Dinesh D’Souza, Creator of ‘2000 Mules,’ Must Defend Film’s Election Denial Claims in Court

The one thing that you can actually blame Trump for is the excessive partisan passion on both sides. And no the point is like it or not a hell of a lot of election laws got changed in the middle of the night an often by democrats belonging to groups that frankly had no constitutional authority to make them and almost all of those at the behest of one Democrat group or the other. Now that might not prove the existence of a rat but it sure smells like one to a hell of a lot of people. And note as already point out these legal assaults on folks whose only crime was to not believe the official government line about the election is making it look more and more like a cover up than anything else.

 

Pathetic. Bill Barr? Might as well be describing himself. He should have arrested DFT and charged him with attempting to overthrow the government of the US.

 

Lawfare Democrats.

 

Does it smell like a rat to the winners too?

Laws change all time. Doesn't amount to fraud.

 

No sir what I am saying is more votes doesn't of necessity mean more democracy.

 

The titular winners of course don't care. And the one thing you can say about those at the top of the DNC is lying and cheating is just fine.

 

But the elections were free and fair. The changing of laws doesn't mean anyone cheated.

 

To trumpers, if it goes against trump its cheating.

 

No, not 'rigging' but 'harrassement'.

The jury believes it, based on the preponderance of the evidence.

that's good enough for me. And there is far less evidence (not even a jury weighing in) on Joe Biden and you believe it.

 

It's not coming from CNN site and it's truncated.

Find the original video on a CNN website or YT channel. I'll also accept The Hill, or a reputable source, such as Yahoo, NBC, etc.

But your source is unknown, and won't show his face.

Sorry, no can do.

 

That's a cop out. My request was precise.

find a CNN source, or a reputable source, that hosted the original video, the one that is NOT truncated.

 

See the OP.

 

How so?

 

good to hear

 

People get death threats for a lot of stupid reasons. Was the individual singled out in the film?

 

Is that normal for America? It certainly is not normal here

 

I enjoyed the wording. "a CNN source, or a reputable source" implying CNN is not reputable.

 

Nor does it mean they didn't And given that most of the changes gravitated toward making cheating easier.

 

Making fraud easier guarantees more fraud.

 

The elections were free and fair. You need evidence to show fraud. Changing the law does not amount to fraud.

 

"Evidence" is conspicuously lacking in all the Loser's frequent and persistent fake claims, although blind faith in them is overwhelming among true believers.

How was the monumental heist of a "Landslide!" pulled off, and why have the Trump fanatics been impotent in filing charges against even one suspect in such a vast conspiracy?

Why is there sufficient and compelling evidence for impartial grand juries to have recommend 91 felony indictments against the Loser, while no evidence has been concocted to challenge the certified vote total of any state by any Trump worshipper anywhere in the nation in any legal or legislative venue?

​

 

I take it you don't actually know whether the individual sueing D'Souza was specifically singled out in the movie or not...

 

No, that is not what happened. The movie documented, showed actual footage, of many people, about 2000 altogether in 5 different states and cities, stuffing ballot boxes full.

As is so common of humans in denial, they judge a book by its cover.

The documentary shows how the election was manipulated.

 

I have not wasted time on D'Souza's transparently feeble propaganda. Multiple FactChecks discredited its fake claims.

Trump's AG Bill Barr laughs at Dinesh D'Souza's election conspiracy theory film '2000 Mules'

​

If the flick contained credible evidence, where are all the legal and legislative actions undertaken by Trumpy Republicans that require such credible evidence?

 

Another example of the two tiered justice system. Why don't these people have to defend their claims in court?