Community is up in arms after neighbor installs giant swastika in front yard

Said no one ever.... but thanks for the pure stupidity.

 

We already have it in the hood, its an old germanic symbol on germanic tomb stones

 

Really? Do you have pics?
I thought Germans tried to destroy everything Nazi back in the day.

 

Well, the guy has a Hindu symbol in his yard and you made the assumption he was an ******* for having it. Pretty straightforward.

 

That has nothing to do with Nazi. Its an old germanic rune depicting the sun.

And we even have church bells praising Hitler xD

 

The hexagram is used in witchcraft events. It is devil worship. The hexagram on the Israeli flag represents the Rothschilds because they were the ones who made it happen.

 

Most of what you think you know is wrong =

Americans Are Surprised Domestic Terrorism Isn’t A Federal Crime. Most Think It Should Be.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/dome...l-law-poll-doj-fbi_n_5acd1c78e4b09212968c8907

 

Were we talking about Muslim terrorists? Could have fooled me. Try not to deflect next time.

 

I've bought the house across the street and have planning permission to erect an artwork of Donald and Adolf tonguing on the back of a pink Harley with a painting of Harvey Milk on the tank. They're surrounded by pedo priests. It's a kind of nativity scene.

It's for freedom. Support it. Talk about it. Post memes about it. Make it known. Embed it into the culture. Make it okay. Make it normal. If anyone's offended just smirk at them.

 

Did johnson graduate from the lib public schools?

If so he may be an expert at putting condoms on cucumbers

But genuinely know nothing about history

 

hahaha I don't care about an op-ed on the HUFFINGTON POST....I showed you the Federal Code that highlights that it is fact a crime. I literally showed you the a link to the Federal Code and you throw up some op-ed...wow.

 

NO! FDR, operated as a dictator to those he ordered to die, 2, World War II, 1941–45, 405,399, 297 ... "Deaths per day" is the total number of ...

You appear to approve the Jews dying.

The liberty movement believes rather ill people enjoy losing their freedom.



I have no dog in the hunt for what homosexuals put into their mouths.

While I do not qualify as the complete scholar for all parts of global history since records have been kept, I see how you offer only wise cracks when

I try to inform the forum about history. Those talking as you talk deserve no lessons.

Bush never had to wait for Saddam to attack us the way FDR Screwed off waiting for Japan to bomb us first. FDR deliberately caused the attack on the captured Hawaiian Islands.

 

So Judiaism is associated with witchcraft, got it

 

Saying Sadam was going to or could attack us is uninformed as one can get.

 

I see you saying that, but not President Bush. President Bush's exact claim is Saddam is a grave gathering danger.

President Clinton signed the law to get Saddam out of Iraq and said law was operational prior to Bush being sworn as president.

CIA head claimed to Bush that Saddam has WMD. General Sada said George Tenet was correct.

 

Good grief, what law was that and what Sadam have to strike the USA.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Liberation_Act

Strike us? Bush said Saddam was a grave gathering danger. Clinton believed it so he signed the above law.

 

The House of Representatives passed the bill 360 - 38 on October 5, and the Senate passed it with unanimous consent two days later. President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act into law on October 31, 1998.

Looks like there was broad, bipartisan support for it, too.
In fact, the Democrats were all for getting rid of Saddam, until it became clear Bush would actually do it.

 

President Clinton believed that. Another secret; Democrats believed it too.

 

Good god, how you people misread things...

The law's stated purpose was: "to establish a program to support a transition to democracy in Iraq."

Meaning if the IRAQI people wanted to attempt to ditch Saddam, we'd support any effort along those lines... show me where in that law it states the US would remove Saddam??

Anybody with those reading comprehension skills can make anything say anything...

 

Well, using an alternative comparative to demonstrate the invalidity of your comparative argument on "statistical threats" has obviously fooled you.

Next time perhaps try to think about what is being said before kneejerking a dismissal.

 

What if he put this in his yard instead? Would there have been a fuss?

 

SEC. 3. <<NOTE: Saddam Hussein.>> SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING UNITED
STATES POLICY TOWARD IRAQ.
It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to
remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to
promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-105publ338/html/PLAW-105publ338.htm

 

Then we'd have a dyslexic Nazi.... Go Hilter!!!!

 

Exactly... thanks for chiming in supporting me... I knew we could work together if needed...