I'm no stock expert, but DJT goin' down, eh?

So, you're just making it all up.
Thx.

And basing your make up on people's opinions.

But when I used your link to show you your opinion is wrong. You dismissed it because it was just someone's opinion.

 

I made up nothing. Show me what I made up.
I look at what has happened. Numerous contacts with Hunter's bosses and denying it. Numerous LLC shell companies with no real businesses. Numerous aliases. Several people saying he was receiving bribes, etc. None proof in themselves, but enough to make most people suspicious because none of these have really been explained.

 

When did he claim that her had never personally met anyone who ever worked with Hunter? What is suspicious about the LLCs? The only person I heard say he saw bribery was a lying piece of **** who later admitted that he never even really met Joe Biden or started working with Hunter until Joe was no longer in office. Now THAT is suspicious.

 

His exact words were that he knew nothing of Hunter's business which is a bit hard to believe considering all the times he talked with them.

 

Does this mean you finally figured out I was right and you were wrong? I did provide three links.

Should I teach you how to find links?

 

You made all the above claims.
Now you admit it's only some people's opinions.

That's why you've not shown 1 single shred of proof.

 

Your link, as I pointed out to you. Showed you to be wrong. But you blew your own link off because it was a person's opinion.\

And the rest of your supposed proof is more of the same. People's opinions. Which you admit to not trusting.

 

I never made up a thing. They are not opinions. They are facts. Are you claiming that all those meets with Hunter's bosses are just opinions?

There were three links.

 

3 links.
How about you point out in any one of your links, the proof you have claimed?

Just 1.

 

I have never claimed I had proof. I claimed that a number of Biden's actions were suspicious. There are a total of three links in the following quote. If you cannot find all three links, let me know and I will show you how to find links.

 

Got it. Someone's opinion.
Which you have previously disspelled people's personal opinions.

And your other proof is people visited the VP. Is that not normal for VPs to have visitors?

 

It is no opinion that Biden met with Hunter's bosses, talked with them on the phone numerous times and exchanged emails. It is well documented.

So you think it is normal for a son's bosses to meet with the dad numerous times, sit in on phone calls numerous times and exchange emails?

 

Where's the evidence? Besides someone's opinion?

 

So I guess according to your logic, anything we read in the newspaper or hear on CNN, they are just opinions.

From Ask AI.
"Evidence of Hunter Biden’s business associates visiting Joe Biden in the White House:

There are several reports indicating that Hunter Biden’s business associates visited Joe Biden at the White House during his tenure as Vice President. Here are some examples:

1. In February 2014, then-Vice President Biden met with two of Hunter’s Mexican business associates at the White House (AP, 2023).
2. In October 2015, Hunter arranged a video call between his father and Mexican business partners, and later that month, then-Vice President Biden hosted Mexican business partners and a Biden associate at the Vice President’s official residence (AP, 2023).
3. In February 2016, then-Vice President Biden allowed Hunter and a Biden associate to fly to Mexico on Air Force 2 to meet with business partners (AP, 2023).
4. According to an FBI report from June 30, 2020, there were allegations that then-Vice President Joe Biden engaged in an extortion scheme where he was paid $5 million in exchange for certain actions (CNN, 2020). The report does not provide details on who the associates were or what the actions entailed.

It is important to note that while these reports suggest that Hunter Biden’s business associates visited Joe Biden at the White House, they do not necessarily imply that Joe Biden was involved in or aware of his son’s business dealings. However, the frequent interactions between the two raise questions about the extent of their professional relationship during Joe Biden’s time in office."

References:

• AP. (2023). New poll: Americans sharply divided over whether Biden acted wrongly in son’s businesses. Retrieved April 28, 2024, from https://apnews.com/article/joe-bide...ess-dealings-e9c7d6f8a9d7a8e6f5d9c5a7e9b7f68c
• CNN. (2020). FBI investigating ‘potential counterintelligence and extortion’ aspects of Hunter Biden laptop material. Retrieved April 28, 2024, from https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/hunter-biden-laptop/index.html

 

A link from 2020. trump as president.

It's now 2024. Where's the indictment. Oh. Your sources are people's opinions.

 

According to your logic, all sources are opinions.

 

I did not realize that you were that unknowledgeable about facts. Facts don't change.

 

Don't be silly.
It was your source where I showed from your own source as being wrong.
And you deemed it someones opinion.

According to you, all your sources are opinions. And you even stated as such.

 

You seem to not realize many things.
So I'm not surprised.

Fact is, your 2020 link from trump presidency, didn't do anything at all to biden.
In fact, he lost the election to biden because your links are nothing but BS.

I am knowledgeable. That's why I have posted people's opinions as proof as you've done throughout this debate.

 

Let me understand something. Do you believe that Joe Biden met with Hunter's bosses and participated in telecons with Hunters bosses multiple times?

Specifically what am I wrong about? I have never said Biden was guilty of anything. I have only said that his well documented actions make me suspicious.

 

Sure... prove it wrong

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2014-Cafe-Milano-Dinner-768x768.png
https://oversightdemocrats.house.go...dum re Archer Transcribed Interview Final.pdf
https://bidenreport.com/#p=179

 

No. I've seen no proof of such meetings.
I don't believe people's opinions, just like you said. Yet you still believe people's opinions, if you agree with them.

There's no well documented anything. Other than people's opinions.

 

You do realize that the majority of shell companies (of which the Trumps have waaaay more than the Bidens, by the way) are perfectly legal, by the way, right? What about these are suspicious. Pick a specific one and tell us. We'll wait.

 

So, numerous newspaper and network news are not enough? Find me a single source that says it is not true, besides you.

 

Trump has some legitimate businesses which might require LLC and shell companies to distribute profits. The Biden family has none that I know of.