Israeli plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza

They were wronged when Zionists decided to drive them out by using terror tactics as Zionists did at Der Yasin and often since. Can you blame the Palestinians? I can't.

 

Patriotism has a way of being used by nationalists to advance militarism ,and there are signs of "... a new age of populism and nationalism rising in Europe..." The war racket always thrives in times of patriotism and nationalism, imho.

From 2017:

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/02/in-europe-nationalisms-rising/

"Trump’s election and Britain’s exit from the EU are 'very encouraging' to nationalist groups across Europe, 'because for the first time, there’s a shift away from international cooperation, sharing sovereignty, building international relations and organizations, to addressing the sovereign rights of specific countries,' said Grzegorz Ekiert, the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Government and director of the CES.

"Both events represent the biggest victories for the populist-nationalist right in many years.

"'They demonstrated that what most people thought was impossible is actually possible,' said Bonikowski."

 

From the beginning of the Arab Israeli conflict Arabs initiated the use of violence against the Jews. Jews fought back and won. Jews throughout the world do not need to initiate the use of violence because they can nearly always perform better than Gentiles academically and economically.

 

THAT is absolutely untrue. You are apparently a victim of Zionist propaganda. Do you even know about Der Yasin?

 

Choosing war is more true in the case of Israel and only in that way relevant to the Ethnic Cleansing been going on for 7 decades .. and who can make peace with that Jack ?! . ... except the likes of Biden and Bibi and supporters of the Cleansing of the Land .. in the Biblical sense according to Bibi and friends .. like the Amalekites .. from the River to the Sea says the Zionist Charter. .. one which Adolf favored .. and Bibi too .. and sure enough .. Biden gone declare himself a "Zionist" .. LOL .. now you must chuckle a little on that one. Biden don't know squat about what Zionism all about. .. or do he ? either way .. a dumb and dumber moment.

 

United Nations: the question of Palestine

Throughout the period of the mandate, Palestinian resentment against the denial of their inherent right of national self-determination, and against the colonization of their land by non-Palestinians, manifested itself in a series of outbreaks of violence which, becoming virtually endemic in Palestinian politics, mounted in intensity as the mandate prolonged. The British Government regularly appointed a Commission of Inquiry to investigate the “disturbances” and to present recommendations. But as long as the inherently conflicting lines of policy in the mandate were implemented, violence and resistance continued.

On 2 November 1918, non-violent protests marked the first anniversary of the Balfour Declaration. As early as April 1920, while Palestine was still under military government, anti-Jewish riots broke out just as the San Remo Conference was finalizing the allocation of the Palestine Mandate to Great Britain...

“The racial strife was begun by Arabs, and rapidly developed into a conflict of great violence between Arabs and Jews, in which the Arab majority, who were generally the aggressors, inflicted most of the casualties...

“The racial strife was begun by Arabs, and rapidly developed into a conflict of great violence between Arabs and Jews, in which the Arab majority, who were generally the aggressors, inflicted most of the casualties...

The “Churchill Memorandum” reaffirmed the “national home” policy, and Palestinian resentment again broke out into violence in August 1929, sparked by a dispute over the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem.

“The outbreak was not premeditated or expected, nor was either side prepared for it; but the state of popular feeling made a conflict likely to occur on any provocation by any Jews...

A special Commission, headed by Sir Walter Shaw, a retired Chief Justice of the Straits Settlements, investigated this outbreak. The Shaw Commission observed:

“In less than 10 years three serious attacks have been made by Arabs on Jews...

The riots of 1933
In 1933, the Nazis took power in Germany, and their imminent infamous persecution of Jewry brought an exodus of Jews from Germany and other European countries. Large numbers came to Palestine, exciting the already simmering resentment again into violence...

In 1920, 1921 and 1929 the Arabs had attacked the Jews. In 1933 they attacked the Government...

There were attacks on British troops and police posts as well as on Jewish settlements, sabotage of roads, railways, pipelines and so on...

https://www.un.org/unispal/history2/origins-and-evolution-of-the-palestine-problem/part-i-1917-1947/

The Arabs initiated the use of violence. The Jews fought back and won. That has been the story of the Arab - Israeli conflict. Jews would rather compete intellectually. When they are attacked they prove that they are good at fighting too.

 

Nationalism is useful, for example, in crisis situations, when one's country is threatened by an enemy (even from within). But in peacetime, nationalism is rather harmful.

