Exactly. There's so much crap coming out of that corner it's hard to tell what's fake and what isn't. It all fits into the narrative, fake or not.
The terrorists are victims of "the media". Precious. Or, maybe, that group gets the coverage because they are the largest group that has sworn to murder us all. Just a thought. Maybe there are fewer success stories because all of our efforts are focused on disrupting those credible threats.
Oh gosh. You are a gem. Hi. I'm Ctrl. I'm gonna thread hump you a little. Define fascism please. We will deal with that whole terrorism thing in a minute. What a doll... lol.
Pssst... they aren't. That's why every agency is focused on and kicking ass at disrupting the main terrorist threat in the US. You only hear about a few cause... reasons... but they are working around the clock ****ing up terrorists sworn to destroy the US... despite your apologies.
The only folk that are ignoring trends in terrorism in this thread are right wingers. The only question is then why? Are they tacitly supporting these acts? Are they victims of media bias? Are they suffering dissonance? The problem is that, give the various explanations, they wont be able to answer honestly. A dilemma...
Nobody is ignoring trends. There are more domestic right wing terror attacks than Islamic terror attacks. That is because our law enforcement is focused on the actual threats of terrorism, and why there so many more arrests of islamic terrorists than domestic RW terrorists. That is law enforcement doing its job. Lone nutjobs are hard to account for. Also, antifa attacks are spiking while we are not ignoring trends.
No, actually there aren't. You're being lied to. Included in their "right wing" list of attacks, in order to base their claims, they included attacks that were non-ideological. For example, they count the yoga center shooting (done by an incel), as right wing. Why are they able to make the claim that it increased? One event: the Las Vegas shooting. Yes, they are trying to claim the Las Vegas shooting was "right wing terrorism". They lie. It's what they do. Just like when they include suicides in "gun violence", they have to fluff their nonsense with bull****. Take an actual look at the data they use to come to a conclusion, and it collapses every time. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/searc...e&ob=GTDID&od=desc&expanded=yes#results-table
You continue to misrepresent. You cannot critique any of the research presented, instead preferring to fib over what the START data says. However, thanks for proving my point to Ctrl. God bless
I love when propagandists double down, as you have done so thoroughly and so often, in this thread. Anyone with eyeballs can see what you're doing. Who knows, maybe some low IQ person will actually believe what you're saying. The reality is, I'm flogging you with your own source. Please continue partially quoting me and editing out the truth. I love when people do that.
Why do you keep hiding? You've been given three quotes from three research articles, all of which show you are wrong. Why can't you critique them? Why do you have to go into childish dodge routines?
This antifa terrorist violence has got to stop. Looks like congress is taking steps to designate them as a terrorist group.