Dinesh D’Souza, Creator of ‘2000 Mules,’ Must Defend Film’s Election Denial Claims in Court

The law suit was not about 'criticizing the government'.

 

No it isn't. The law was changed because of the pandemic. It was a humane decision given the circumstance of the time. And no, it affected all voters. That dems won the vote is an inadvertent fact.

 

A deluge of threats have been reported from numerous sources.

 

What we know is that overwhelming the claims harassment and fraud are lies.

 

But PSC did not have the constitutional authority to do so.

 

Whether there was voter fraud doesn't rest on the constitutionality of court decisions.

 

I just provided a source (CNN) that proves the claim is untrue.

 

Exactly. The plaintiff may get justice, but where does the American public go to get it? The harm done is irreversible, and immeasurable.

 

The supreme court of PA changed the law. The justification for it doesn't make it legal.

The law was illegally changed to benefit Biden. It's officially a rigged election when the government changes the rules to help a candidate win.

 

De Souza was criticizing the government.

 

If only he had brought some evidence along for the ride.

 

How do you figure that? What was reported by multiple outlets is threats were being made on social media platforms.

In the 24 hours since the Colorado Supreme Court kicked former President Donald Trump off the state's Republican primary ballot, social media outlets have been flooded with threats against the justices who ruled in the case, according to a report obtained by NBC News.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...threats-disqualifying-trump-ballot-rcna130720

 

But then CNN reported later:

https://x.com/Banned_Bill/status/1739758398395036073?s=20

 

No evidence is required to criticize the government. Look how the anti-Trumpers have been acting...lol

 

That wasn't what anyone claimed or anything close to what anyone claimed, but I'm glad we agree that D'Souza is a lying piece of **** that no one with two brain cells to rub together could possibly take seriously. Funny how much Trump supporters want to rely on a PROVEN election fraudster!

 

Do you believe Russia Collusion is real?

 

I believe that members of the Trump campaign attempted to do exactly what they admitted they attempted to do. And that's as far as I'm willing to follow your attempts to run and flee in terror from the actual topic. If you want to talk about the actual topic, I'm here. If you want to try to change the subject to Russian Collusion, feel free to tag me in a thread or discussion where that is the topic. I'll be happy to join in.

 

I bet you still believe Trump tried to grab the steering wheel of the presidential limo...lol.

Don't come at us with "there has to be evidence" bullshit...lol

 

I've never said anything about Trump grabbing for a steering wheel, and I'm sorry you think that evidence doesn't matter. Don't come at us with that "I can make up whatever I want and you have to pretend I'm right even if I can't provide any evidence and I'm going to throw a tantrum if you ask me for any evidence for any of my baseless claims" garbage.

 

They won a multi million dollar defamation suit against Giuliani

Apparently a jury believes their stories of being harrassed based on a preponderance of the evidence.

 

Because Trump made it OKAY to troll and harass. No consequences. This I am becoming more and more convinced is the true core of belief found Trump - that he is untouchable, that he is “Teflon Don” ergo any followers will also be magically protected from any wrongdoing whatsoever

 

A jury awarded Ruby & Shay punitive damages in the millions. Rusty Bowers and Raffensperger are republicans, and that they would lie defies credulity. You are in denial.

 

Again this is Trumps modus operandi ergo his base think it applies to them as well

 

But he lost by more than one state

 

Link to the court ruling, and I'll get back to you on that point.

But,. when the rubber hits the road, what you are saying is you want less democracy, not more, because that was all the change tried to do, was accommodate disadvantaged voters due to the pandemic, right? I mean, if more votes tended to help republicans, I doubt you would be making this argument. right? You know I'm right, so knock it off with the fake outrage.

I'm not seeing any virtue in your argument.