Secret Service Says No Gun Involved in Trump Rally Commotion

Irregardless of the Trump Campaign's belying last night's commotion at a Trump rally as a brave Donald Trump surviving an assassination attempt, the reality has began to leak out as it is found that the protester was actually a Republican and there was no gun.

Don't expect to hear the truth from either the alt-right nor the ilk that believes everything that it [the alt-right media] tells them to think.

The SS has released further information:

Secret Service Says No Gun Involved in Trump Rally Commotion

Now sit back and watch as right-wingers continue to refer to this as an assassination attempt; that Trump survived an assassination attempt and came back and spoke yet Hillary was afraid of a little misting of rain.

 

There is no such word as 'irregardless'.

 

It was a false assisnation attempt. It's like a false bomb threat, you have to take precautions, and even if isn't real can still be worrying. I'm not claiming he survived being assassinated, it just seems like you are saying because it wasn't real that it doesn't matter.

 

It is pretty surprising that Austyn Crites' name shows up in the wikileaks dumps. I went through the search process at Wikileaks and it's definitely there. All it says is that he received a copy of the TND, which I think is the Traditional Neighborhood Development paper, which kind of squares with what he said about canvasing for HRC. It is plausible that he's a disaffected republican who finds Trump unbearable. Clearly not a frigging assassin though!

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/11/06/donald-trump-nevada-rally/93385996/

 

Actually he's a paid Hillary hack but don't let that get in the way of your spin.

 

You don't know that. You wish it were so. I researched the Wikileaks connection. Did you? If you've got something legit, add a link. Otherwise you're blowing smoke.

 

Yes I did research it myself. At this point, I won't give her campaign the benefit of the doubt the connection is there and this is right out of the Clintoncrat playbook. If they'll pay people to attack Trump supporters under the guise of being Bernie supporters they'll pay a guy to pretend to be republican.

 

Remember this?

[video=youtube;Nn0_w8l7wuQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn0_w8l7wuQ[/video]

Unflappable. It's no wonder that the GOP is scared to death of Hillary "Iron Pants-suit" Clinton.

 

"Assassination attempt"?

Not even close. Trump probably paid the guy.

 

What's your point? They did almost the same thing as Trump, except there is one difference; Hillary's stage was an island, no where to take her that still wasn't exposed. So the secret service formed a wall in front of the assailant to protect her, actually putting their lives at risk. It was an unideal situation since there was not a back stage they could retreat to.

It was nothing worse than that sniper fire she had to endure....

 

So you're just jumping to conclusions and broad-brushing people. What exactly is the definition of a "hack"?

 

Produce evidence to support that made up claim!

 

I thought it might have been a false flag. This election is getting really uncertain in the sense that you can't trust anything. Can't know for sure.

Seems like we should believe him until there's evidence otherwise though. And if either way this changes anyone's mind at this point they probably shouldn't be voting at all.

 

The guy who was paid by Hillary to disrupt a Trump rally is the hack. A hack is a person who will vote for a lady who has never told the truth, even when she's caught lying she holds the lie and the hack loves her for it

 

Well this violent leftist went to college in Chicago. I guess those gun laws work....sometimes.

 

Well I don't see why there needs to be a debate? The SS saw something that made them feel it was necessary to remove Trump. There's tons of security there so whatever that guy did? It had to be enough for them to warrant removing him. That's the last resort. I will trust their judgement.

 

No no. Trust the judgement of the liberals on this board. They know what happened better than the SS did.

 

Put up a link. Otherwise you're twisting in the wind.

 

You and I both know I could provide 100% undeniable evidence and Clintoncrats would still deny it. It's what they do

- - - Updated - - -

And what you fail to understand is I don't care what you think about it. Clintoncrats will never admit the truth so why spend time providing it to them.

 

Of course there was no gun. InfoWars reports a shooting/assassination attempt and righties go crazy.

Go figure

 

Then why don't you do it. I called you out and you didn't even try to back up your claim.

You and I both know that answer to that question. You made it up.

 

It is a word. It's just nonstandard due to the double negative produced by "ir" and "less".

If it bothers you that much to use a word that is used in the common vernacular I can ask a mod to change it to irrespective.

 

Do you really think the RWers are going "up" the conversation at this point.!!

 

But here you are, propagating stuff that isn't true. Hypocrisy.

 

Keep telling yourself that, it makes you a good Clintoncrat