'Pfizer and Moderna better get this clarified': Study finds worse antibodies after mRNA boosters

What does a N = 29 subjects really mean? More research with a larger cohort is needed to make any definite correlations or causative statements.

 

That isn’t what I said and you knew it when you wrote what you did. Shame on you!

 

Think for yourself after reading the op.
It's a peer-reviewed study I thought you guys were all about that peer review.

 

As a pureblood myself, I find this hilarious.

 

You and I both, my unwashed and unclean brethren!

 

That is not what the link to CVS says, The list that you attached is a list of risks that increase the chances of developing severe covid, it’s not a list of things that would prevent you being prescribed the medication. Not being vaccinated puts you at risk for severe covid as do all the other items on the list.

What the government actually says:

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-updates-paxlovid-health-care-providers

If a person is fully vaccinated and has no other risk factors, why would a doctor prescribe them a medication specifically meant for patients who have risk factors for developing severe covid? If a person is fully vaccinated and has other risk factors, they would be prescribed the medication. Therefore, your post is false and misleading.

 

And what does this peer reviewed study tell you?

 

Seems exactly what you said.

 

Among those who follow it closely, the facts seem to show that the US and at least 1 'ally' were more likely responsible for spreading the stuff. Even 18 months ago they found evidence in Washington State and in Italy that the virus existed in sewage BEFORE the crisis was announced by the politicians. Early on Veterans Today showed evidence that the virus was spread in Wuhan when a world wide Military Olympic Games was held there and the US participated.

Who knows?

 

You should read it…

 

Clearly and obviously to any rational, fair
minded, objective observer it is not. Of course, I’d never accuse you of being any of the above…

 

We had data a year ago showing that the vaccinated were MORE likely to catch Omnicon than the unvaccinated.

 

It tells me that you did not read the op and that you simply have a knee-jerk reaction when anything challenges your faith in the dogmas of your religious science.

 

I do not know what religious science is, but it sounds oxymoronic.

 

Oh.

 

I'm not surprised. Was dx'd with covid last Monday. I've never been so sick in my life. I was dx'd with covid bronchitis. If my husband, who has a slight case, wasn't able to care for me, I'd be in the hospital. I've had the two vaccinations and one booster.

 

It's your devotion to having a knee jerk denial of anything that goes remotely against the official dogma that you take on faith from the propaganda government scientist.

 

Or, and this is just a theory, I abhor anti science nonsense.

 

Do you have documented proof on the number of actual lives saved or just assuming that everyone who got Vaxxed and didn't die were saved by the Vax?

Lastly, the Covid Vax is an experimental genetically engineered drug that has not completed any 5 to 10 year trials conducted on all other vaccines throughout history. Besides the fact this is the FIRST genetically engineered drug mass tested on the public. Thus, we are still in the lab rat phase for those who took it. To make wild assumptions on both sides is very premature.

 

Your username is incredibly ironic seeing as how you buy into the official "science" lock stock and barrel.

Good luck with the long-term effects of your vaccine and your multiple boosters and whatever the next one they want you to get is.

 

Thank you. I look forward to the finished possibility of serious illness or death through science.

 

Don't worry.... None of that ever happened.