Terrorist attack in London on Wesminister Bridge

The three suspected terrorists have been shot dead.

They were the men who drove the van into people and then went down to Borough Market and started trying to stab people. They were shot within 8 minutes of the police arriving on the scene and the police have now said there were no explosives.

 

Saddam was ugly and effective. That is why it was okay to

Yes, both Iraq wars were clearly, with hind sight, horrific strategic errors. Western foreign policy since 1945 has been characterized by endless warfare, intervention and failure.

 

You sir, are THAT yellow bellied, muslim apologist that says if we just hug them enough, it will all be ok! Nonsense, this is a scourge of an excuse of a religion of piece i.e. piece of an arm, a leg, and heads.....Some religion!!!! I'll stand by to be called up again, to fight this scourge while they continue to rape european women, throw gays off of buildings, burn people alive in cages, behead infidels, fly planes into buildings, drive vans and buses into crowds, detonate bombs at concerts and soccer games, stab innocent pedestrians, and suicide bomb into crowds...yeah, you keep blaming me and everyone else for these atrocities carried out on a daly basis world wide, while get ready to be called up again to fight against this, to allow you to spew your hate for those who protect your naivety.

It truly amazes me how day in and day out their are real muslim apologists like yourself, all the while some suicide bomber just pressed his little red button, yet again!!! FANTASTIC!!!

 

Exactly, we are raising a generation being told that this crapola is the norm, cost of doing business.

 

Most UK Muslims and American Muslims would vivisect the fanatics if it was an option. Most Muslims hate their guts. But ugly is illegal in the West - not an option.

 

They may get a belly full of this nonsense, but I would not count on that in the UK.

 

Holly Muhammad...!!!
How many hairy freaken virgin Muslims are there ????

 

No you are way off. First I am a woman. Second I said nothing about hugging them. I said that the police had shot them dead.

Do you have any idea what you are saying nonsense to because I do not. What I said was true. The US started a 'war on terror' because of 9/11. 9/11 was apparently because of your encouragement to Israel not to go by the Oslo agreement. You then embarked on first of all an attack on Afghanistan and then the destruction of the Middle East. Prior to the US war on Iraq which was given on the lies that Iraq had WMD'S and Al Qaeda types in it, our intelligence said no WMD's and no al Qaeda types - if fact they absolutely hated Saddham but the one thing which would put them in Iraq would be an invasion of it. In addition this would almost certain result in Islamist terrorism coming to our streets.

With full knowledge that this was what the situation was, the US and UK attacked Iraq. Clearly they knew they would be bringing terrorists to our streets. I wonder why they wanted that,

 

There always is plenty of attacks on Muslims after any Muslim terrorist attack in any place in Europe. Don't worry, innocent Muslims will suffer.

 

I'm English and have always supported and voted for the great Patriotic Parties that are pledged to keep immigrants out, so my conscience is quite clear..

 

Good to know the concern is focused on a nonsensical innocent muslims will suffer instead of the innocents slaughtered in London. Takes a certain kind of head in the sand to come up with that.


Another terror attack. Thoughts and prayers to the victims and their loved ones.

 

Is there any such thing as an "innocent muslim"?
They're ALL Jesus-rejecters and Christian/Jew-haters and they ALL sing from this same song book-

[Quran 9.123]- "O you who believe! fight those of the infidels who are near to you and let them find in you hardness"
[Quran 5.51]- "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends.."

 

Oh, I am about the only person on this thread who has been interested in the attack. Most other people's prime interest has been harming Muslims. I simply responded to someone who was responding to someone worried that Muslims would not suffer that innocent Muslims most certainly would - they always do. I will say again I am the main, possibly the only person who has actually given information on the attack while the rest of you have been involved in a sickening Muslim hate fest with no regard or respect for the people killed injured and traumatised.

 

Not to Nazis. The only difference between yourself and the terrorist is you have not yet as far as I know started killing. The hate, the same. The collective blame, the same.

 

Yes. There are innocent muslims. Asad Shah in Scotland. But he was part of a minority sect within Islam that believed in tolerance and inclusion. He paid dearly for that minority viewpoint, with his life, as he was stabbed to death 31 times by a pos Muslim.

 

An English Muslim. However you also are no better than the terrorists blaming all Muslims, apart from one - just like the Nazis always had the one Jew they liked. Collective blame allowing you collective punishment when you start acting what is in your mind.

 

You seem confused. The attacks in Manchester were committed by Islamic jihadis.

Facts do not equal "hate fest".

You have not posted one single thought or concern for the innocent people killed tonight.

 

Clearly you believe you are being clever but this has no relationship to what I was talking about. I appreciate that to you it only matters to hate Muslims but this thread is on an attack tonight.

You have shown no knowledge of 'facts'. You chose to say one Muslim was innocent. One who was well known for how they lived and died. The fact that you said there was one innocent Muslim was you also saying all the others are not. Like other people in this thread, it is just to you for hating Muslims. You are boring.

 

He was from Scotland actually. You cannot wrap your brain around that murder, can you? Shah was a muslim, he was part of a minority sect that believed in inclusion and tolerance.
And he was slaughtered by another muslim.

You may want to get some sleep as the Nazi references and emotional claims are making you look very foolish and naive.

 

Asad Shah was mudered in Scotland. Feel free to find facts to refute that.

 

Pointless.

 

Of course he was. I am from Scotland. I know all about what happened. What is your mind up to now.

 

I don't hate muslims, I simply avoid them, they're not my kind of people..

 

This is what we are told, and yet ex muslims, a rare bird, like Ali Rizvi, would say people who believe this don't really understand islam or muslims. I have posted an interview with him, 3 hours long, a few times in the past to inform people of the reality, so no need to do it again. But basically what a non radical muslim says in front of westerners and what they say behind close doors to one another is 180 degrees apart. He was referring to the sunni sect of islam. Given Ali is now an atheist, walked away from islam, and does not support it nor believe in it, he is one of a few who will give you the inside scoop on the subject. And he totally contradicts what you and others say. So, who are we to believe? I think Ali is telling the truth, whereas what you and others say are just misinformed, perhaps having bought into what muslims say to westerners, which of course are lies. There is no religion as serious as islam. Christians by comparison are hypocrites, being able to separate their brain into sections, and compared to muslims are not religious, by the book at all. This is because of the difference in western culture when compared to the Islamic tribal cultures of the middle east and north Africa. Muslims take their religion much more seriously than any other religion on earth, which make them the most dangerous religion on earth, given the militant, death worshiping jihad belief system.

Truth is, according to Ali, is that a muslim will side with even a radical, over a non muslim. They may not personally do terror attacks, but in some perverse way are fine with the radicals striking out against the infidels and non muslims, and the nations which are killing muslims in the middle east. So you are wrong, and the few muslims who actually would not back the radicals over westerners are a scant few serious reformers in the UK and America. But these reformers are despised by so called moderate muslims for they are perceived to be heretics.

That multicultural faux liberals are being duped is nothing new, for they are such easy marks in their disconnected from reality idealism.

 

They are indeed. There was something like 280 attacks on Muslims and Muslim property in the UK in the two weeks after 9/11 including at least one murder of a Muslim.