Federal judge accuses the DOJ of hypocrisy for ‘flouting’ Biden impeachment inquiry subpoenas

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Bluesguy, Apr 6, 2024.

  1. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,487
    Likes Received:
    20,875
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    no, they wanted some hard core leftist but they weren't going to get that. and Thomas only barely was confirmed
     
  2. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,164
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You>> Congress can certainly look at private citizens. The famous instance of Joe McCarthy and the Committee on Un-American Activities is the most obvious example.

    Me>> You mean the HOUSE Committee on Un-American Activities?

    Really? McCarthy headed up the HOUSE Committee on Un-American Activities?

    You might want to check your history McCarthy was not in the HOUSE he was in the SENATE. He was concerned with government officials who had been compromised or otherwise held sympathetic views towards the Soviets and world communism. As the Verona intercepts proved, he was mostly correct.
     
  3. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,167
    Likes Received:
    6,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Correct about what ? All the innocent Americans that appeared in front of his committee and the HCUA ? And he was NOT correct, he was grandstanding to advance his personal political career at the expense many good Americans. His method was character assassination by innuendo. Just like Gomer and his gomeretttes.

    Yes, SENATOR McCarthy was on a CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE (the Government Operations Committee, chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations) that looked at individuals.

    You are correct that he was NOT on the HCUA although both committees did great harm to many innocent individuals.
     
  4. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,087
    Likes Received:
    9,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What records ? Again, this is their private business, and there is literally no evidence of any wrongdoing. You righties have been making these “we have the goods” claims for almost 4 years now, and you still have literally nothing. We KNOW THIS because if they really had it, they would have used it and removed Biden.

    BAHAHAHA……the “we are working on it” defense…….WAIT, I thought you already had it ?

    HUH ?


    Your comparing apples to transmission…..JFC

    Hunter isn't the POTUS

    YES, Hunter is going to trial. I have said all along that if hunter did something wrong, he should be punished. There is no proof Joe had anythign to do with any of this. You righties are amazing in your ability to believe anything no matter what evidence is presented to you.
     
  5. hawgsalot

    hawgsalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,598
    Likes Received:
    9,693
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    LOL it's what they do!
     
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,164
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The records the committee has been seeking. Yes there is evidence as the career IRS invstigaors testified and what bank records we do have show.

    But prove me wrong and post the rebuttal evidence.


    I can't help you don't know what is gking in get yourself some better news sources.


    Nope and his father is and what he was peddling.

    YES so stop with the denials. And get up to speed in the testimony and records we already have.
     
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,164
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You know so little about it you thought McCarthy was in tge House were the private individuals were investigated when he eas in the Senate which investigated internal infiltration by communist supporters. And he was mostly correct.
     
  8. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,087
    Likes Received:
    9,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    “Prove you wrong” ? JFC YOU made the accusation, and there is no evidence. YOU are the one who has to prove it since YOU made the accusation.. If you had the goods he would be impeached. You have nothing….move on…

    My news source didn’t pay a BILLION $$$ fine for LYING ;)


    AGAIN…show your evidence. Your accusation requires YOU to have the proof…..now show us

    You have NOTHING or you would have impeached him already and you know it. JFC you’re embarrasing yourself here claiming to have something you don’t have, and then telling everyone THEY need to prove you wrong. Show us the actual evidence and then we can debate. Until then you just keep embarrasing yourself…
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2024
  9. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,167
    Likes Received:
    6,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Coming from someone who insists Bill Clinton pled to a crime , you are hardly one to claim who was correct about what.
    Yes, McCarthy was a junior senator on the SENATE committee and HCUA was over in the House. Whopee.

    And McCarthy was mostly wrong and got his comeuppance for it. Deservedly so since he was pandering for political power, kind of like Gomer and his gomerettes are doing.

    Absilutely vile excuses for human beings.
     
  10. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,164
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As was proven in that thread and many others and you could not refute......feel free to take it up again there when you can.


    YES a HUGE mistake on your part they each investigate different matters and as the Verona intercepts showed McCarthy was mostly right about the communist infiltration into the government. The so-called blacklisting was in the House.

    And McCarthy was mostly wrong and got his comeuppance for it. Deservedly so since he was pandering for political power, kind of like Gomer and his gomerettes are doing.

    Absilutely vile excuses for human beings.[/QUOTE]
     
  11. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,164
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Accusatuon with the evidence and obviously you have nothing to refute it.



    Then why do you parrot theirs?



    Again it has been repeatedly posted and the testimonies are publically available to you since obviously you did not pay attwntion to them.

    Again where is your evidence refuting it. If you have none then it stands.


    Oh stop with the phony canard there is in impeachment IN PROGRESS and the Bidens are STILL refusing to cooperate and turn over any records to refute the evidence against them. Hunter even refusing to testify publically now afer his previous stunts.
     
  12. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,087
    Likes Received:
    9,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have no evidence. You just make it up in your head and then try to make everyone “refute” the voices in your head

    HUH. My news sources did not pay a BILLION $$$$ fine for lying. YOU need to get more reliable sources. Next thing you will be posting from TuckerCarlson.com

    JFC man. You dont get to pull crap out of thin air and then claim if fact. Thats not how this works. You make an accusation YOU need to back it up. HO very Fox News of you to start from “prove me wrong”…..

    THERE IS NO EVIDENCE that is what you keep glossing over. You righties fascinate me with this ideal that you can make things up and then claim them fact.

    Try this in a court of law. Go ahead, you and Mike Johnson go to a court and say,

    Bluesguy:Your honor Joe Biden shot a man on 5th ave.
    Judge: do you have any evidence, a body, a gun, ANYTHING?
    Bluesguy: But Your honor, he shot a guy
    Judge: What guy ?
    Bluesguy: The guy I just told you about
    Judge: WHAT GUY, WHAT BODY, do you have any evident at all
    Bluesguy: Your Honor, you have to prove that it never happened or someone has to go to jail..

    JFC
     
  13. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,164
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Bank records, emails, text messages, videos, letters, testiminy from career IRS RICO and fraud investigators, testimony if the business partners.......and you hage nothing to refuted them just your long dead simple dismissals.
     
  14. fullmetaljack

    fullmetaljack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    8,167
    Likes Received:
    6,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There is nothing to refute.
    Gomer and his gomerettes can't get a single article of impeachment passed based on all your toilet paper and testimony.
    The DOJ , quite rightly, doesn't believe a word of it since it was created by rightie partisans on a political hit job which also includes perjured testimony.

    Now excuse us while we present real evidence in a court of law( 3 actually) in front of a judge and a jury on real indictments of the Orange Stain.
    You might want to take notes and learn about something called "due process".
     
  15. grapeape

    grapeape Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2015
    Messages:
    17,087
    Likes Received:
    9,467
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then show us all these things....seriously...Post them here and we will all debate them......just show us since you claim they exist
     
  16. Nwolfe35

    Nwolfe35 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    5,391
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It couldn't have been because of his legal record since McConnell announced that he was going to refuse to hold hearings on ANY nominee before the nominee was even announced.
     
    The Mello Guy likes this.

Share This Page