forum on a daily basis- is a Democrat voter asking: hey wheres Hillary, how come she doesn't talk to the press? Because while you guys are spending every waking second worrying about Trump's breakfast order Hillary is sitting there thanking Allah that you're more interested in pancakes than by her disastrous illegal corruption.
I see no redeeming talents or qualities, but we know that fame and fortune nowadays does not require much or any of those. We are in the era of reality TV where being obnoxious talentless and dumbed-down are prerequisites.
There's a few people here I'll rarely ever get a response from when I criticize them for having fallen for such obvious bait, and this might be one of those times. But in general I'd say that its just unbelievable how voter intelligence has reached an all time low this election to a point where something like a simple asked & answered question is grounds to launch into a hysterical bout of self aggrandizing herp-de-derp. I mean honestly what in the possible hell could be read into this question? You'd think no reporter has ever ask any politician what they'd do if they lose an election. There's that old adage "everyone becomes an idiot during an election" and its classic response of "no, everyone just gets treated like an idiot during an election". But I think this go round we've, sadly, got an equal dose of both going on.
Katrina Pierson, is she that black haired female woman Trump appologist who us dumber than a bushel of summer squash?
Well if he does get elected POTUS he can go and be a college president after he is done POTUSIZING .. Or maybe. Chancellor Of Trump University Dean of the School of Cons and Frauds.
UPI/CVoter poll: Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump hold steady in virtual tie. http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016...ump-hold-steady-in-virtual-tie/4241471961806/ Over the last week, Crooked Hillary is down 2.5: The Trumpster is UP 2.6!
Hope springs eternal... Who will win the presidency? Updated 43 minutes ago http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo
FIVETHIRTYEIGHT aren't they folks that said Trump only had a 2% chance of winning the nomination? And the same folks that just over 3 weeks ago said Trump would win? You might be better off studying the entrails of a slaughtered goat and seeing what that predicts.
Andrew Jackson making up things again? Unlike some, I KNOW I can't predict the future so don't pretend to have this ability.