Rittenhouse trial goes to opening statements after jury set

I love the seething hate we see from the woke side of the aisle, for this kid. he did us a favor by removing from society two scum bags-both with records and one a chester.

 

No sir, it is my opinion that Rosenbaum's life was forfeit when he threatened Kyle's. Kyle did what he had to do. To be honest I would hope that if I were in a similar situation that I would have the fortitude to actually pull the trigger, and if I am pulling the trigger I am going to make sure the threat is neutralized.

 

yeah Darwin is a bitch.

 

being a criminal. he already had a weapons conviction

 

No, Darwin does a great job with the unvaccinated.

 

your anti Trump rants have no place here. I do note that the people most likely to hate Rittenhouse are the most likely to be members of the Talibiden fan club

 

He wasn't there with Rosenbaum, hence he ran alongside with Rittenhouse and asked him what was going on.

And I really could care less Grosskreutz broke a law for having a weapon.... since Rittenhouse is not allowed to be policing against it. Hence it remains so that Rittenhouse pointed his weapon at Grosskreutz who had his hands up... this means Rittenhouse forfeited his right of self defense by default and giving it to Grosskreutz who then has the right to protect himself... with a gun.

And the licensed of Grosskreutz only expired. It wasn't revoked for breaking the law. You're being dishonest on purpose in an attempt to portrait Grosskreutz as a criminal / shooting a criminal isn't bad.

 

GrossKreutz permit expired, that's all. The goal of GrossKreutz remains to be that he was there as a trained paramedic helping out the injured. You're leaving it out that it is wise for GrossKreutz to do that with a gun. You're just flat out dishonest to claim he was there to riot. There isn't even a charge against him about it. Hence it is so, that you're flat out dishonest. While the goal of Rittenhouse was to scare people with his loaded rifle during a riot.

 

You mean the one that you can’t tell what’s going on? LOL

 

AHAHHAHAA that explains the constant lying and making excuse after excuse for the criminals. It's the same crowd.

 

Uhh... Rittenhouse main goal was to scare people by bringing his loaded rifle to a riot. And giving a threat with words while unarmed, is by no means a reason to execute anybody. That's just utterly nuts. And to scare people with a loaded rifle,... how on earth is such a thing to be considered self defense?

 

More made up garbage. You are projecting what you would do.

 

You should watch the video where he's not just rioting, but attempted to shoot Kyle. But you're not going to watch the video, as you'd have to edit every one of your posts.

 

So Grosskreutz was carrying illegally. Thanks for verifying that.

 

Do these things really have to be spelled out on a middle school scenario? Or are you just going be bias no matter what?

Rittenhouse was RETREATING. Running away. He didn't engage GG, GG engaged Rittenhouse.
GG was chasing him with a Glock, making him the aggressor. He was attacking Rittenhouse.
You don't have a right to self defense when you are attacking someone.
Coupled with the fact that GG was committing a felony having the gun in the first place because he is a convicted felon.
Any felon brandishing a Glock 40, chasing people down has not self defense claim.

GG testified he wasn't shot until he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse has every right to defend himself from an attacker meaning he has a right to hold GG at gun point.

When you are being chased by a convicted felon with a Glock 40, you don't lose your self defense rights for pointing your gun at a convicted felon chasing you with a Glock 40

 

It's not crystal clear, but clear enough for sure to be able to understand that Rosenbaum never lunged at Rittenhouse. Hence the conclusion becomes that Rittenhouse is a liar about what went on and made it up. He simply swung around and shot Rosenbaum in a spit second after he heard gunshots from somewhere else. And he kept on shooting, totally needlessly when Rosenbaum was falling down. His 2 deadly shots were definitely made when there wasn't any threat at all. Hence it's murder.

 

Well except for the eye witness, a prosecution witness at that, and the forensic evidence you might have something.

You watch too much TV and have little understanding of gun use or self defense.

 

You know, watching the video would cure all of these hilarious and unsupportable mistakes.

 

GrossKreutz ran along side Rittenhouse, and asked him questions to witch Rittenhouse replied. That debunks your entire claim that there was a chase between the 2 of them. And you to are making up that GrossKreutz is a convicted felon. His license expired. That's it. And you're utterly dishonest by leaving out that Rittenhouse FIRST pointed his rifle at Grosskruetz who had his hands up. That's why GrossKreutz got the right to defend himself.

 

GK chased him 2 blocks.

 

2 witnesses testified that Rosenbaum lunged. The medical examiner determined that Rosenbaum's hand was on the gun, and testified to that (I didn't watch that part, but many are reporting it). NO ONE testified to Rosenbaum not lunging.

Multiple witnesses testified to Rosenbaum's belligerence. NO ONE testified that Kyle was belligerent, and one testified that he witnessed Kyle deescalate a situation.

It's clear who was there to intimidate. People like Rosenbaum and gang, who were trying to burn the city down, and who were willing to assault/kill anyone trying to prevent damage.

 

The authorities had full access to Kyle's phone, and found absolutely nothing incriminating, or they would have used it in the trial I just watched.

 

Huh?
Please...Get your FACTS Straight...

As has been posted (at least) 100 Times at this Forum...

GG IS NOT A CONVICTED FELON...

It was widely, and falsely, reported on social media that Gaige Grosskreutz is a felon. This is false. He is not a felon.
He does, however, have a prior misdemeanor conviction for intoxicated use of a firearm in Wisconsin, online records show. He received probation in that 2015 case, records reveal.

Have you even been paying attention to the case?

If is rather difficuly to give credence to the "input" of someone who (apparently) hasn't even been following the case.

GG is NOT a Convicted Felon...

Your "Input" would be given much more credence IF you weren't (at this late date) still repeating BS.

PS--Just a General Observation:
Any thoughts on why is this thread riddled with people discrediting their input by posting the Same MISINFORMATION (over and over)?

 

He was still carrying illegally.

 

So you're saying the first 2 shots were justified, but .38 seconds later, those 2 shots were not justified, and thus he is guilty?