An interesting poll of CNN, MSNBC, Fox and Newsmax viewers

My view, is based on facts.
I'd offered you real evidence, that the "proof and evidence," you had cited was, as I'd said, "manufactured B.S." I hold that view, because time and again, that has proven to be the case, and it is clear to any right-minded person (so to speak), that the Republican smear-machine is, and has been, just throwing any baseless attack on Biden at the wall, to see what sticks.

Do you want more examples of bogus, R.W. "proof & evidence?" How about the Dominion voting machine hoax? The millions of dead people and/or illegal aliens voting for Dems, or the "truck loads of fake ballots (think: bamboo fibers)?" The Hugo Chavez connection? The stolen election? The space lasers?

It would appear that your reply to me, above, is better suited to describe your own sensibilities:

If that is your view, then it is not likely to be changed by whatever you hear.

 

Title of Article:
MRC Poll Finds Most CNN & MSNBC Viewers Don’t Know About Biden Scandals and Bad News
What The Title SHOULD Be:
MRC Poll Finds Most CNN & MSNBC Viewers Don’t CARE About Biden Scandals and Bad News
FACT:
***Viewers of MSNBC and CNN are "significantly less informed" about RW Ridiculous Tinfoil Hat Conspiracies and the Current Location of Bigfoot...
^Great Findings...

 

A number of people have came forward. That should make anyone suspicious rather than just automatically dismissing it. I see several pieces of indisputable evidence that convinces me that Joe Biden is not entirely innocent. First of all, he is a liar. He claims that he knows nothing of Hunter's business when he has met with Hunter's bosses on numerous occasions. They have all those LLCs when the Hunter family has not actual businesses. There is the questionable call to the Ukraine while he was VP. It was said that the is the "Big Guy" who gets 10% off the top and Joe Biden was identified as the Big Guy. Now more people are coming forward saying he was accepting bribes.

None of this alone would be enough to convince a jury. However, it is enough to do a thorough investigation including bank records and money transfers.

 

So, let me first, perform a quick test of your consistency:

<Title Snip>
19 women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct. Carroll verdict bolsters their claims.
<End>

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/g...ssault-similar-patterns-19-women/70197377007/

These allegations, you know-- if you have, these past 7 or 8 years, been watching actual news-- are not new. If, according to your reply, "a number of people," coming forward, "should make anyone suspicious, rather than just automatically dismissing (something)," can I assume that means you have, since 2016, been suspicious that Trump is a serial sexual assaulter?
And did you, yet, vote for him? Even do so, twice?

If so, please explain how that would not seem to equate, essentially, to simply dismissing your suspicions.

 

I did not vote for Trump in 2016. I did vote for him in 2020 in preference to Joe Biden.

None of this has a thing to do with Biden. For the left, it is never about Biden. It is always about Trump.

I don't like Trump. I have never liked Trump. He can be locked up after a fair trial as far as I am concerned.

 

I watch about two hours a day of cable news. About 30 minutes of FOX, 30 minutes of CNN, 30 minutes MSNBC, and about 30 minutes of Newsmax . I feel for better or worse , I get an interesting and fairly large view of what’s going on, and how it’s all spinned.

 

I asked questions that anyone should ask about any poll. I have yet to get any answer. In my opinion Media Research Center is biased. So is Newsbusters.org. I also noticed that the poll asks about what people are aware of but ignores whether what is asked is accurate or even true.

I feel the poll is presented in order to reinforce Mr. Bozel"s political agenda with those that accept it because they want to accept it not because it iss true or even has any relevance.

 

in my 67 years, ive found the RW to focus on THEIR own issues and twist and manipulate data to fit their scenario

 

Sorry-- I should have written: "What kind of partisan questions are those? <humor>"

I of course recognized, your asking if the conductor of the poll was credible and unbiased, was a reasonable litmus. I appreciate, nonetheless, the sincerity of your reply.