 

The current proceedings at the International Court of Justice at the Hague are a farce, hypocritical, and an insult to the concept of justice. Charges of genocide brought by the government of South Africa against Israel are a perfect example of anti-Israel bias and anti-Semitism. The basic right and responsibility of a nation to defend itself against attack from Hamas which is a terrorist organization which controls Gaza which hides behind a civilian population is denied by South Africa. Israel is absolutely within its rights to defend its citizens against Hamas and absolutely correct in its current strategy to completely destroy Hamas in Gaza which will benefit both Israeli and Gazan civilians.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/south-...ext=South Africa charges,South Africa’s farce.

 

Actually, your post is a perfect example how Jews and pro Israeli just label that all and any criticism against a country is "anti-Israel" and "anti-Semitism".
South Africa is totally in it's right to drag any country to the international court it wants.
While no country has a right to commit a genocide.

The massacre the Jews controlling Israel are making in Gaza is already bigger than the mass bombing campaign the nazi's unleashed in London. Do note, the nazi's bombed for 9 months. The Jews made a bigger massacre in 100 days. This is on those Jews who did that, and those who support it. The entire idea that the Jew is taking civilian life into account, is therefor just propaganda where the facts tell a completely different story.

 

Hamas is responsible for all deaths in Gaza. They fire rockets from civilian neighborhoods. The have publicly admitted that their strategy is the use of human shields so that Israel will be blamed and accused of genocide. It is Hamas whose stated objective is killing Jews and destroying Israel. It’s clear that Hamas should have been brought to the Hague by South Africa, not Israel.

 

The Jews controlling the Israeli government have openly said they to go genocidal. Netanyahu himself dragged in his Torah with his “You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible. And we do remember.”. This is a reference to the first Book of Samuel to kill every person in Amalek, a rival nation to ancient Israel. And that Jew is far from the only one at the top yelling this kind of war criminal rhetoric.

And you're free to prove where it says that when you're committing the worst kind of a war crimes, that you can just pin the blame on a 3rd party. Because all you're doing now is just parroting the propaganda from the Jews controlling Israel.

 

In 1948 the Israelis accepted the UN partition. The Arabs rejected it, and began the war.

 

In 1948 the Israelis accepted the UN partition. The Arabs rejected it and began the war.

 

This is the real history of Amalek. The strategy of Israel to completely eradicate Hamas in Gaza has nothing to with the attacks in the desert after the Children of Israel fled from Egypt.

https://www.jta.org/2024/01/16/isra...he Amalekites mercilessly,dead are combatants.

 

In 1948 the UN offered the partition to give both Israelis and Arabs a place to live. The Israelis accepted the partition and peace; the Arabs chose war, and have been choosing war ever since.

 

Got it backwards again CD .. From the beginning the Israelites Initiated the use of violence against the Arabs, their Canaanite Brothers and sisters back in the day... committing genocide against the Amalek (Arabs) "From the River to the Sea"

and what on Earth is this nonsense about Arabs initiating the recent violence .. What a nonsensical backwards Joke that is friend.. did you never hear of the Nakba Ethnic Cleansing of the Palestinians in 1948 ?

Time for you and Google to spend some time together ... then come back and tell us all about how the Zionists initiated the violence.

 

Run along now Jack .. Don't like discourse with those who run to the mods at the slightest offense

 

https://twitter.com/cybermuslim313/status/1748386258035073307
☝️

 

Please read post 3439 for the history of the Amalekites attacking the Jews on their way out of Egypt. Once again Israel defends itself and is blamed for it.

 

I know well the history of the Amalek -- Ethnically Cleansed by the Israelites .. from the River to the Sea, eradicated like animals .. like a pesky weed.

What more did you have to add to Bibi's proclamation of his intent to cleanse the land of the Palestinian vermin ?

 

You're quoting the Fox regarding the destruction of the hen house. The perpetrators will always defend what they did. You don't seem to know anything about Der Yasin, which is just the one example of Israeli terrorism to drive Palestinians out and steal their land.

 

I have no idea what you're going on about.

 

I guess if the UN or IMF or IJC issued a partition of the US for Russia you would expect and approve of Russia accepting it and you would object to Americans rejecting it? That's equivalent to what you're doing. You assume conveniently that Britain and the UN had a right to give away what was not theirs to give, and you show contempt for victims who object.

 

The UN had every right, an obligation in fact, to act on Britain's expiring League of Nations mandate in Palestine. There was no state there. The UN offered a proposal to be fair to all. Your analogy is false.

 

All wrong. Palestinians lived there and they were driven out, terrorized, and killed to clear the way for "Israel". You are arguing the same arguments we heard from the colonists who did the same to the American Indians. Repetition doesn't make it ok.