Details of the last attack: http://www.moonofalabama.org/2016/09/us-launches-open-war-on-syrian-government-forces.html This should come as no surprise for those paying attention. Israel already admitted as much. Hillary, admitted in a leaked email that the war in Syria was for Israel. At what point does the mass awakening happen?
Australia was involved in the air strike. It was a regrettable mistake that Syrian forces were bombed. We were trying to bomb ISIS terrorists.
Awakening? Lol. Right. You quoted an unsubstantiated subjective opinion as if its evidence for your ridiculous allegation Israel and Al Quaeda are allied let alone Israel was in a bombing mission. What nonsense. To show just how ridiculous your claim is enjoy: http://www.worldjewishdaily.com/israel-blasts-al-qaeda.php Yah allies. Right. Here knock yourself out with reality Sam S: http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2011/12/israel_kills_al_qaed.php thejc.com/news/world-news/160881/al-qaeda-group-urges-attacks-israeli-olympic-athletes-rio http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-25852704 https://ca.news.yahoo.com/al-qaeda-u-embassy-attack-foiled-israel-says-192830573.html http://world.time.com/2014/01/24/fa...m-al-qaeda-israel-targets-online-battlefield/ http://www.thetower.org/breaking-al-qaeda-tracking-idf-patrols-on-golan-heights-video/ http://world.time.com/2014/01/24/fa...m-al-qaeda-israel-targets-online-battlefield/
MUST SEE VIDEO: TRUTH REGARDING SYRIA - NOT CIVIL WAR, BUT US INVASION US Peace Council Representatives CONFRONT a hostile American press after visiting Syria, and learning that the American people are being lied to, grossly lied to. [video=youtube;c8JppJyVxYU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8JppJyVxYU[/video]
Wasn't it mentioned that it was pairs of A10 and F16? Neither of those are used by Australia or whatever country took the blame on themselves. Also those planes approached from direction of airbase used exclusively by US. So, whitewashing clearly is involved... Also suspicious coordination with ISIS followup attack make it look like joint operation with air support, not "accident". And how comes that Russians weren't informed about that "operation", haven't they reached agreement on that?
Yes, obviously USA did this on purpose. Australia is just backing up our ally by saying that we were involved probably. And that was what I was doing. Australia is involved and in a coalition with USA on this though, and we are fully on board and supportive of the mission so any success or failure is just as much ours as it is Americas. We Australians are very solid allies. You could not have better allies or teammates than an Aussie. The reason the Russians were not informed is because we are $%$%ing with them. And we want them to know that and for there to still be nothing that they can do about it. 'Terrorists' bombed the aid convey claim the Russians? Oh, I thought that it was the US led coalition that is behind everything that terrorists do. That is what Russians were claiming the day before. Yet the next day they are bombing vital aid to Syrian refugees and killing innocent aid workers, and blaming it on 'terrorists'? Do Russians think we are stupid? Russians dont $%$% with us. We $%$% with them.
The US is back in the region, with 'boots on the ground' but neither Obama or Clinton want to admit it. Removing the troops from Iraq was the worst military decision in living memory and all done for the sleaziest of political purposes. http://www.wsj.com/articles/more-ground-troops-to-iraq-1474586777?mod=djemMER
I did not realize how nice it was not to hear 'boots on the ground' for so long. I havent been appreciating it at all. I havent heard anyone say 'kick the can down the road' for a really long time too. I havent appreciated that either. I do now. "There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing." - Ralph Peters/Constant Conflict People need to understand that the troops are never 'coming home'. People can call USA the world police if they want to but the fact is that the world needs policing and if nobody else is willing to do it then USA must. The UN is a failure and it is time to admit it. USA does not need and cannot wait for the permission of the liberal UN to defend itself and other civilized nations from terror or rogue nations. The UN is full of European cowards that will not even help form a strong coalition to defeat ISIS or a strong coalition to punish China for breaking international law and WTO rules. Obama and Clinton are as bad as their liberal European friends that control the UN. Iraq is a failed state without the help of the US Government and the US military. Leaving the Iraqis alone to fend for themselves at this point is certainly not doing them any favours. If Hilary is elected it will not just be Iraq that suffers but the entire middle east, and the chaos that she is willing to create by 'bringing the troops home' will threaten every civilized western nation and each and every citizen. And yeah, they only persist with this 'bring the troops home' stuff for their own selfish liberal agenda - but the time has come to make the liberal base understand the hard truths because they are putting themselves and the rest of us in great danger with their liberal criminal compassion and it needs to end. Like Ralph Peters says - we are going to do a fair amount of killing. Hilary is clearly not up to the task. If the USA is forced to bomb an area that will cause significant collateral damage can she do it? Of course not. Her liberal mentality prevents her from doing what is necessary to defend the nation and the global community. This is a key issue with Clinton and if the moderators to not press her on this in the upcoming debates us conservatives have every right to call foul. It is vitally important that USA has a strong Commander in Chief in these dangerous times and Hilary is clearly not the person for that job. Ben Carson was asked in the GOP debates if he had the strength to order air strikes that would result in the deaths of many thousands of innocent children, and while the crowd did not like it, we do need a leader that has the strength to resist allowing criminal compassion cause situations to become worse than they need to be. The reason Libya is such a living hell right now is not because of England and France - the blame is with Obama and Hilary for deciding to be cowards and have the US military 'lead from behind'. The US military is the most powerful military the world has ever known yet Obama and Hilary wanted it to 'lead from behind'? If the US military was led by a Commander in Chief that allowed them to go in to Libya hard and strong - and allowed the required amount of troops to remain to keep order then there would have been far less suffering. The fact is that collateral damage is unavoidable in war and the only compassionate way to go about it is to go in with full force so that the conflict can be resolved as quickly and cleanly as possible. It is an act of criminal compassion to advocate the 'pin prick' liberal approach to modern war, conflict and terror. It is also unacceptable for liberals to draw red lines and constantly allow them to be crossed without consequence. You pardon one offense you encourage the commission of many. Liberals are just not up to the task of leading the worlds superpower against the threat matrix of Islamic Terror and the increasing threat of rogue nations such as Russia, Iran, China and North Korea.
Interesting point. Regardless of whether or not this latest action which ended up supporting extremists was a mistake or not, it is a demonstrable fact that US citizens are being grossly lied to by Gov't and the Mainstream media.