While we are being distracted by the effort, in multiple venues, to hold Don....

........accountable for the acts he has committed it behooves us to remember something. There is another legal proceeding in progress that has some degree of import to the country, Dominion v. Faux.

News Corp may eventually end up taking an enormous financial hit for reinforcing the lies about voter fraud (it has told hundreds of others). But as of today there has yet to be any internal accountability for what is the most disgraceful, dangerous deceit ever carried out by a major media outlet in the country's history.

Whether Faux is ultimately found guilty of defamation or not, let history record that no one at the network has faced any consequences for the heinous act of knowingly lying to its audience on a matter of great national significance. There is no precedent for it, no parallel to it. And I can say with confidence something like this will never happen again.........unless Faux does it.

 

I think what you mean is, while the left focuses on Trans day and Dlvegence against Trump, many countries are dropping or threatening to drop the use dollar as international currency...

Your media is clearly doing a good job distracting you.

 

Do you have an opinion as to why Faux has chosen not to hold anyone at the network accountable for the monumental fraud it perpetrated?

 

Hey Now, many can chew gum and walk at the same time...

 

They actually did hold some people accountable. Lou Dobbs was one of the the most vocal conspiracy theorist, and they canceled his show. He was neck deep in promoting the Dominion conspiracies. They also canceled Glenn Beck.

 

Democrat leaders are masters at controlling their base.
They decide which squirrel their followers chase.

Their hatred for the number 1-2-3-4- and 5th largest viewed news network is only over exposure of the lefts continuing anti American and anti constitutional values.

Its easy to figure out when their beloved CNN has tanked to ratings below the Cartoon channel and Nickelodeon for the exposure of fake news that can't muster 400K viewers even in prime time but you won't hear any accusations coming from the left on CNNs actual failures.

 

I mean, four states Supreme Courts issued rulings that Democrats violated election laws in their states, by illegitimately changing the rules without the consent of their legislature... things like:

- Mass mail-in voting... in some cases, just sending out a ballot to literally everyone who was registered to vote.
- Ballot harvesting, as in... allowing people to go door to door and collect ballots on behalf of the political party.
- Ballot drop-boxes... allowing people from anywhere to be able to deliver ballots, without any verification.
- Waiving registration deadlines
- Waiving signature verification
- Waiving proof of identity verification

Here are the four states... all of which led to Democrat wins in tight races (except where the candidate was just really, really bad):

Michigan:
- https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/judge-rules-michigan-sec-state-broke-law-absentee-ballot
- https://www.detroitnews.com/story/n...ure-verification-guidance-invalid/4699927001/
- https://trendingpolitics.com/michig...election-law-with-absentee-ballot-order-knab/
Pennsylvania:
- https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/...ses-pennsylvania-mail-in-voting-law-decision/
- https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/1...-admitting-election-laws-were-broken-in-2020/
Wisconsin:
- https://www.reuters.com/world/us/wi...tlaws-ballot-drop-boxes-elections-2022-07-08/
- https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...me-court-ballot-drop-boxes-violate-state-law/
Georgia:
- https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/10/09...-constitution-athens-clarke-da-race-will-move
- https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/1...didnt-follow-their-own-election-laws-in-2020/


So, I'm not sure what you're talking about... whatever, or wherever you're getting your information, it's really skewed.

 

Oh because it didn't perpetrate one it simply interviewed people and let them speak their mind and present their evidence.

 

This is small potatoes compared to the Russian collusion hoax.

 

Did Fox News detail how Democrats canvas the nation to ballot harvest out of nursing homes?

 

I stand corrected, though Dobbs was not on the "news" side.

But sources at Fox indicated that the Smartmatic lawsuit was just one factor in the decision to cancel Dobbs’ show. His weak performance with advertisers was also a significant factor, one source said.

Dobbs was one of Trump’s most vocal on-air supporters, which kept his show’s ratings high.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/07/medi...at Fox indicated,kept his show's ratings high.

 

What hoax? https://www.usmessageboard.com/thre...-ubiquitous-meme-from-trump-loyalists.977322/

 

I guess you didn't take the time to find out these fake claims were debunked by the FBI and the CIA.
Maybe try looking a bit further than just the claim.

 

Did Trump Himself Rifle Through MAL Docs After Grand Jury Subpoena?


Jack Smith Zeroes In On Obstruction In MAL Case
While we wait to see what’s actually in the Trump indictment in New York state, some potential bombshell news in the Mar-a-Lago documents probe.

The Washington Post story published Sunday seems to rely on the accounts of witnesses who have been questioned by Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team. What they recount suggests an increasing focus on the obstruction of justice aspect of the probe.

To be clear, obstruction has been a key element of this probe for a while now. It was cited in the search warrant for MAL. But as WaPo puts it:

The new details highlight the degree to which special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the potential mishandling of hundreds of classified national security papers at Trump’s Florida home and private club has come to focus on the obstruction elements of the case —whether the former president took or directed actions to impede government efforts to collect all the sensitive records.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/morni...o-documents-obstruction-of-justice-jack-smith

Looking forward to tomorrow's reveal.

 

The judge has adjudicated that everything Fox said about Dominion is false. Now the case goes to the part where we need to find out if they did this on purpose.

In any case, it has already been proven YET AGAIN, that the likelihood that what you see on Fox is a lie is enormously higher than that it's a fact.

And yet, people keep watching it. Why? Because it tells them what they WANT to hear. They don't care if it's true or not. They just want to hear it.

 

You must be mad as hell at MSNBC and CNN for lying to you for all these years.

 

To borrow a phrase, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." Substitute false equivalence for foolish consistency.