And the corresponding temperature change that accompanied them? They don't like discussing that...and won't...until the archaeologists discover...
With the help of the friendly natural gas industry, and the development of clean burning, inexpensive and quite abundant methane to replace coal...
It doesn't. The seas have risen some 300+ feet since the end of the last ice age, getting all flustered over something that has been going on...
There is no requirement for those $2T to come back here to fund a Trump supply side recovery. GovCo policy since Reagan (and including him)...
Regardless of the temperature it operates at, the world will still be here after we are gone. Humans adapted to the global +15C environment about...
Unlikely. Reagan had the stagflation of the 1970's to launch from, Trump is launching from a low growth period, and because of Obama's borrowing...
Those all happened because of coal fired power plants that the archaeologists just haven't discovered the remnants of yet.
Fortunately, those who use data don't reside in the denier camp. It is one of the beauties of science, that try as folks might, when someone is...
Trust science? Sure. I pick the science to trust that says Greenland has been getting colder. Color me surprised when zealots come out of the...
I'd be happy if they would point out the correlation matrix they used to manufacture the temperature profile, prior to discussing any potential...
So this is average temps in Idaho for the past century. I guess global warming isn't over the whole earth then either? [img] Funny how folks...
A temperature for 2014 was certainly CREATED. And if "recorded history" during the Pleistocene didn't encompass the equivalent of 7 seconds of a...
That is more than a little amusing, isn't it?
Not really. You see, followers want to BELIEVE (almost doesn't matter sometimes what in), it isn't the fault of the scientists that there are many...
I certainly said nothing about fraud. If you feel it has been committed feel free to share. You buy into results you like because A) you admire...
Science involves analyzing data, and more particularly, knowing when and why data is biased for some reason. A simple example...take a temperature...
Depends on how they do the correction. For example, if they don't provide raw data, but just the "corrected" data, there is room for suspicion. If...
They don't CHANGE raw data. They correct it, average, aggregate, correlate, interpolate and extrapolate and assume things to it and about it. And...
They do far…far MORE than that to the data. But those who don't ask questions, aren't equipped to ask questions, and can only bite hook,...
Well, I'm not sure folks go for politicization first, and the dismissal of results second. As climate scientists have informed us, they each must...
I would instantly doubt the magnitude of that uncertainty around a mean answer. Based on the magnitude of uncertainty that can be demonstrated...
Interesting that the supplied focus point are the extreme's, as compared to the very insidious issue of trending. You see, part of Hansen's game...
Based on the span of assumed correlation provided previously, would any one like to venture a guess, or their own empirical work, as to the...
Funny. As though you have? Funnier still, as though you even know what science IS?
So you are making the point that not only do you not read (let alone understand) any of the science references you provide around here, but you...
Separate names with a comma.
