Dinesh D’Souza, Creator of ‘2000 Mules,’ Must Defend Film’s Election Denial Claims in Court

He wasn’t criti………. why bother there will only be yet another off base accusation by someone who has not taken time to actually read what is actually happening

 

All the fake bullshit that the Left comes up with and NOW you demand evidence?...lol

 

Irrelevant. The challenge was: "show evidence that the election was rigged". I presented evidence.

 

That doesn't mean anything...lol.

That doesn't prove they didn't participate in rigging the election.

 

Nope just that you read what is ctually happening and not post on what you THINK might be happening

 

Oh, I do...lol.

I absolutely know that you apply a different standard of "mass shooting" in Australia than you do in The United States, then rant and rave about all the mass shootings in The United States and how we need to have gun control like Australia, even though Australia has had more mass shootings since the ban than before the ban.

It's obvious what you people are doing...lol

 

those making the death threats need to be indicted, convicted and jailed. problem solved.

 

It's 11 months to the election. More than 50% of America is not even thinking about the elections at this time.

This is a civil case about lying or not. What humans think of 2000 mules is pointless. In fact, outside of political junkies, no one has heard of that movie.

 

Not 1 single person, 3 yrs later, has offered a shred of evidence of a stolen election.
Who the heck is 'we'? MAGA conspiracy theory believers?

 

No, you provided a link from a twitter account that linked to some source (logo of the source in the upper right hand corner, but they are not saying who it is) that truncated a CNN video. That is NOT the source of that video so it can't be trusted. That isn't a YouTube video and we don't even know who edited it.

Find the original, it should be on YouTube, post it, and then we'll see the full context of what was reported.

 

And in the Twitter account is a video of a CNN newscast. Did you watch it?

 

No, because the change was to accommodate voters during a Pandemic. they had no way of knowing who would win when the change was made. All they did was extend the deadline, right? Not seeing any virtue in your logic.

That PA voted for Biden is an inadvertent fact. Quit putting spin on the facts.

 

DeSouza is a liar, and is being sued for millions.

 

It's not hosted by CNN, it's hosted by someone else and it is truncated, which means it was edited.

Find the source on CNN YT site, and then I'll get back to you.

 

You'll find another reason for your denial...lol

 

Where's your evidence?

 

The reason is irrelevant. A court can't change the law

 

Nope. I accept only legitimate videos

 

As usual your one liners rarely address the more nuanced reality.

First it was originally changed with bipartisan support. It only became an issue after Biden
won. So cut the crap.

In 2019, the Pennsylvania legislature passed Act 77, which permitted no-excuse, mail-in voting. This expansion of mail voting was a significant change and was used extensively in the 2020 election. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court later upheld this law, confirming its constitutionality.

There were numerous legal challenges regarding the administration of the 2020 election in Pennsylvania. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately dismissed the last significant challenge over Pennsylvania’s 2020 election. This case was part of a series of lawsuits and appeals to the Supreme Court regarding the conduct of the election in Pennsylvania, particularly focusing on the mail-ballot deadlines extended by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. However, the U.S. Supreme Court's dismissal indicated that these legal challenges were not successful in overturning the election results or the procedures adopted for the election

While there is debate and legal opinion on both sides of this issue, the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ultimately upheld the election results and procedures suggests that the claims of illegal changes favoring Biden are not conclusively supported by the highest courts.

 

How did it specifically benefit Biden and not trump?

 

The ballots that the PA supreme court validated were cast mostly for Biden. That's how.

 

So it wasn't.

 

Not the point, by the way long time no see welcome back.

 

It's exactly the point. Changing the law does not indicate fraud.

Thanks. Did the place get crazier or is it me?

 

There are republicans and them there are never Trumpers, mostly neocons and Bushites.