Clean up in aisle 9

The message the democrats keep missing is that Mueller investigated for two years and found no evidence of collusion. But the democrats refuse to let it go.

Was that you that posted the thread? "Will the republicans accept the Mueller Report" It appears that the question should have been whether the democrats would accept the Mueller report.

 

The alleged russian interference is just a liberal false flag to cover up their shock that trump won and hillsry lost

 

How would you like that tattoo on your forehead to read? Shame? Slow-learner?

Barr will get to the bottom of the obstruction. 30,000 subpoenaed emails vanished overnight.

 

Really? I want facts on that or you're just making stuff up.

 

Have patience grasshopper. You will hear from Barr, Horowitz, and Huber soon.

 

The only point made here that is correct is point 3....

If you were working at a grocery store, you'd be fired for actually making more of a mess in aisle 9.

 

The more I think about it, pretty much all progressives on this board endeavor to bring Trumpists closer to factual reality while they kick and scream the whole way.

 

Maybe you just didn't hear. The Democrats fully accept the Report. They embrace it, they make love to it, they long to show it off to everybody on live TV. The Trump Party hates it. It's like a stake through their hearts, it is poison in their stew, the desperately want it to go away. They never want it to see the light of day and will go to great lengths to stop that. They pray their "no collusion" whine will protect them from that damn Part Two. Other than that your post is right on.

 

It appears the only kicking and screaming is from the same suspects since that fateful night in Nov 2016.

 

The democrats are still looking for collusion. They love the obstruction part because it is something they can hand their hats on, but Mueller recommended convictions for everyone else, but not Trump.

 

We have not given the Russians nearly enough credit for what they pulled off. They very likely did support Trump over Hilary because they understood our minds better than we thought. If Trump won, they knew the US would head into this level of discontent over the election. They understood Trump and they understood what the democrat reaction would be.

I hate to give them credit. But it was brilliant.

 

As I said to someone yesterday.........you folks really need to stop kidding yourselves.

 

Another anonymous person?. No one cares what you said yesterday.

 

Thanks for the update Lee. See ya in 2024 as Trump leaves office.

 

The more I think about it, pretty much all progressives on this board endeavor to bring Trumpists closer to factual reality while they kick and scream the whole way. Even those who didn't vote for the Orange Nightmare (wink).

 

You ok with making bogus charges up like Russian collusion?

 

You never did admit to voting for the felon. I didn't vote for either. There were fifteen other republicans on those debate stages, but none of them won. Now we we are stuck with what we got. I would still like to make the best of it. That is opposed to you who wants to make the worse of it no matter how it hurts the US. The Russians won this one hands down.
And I am out of here for a few hours on the road, maybe all day.

 

Please cite the portion of the Mueller Report that so states. I can find no such reference in my copy of the report in either of the Executive Summaries or the table of contents. Perhaps you can find it in your copy of the Report and forward the page references to me. Thanks.

 

On the contrary. Making the worst of it means acquiescing to the incompetent criminal in the Oval Office...........or perhaps I should say on the golf course.

 

One more thing, the FBI didn't spy on Crooked Donald.

Wray: I Don’t ‘Personally’ Have Evidence Of Illegal Spying On Trump Camp In 2016

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/wray-no-evidence-of-illegal-spying-trump-campaign

FBI Director Chris Wray said Tuesday he had no evidence “personally” that the FBI illegally spied on the Trump campaign in 2016, undercutting a favorite but unfounded claim made by the President and his allies.

Wray, in testimony to a Senate appropriations subcommittee, also distanced himself from use of the word “spying” — a term Attorney General Bill Barr invoked — to describe the surveillance actions taken by the bureau in the lead-up to the election.

“That’s not the term I would use,” Wray said, while adding “different people use different colloquial phrases.”

The comment came during questioning from Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), who also asked Wray if he had evidence of illegal surveillance.

“I don’t think I personally have any evidence of that sort,” Wray said.

 

Here's another one to add to the list.

The grand jury materials can absolutely be released to Congress by the presiding judge if the appropriate authorities seek their release.

Also, members of the Intel Committees are authorized to see redacted material that falls under the category of being withheld for national security reasons.

 

Trrrrrruuuuummmmp!!!!!!!

 

What a powerful argument you make (wink).

 

How can you push back against collusion delusion syndrome?

 

To put it in a way you can appreciate........Mueller!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!