Trump claims he can’t be sued for inciting rally violence

The interesting part of this lawsuit is that it's not dismissed out of hand which implies it has some merit which is being considered by the judge.

Trump was not POTUS at the time of the incident which means that POTUS immunity cannot apply.

Outcome will be watched with interest by many because there may be others waiting in the wings for a slice of the action.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/trump-inciting-violence-protest-rally-lawsuit-237249

 

Not surprised at all: When was the last time a con artist took personal responsibility?

 

This is one more incident that shows how much trump worships authoritarian power, and there are many. The latest is his statement that he "would be honored to meet with (Jung Un)." His affinity for dictators and statements like this reveal his own wish to be "honored" as one of them.

 

Then Obama is responsible for deaths at the hands of BLM, for openly supporting it....if we're picking nits=)

 

"Get them out of here" is not inciting violence

 

Offering to pay the legal fees of anyone who assaults a protestor is.

 

Protestor??? Oh, you mean those losers hired by democrats to disrupt political rallies.....

 

Wow, I guess that suddenly makes assault legal and encouraging it ok.

 

He is mired in lawsuits..and this is just the beginning.

 

Except Trump only offered to pay legal fees for people who defended him or others from being attacked by protestors. Specifically, he referenced those who stopped people getting ready to throw tomatoes.

 

Since when does removing protesters equal beating them?