There is nothing worse then a mentally unstable person at the head of a country.

Meaning, it's better to hide and be safe than it is to stand up and be counted, because you and your apparently count for nothing.
Seems the people of North Korea agree; most of them live in destitute poverty and fear of their lives in return for not resisting threats.
Perhaps you live in the wrong country, as most of us are willing to stand up when conditions call for it.

 

How was Clinton unstable?

 

Anyone else see something odd about this text? I've seen this effect used in a chat before, but never a forum post.

 

Lol... Oh you guys... pathetic really.

 

. You have to laugh at these scum bag supporters and their charge of Hillary lied being a problem, when scum bag is by far the biggest liar most people in this country has ever seen. Their is a twisted logic that voting for Hillary makes people guilty of electing scum bag, can everyone see the goofiness in this.

 

The fact that he sentenced his uncle and aunt to death doesn't give you a clue?

 

We laugh at the squirming left who won't have a chance until 2024

 

Idiotic, these poor people in NK , how they suffer, so to support these poor people we should nuke them. You want the definition of stupidity, you will join that group, when in a debate, you tell someone that they should move to another country. Like their values belongs here but yours doesn't. Stand up and be counted, is that the same as resolving the NK problem with stupidity instead of reason.

 

Is he the first dictator to consolidate power?

 

What kind of question is that? You asked how Un is a "madman". Are you saying that killing his family is part of the job description, or something like that?

I have trouble remembering any dictator in the last couple of centuries who is not a "madman". But definitely no sane ones who "consolidate power" by murdering their own family.

Please enlighten us by naming one...

 

He's no different than any other dictator and those "madmen" have a long and established history of responding to deterrence.

 

So what? Speak clearly. Has it been shown to you how he is a madman or not? That was your question, right? And why are you changing the subject?

 

Almost always when people call him a madman it's in the context of "he's a madman! He's use nuclear weapons at the drop of a hat and we can't deter him with retaliation!"

That position is absurd. Un is hardly the first dictator "madman" to have control of nuclear weapons and he's already been shown to respond to deterrence. If he was so mindlessly obsessed with mass murder and didn't care about retaliation, then he'd have already launched attacks with chemical and biological weapons on South Korean and Japanese cities.

 

WE have supported many countries that where led by military dictatorship and didn't much care who they killed to stay in power. Not only didn't we act on it like the killers in the hate party want , hell we supported them.

 

what planet do you live on,oh i know planet obama where the truth is a lie and a lie is the truth,you need meds,or a dose of reality.

 

So he's a cowardly madman. Problem is the combination of madman and absolute dictator. I mean, we have a guy whose sanity is yet to be determined in charge of ours. But at least he's not a dictator. That's why congress is placing restrictions on his power to use nukes.

 

Pathetic we might be. Sweating we're not.

 

Sorry your reality is nonsense, it doesn't even exist in anyplace other then inside the monomind of your hate party. How does this have anything to do with Obama , that is by far the weakest answer that you can put here., It says nothing about the issue. How stupid do you have to be to support your pig by what anyone else does or did. That is simply blind ignorance.

 

By the way , you above anyone else here should know the folly of wars that are total lies. I assume you were in Vietnam the biggest peace of nonsense and lie in the last 100 years. So why would you want our young going to war with NK, It comes out of the mouths of two insane leaders and a lie from both sides ,We would be nuts and brainless to start something with them. I bet your one of those nuke em guys like the rest of the hate party.

 

this has everything to do with obama,just like the middle east ,russia and china,obama left this president a mess.
It was clear what Obama officials were doing in 2013. The DIA report represented inconvenient facts that threatened President Obama’s North Korea “strategic patience” policy -- a policy to do nothing about North Korea and kick this problem down the road to the next president. Obama officials tried to downplay the DIA assessment to prevent it from being used to force the president to employ a more assertive North Korea policy.
just like everything obama touched he screw the pooch,what a guy.
you can still see his lines in the sand in syria from outer space.
obama did nothing but run his head.

 

yes i was there and i do not want anyone's son or daughter to have to go to any stinking war.
The Policy of Appeasement eventually became recognised as short term fix when it was made clear that the Policy would not stop Hitler and war was inevitable. However Britain and France failed to intervene when Hitler's grievances stretched much further than the original legitimate plans.

Appeasement never works,and i will say bush kicked the can too,but we can not take a chance on this wingnut.
i do not want to wake up to a nuke in LA or NY .

 

Well you just won a contest for the most stupid comment of the month, Obama left Scum bag with a mess , that's the line that wins the contest but you could have won the contest with the rest of your lies also. Tell the truth about the DIA. Your comment is word for word from a rag paper Called the Western free press. A source that is total bullshit. By the way where are those quotation marks on your liars comment and why didn't you source it considering it wasn't any of your own words. So you find a rag source read it, turn it into gospel and come here and pollute the forum with your lies. Your pitiful.

 

yes i was there and i do not want anyone's son or daughter to have to go to any stinking war.
The Policy of Appeasement eventually became recognised as short term fix when it was made clear that the Policy would not stop Hitler and war was inevitable. However Britain and France failed to intervene when Hitler's grievances stretched much further than the original legitimate plans.

Appeasement never works,and i will say bush kicked the can too,but we can not take a chance on this wingnut.
i do not want to wake up to a nuke in LA or NY .

man you need help.

 

As the Obama administration was leaving, and the Trump administration was moving in, President Obama told President Trump that North Korea was the #1 foreign policy problem he would face. Not Russia, not ISIS, not Syria, not Iraq, not Afghanistan, not Al Qaeda.

North Korea.

Obama knew this!

Perhaps you can explain why Obama knew this and did nothing.

And what would Hillary Clinton have done about it?

 

Yup that is exactly what the right wing has said about Chamberlain and his appeasing Hitler. Lets try some fact then, the Munich Agreement was in 38 . What would have happened at that time if they declared war on Germany. They declared war on Germany a year later after a massive buildup of weapons over the years time. and they admitted, without reserve, that if Hitler would have attacked when Britain declared war on Germany, they would have been beaten quite easily and when Chamberlain signed the Munich agreement, Hitler would have gone through Britain in the same manner as The German blitzkrieg on the continent. Now that's what happened but it turned into a gun Bubba rant for going to war if someone looks at us wrong. It's total complete bullshit.