Fani In The Hot Seat: Former Harvard Professor Warns DA Willis May Have Committed Perjury

Fani In The Hot Seat: Former Harvard Professor Warns DA Willis May Have Committed Perjury



"The fact that there are no records and the payments all have records but the repayments have no records gives rise to a plausible interpretation that that’s not true..."

'Fulton County’s district attorney may have lied under oath last week during hours of testimony in court to determine whether she would be disqualified from prosecuting a case in Georgia against former President Donald Trump.'

'there was at least one witness who testified that their relationship occurred much earlier than what Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis claimed' under oath.

She's corrupt.
She's part of the lawfare operation against Trump.
They are trying to rig the election through lawfare.
It will be interesting to see if her efforts to destroy Trump, destroy herself.

 

You seem to think that disqualification of Willis would end the case against Trump. Sorry. It would simply be turned over to someone else. The Grand Jury recommended the case proceed.
Case delayed, but not terminated.

 

She's already been disqualified from prosecuting someone regarding these events and nobody picked up her torch after she fumbled it. This case had already been on thin ice for similar reasons that she was previously disqualifed such as campaigning and fundraising based on this prosecution. The defense was told to hold off on disqualification efforts until after the indictments drop. Well they've dropped and there's only more problems now.

 

The Supreme Court just upheld a lower court ruling that "The Kracken" and the other lawyers who were spouting stolen election bull crap
can be held criminally and civilly liable for their actions.

 

I understand why you're saying this in relationship to your prior post or my response. It's completely irrelevant.

You: Disqualification of Fani wouldn't end the case against Trump.
Me: The last time she was disqualified from prosecuting a suspect nobody picked up the prosecution.
You: Something about the Supreme Court ruling on a different issue on a different case.

 

You fail to see the connection. The Supreme Court backs the fact that Trump's minion tried to steal the election. That
means the SC would agree that there was illegal actions by the President's advisors in Georgia. That means
there is a case that Trump was involved and higher courts are less likely to overturn a conviction.

 

I understand the connection you're trying to make; it's just a false and foolish one.

The Supreme Court didn't "just uphold" anything. They declined to take a case; learn the difference. The appeal was specifically about a procedural conflict. It has nothing to do with the Georgia case. It was also about a civil case, not a criminal one. Nothing you're saying makes any sense whatsoever. So why not try to stick to the topic rather than going off on unrelated tangents while butchering the concept you're trying to divert the conversation to?

It's okay to admit you were wrong about something rather than introducing new arguments to be wrong about. It's usually better to not say anything at all rather than continue to make mistakes.

 

If they find someone who wants to take the case.

 

Fani Willis Has a Harrowing Week

Was getting regularly plowed.

'A judge in Georgia will weigh this week whether to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in the election fraud case against former President Donald Trump and 14 others accused of conspiring to overturn his 2020 election loss.'

'Trump and several of his co-defendants are hoping to convince a judge that the relationship between Willis and her hired special prosecutor, Nathan Wade, created a conflict of interest that should result in disqualifying Willis’s entire office from handling the case. The core question before the judge is whether Willis financially benefited from hiring Wade, who has been paid more than $650,000 in taxpayer funds for his work on the case.'

Wade appears to have been billing the GA taxpayer for plowing Fani, and Fani was approving the plowing hours for reimbursement by the GA taxpayer.

'The core question before the judge is whether Willis financially benefited from hiring Wade, who has been paid more than $650,000 in taxpayer funds for his 'work' on the case.'