who did the semitic tribe that calls themselves jews throw out of canaan? so-called scripture, any so-called scripture, serves the purpose of...
you are welcome to your opinion, inaccurate though it may be.
again, no. america will not evaporate. but the america of the '50's is long gone despite your desire to live there. what is changing is the...
umm, no. the statement "...to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's...
since you already took an oath what purpose is served beyond that? - - - Updated - - - what was the time frame for the formation of oathkeepers?
deleted.
divine mandate? and what divine mandate might that be?
then test the limits of my perception by providing said definition. tap-dancing around it while not providing it may give you some exercise but it...
ok. i can see that particular point. i should have separated the two. as relates to the concept of the oathkeepers and their agenda it doesn't...
wow. a lot to unpack here. first perhaps you can define socialist/socialism. and when you do you might then want to come back and discuss what the...
check again. you do not have to assume anything should you not desire. however logic does follow. i do not subscribe to oathkeepers as being...
my politics/economics/social theory is very simple. it stems from the unstable spherical system of the whole.
since you lack either understanding or the ability to formulate what defending a document means we must assume that whatever the oathkeepers swore...
yes, you miss the point of the question. so i will ask it again. what, exactly, does protect and defend the constitution mean? is the government...
pursuing "the enemy." which enemy? the small group that calls itself "al-qaeda in wherever?" the small group in indonesia or pakistan or somalia...
There is no indication that al-Shabab defeated the SEALs. There is no evidence in the post or any link to indicate that their target was there....
ummm. the republic is set up in that precise manner. so-called free people (please define) vote for politicians who then pack off to washington to...
and you would roll those dice, ethereal?
and of course they would never implement an authoritarian system of their own... or would they?
it means whatever they wish it to mean. it is called agitprop, newspeak, doublespeak, fill-in-the-blank. what it actually means is psychological...
perhaps someone can define what "defend the constitution" means. when that happens it will be interesting to see where that fits in the theology...
all religions claim their's is the "true faith." thus there is no true faith. sadly any and all attempts to merge "god's will" into politics...
when you mix politics and religion you get politics. just about the worst thing anyone can say is that their actions are "god's will." as...
precisely. the use of "the other" is critical in this case.
the purpose of portraying martin as not being a saint is what?
Separate names with a comma.