SCOTUS doesn't make law. Never has.
That is what needs to be determined.
I see you have yet to quote directly where anyone is arguing for wanting a king. I'll take that as an admission that your are just expressing your...
I have. Have you? You'll see that I've posted the video of the arguments in post 209, you're free to listen in. And through out the thread I've...
Yep, nowhere does any of the arguments mention "wanting a king". Nor do I want one. So, try again.
Mind showing me people saying that they want a king?
Do you think our system of Justice should be swayed by such?
You need to listen to more than just one line. The "absolute immunity" that is being talked about is only in relation to a President acting in...
Again, what is being argued before SCOTUS has nothing to do with "absolute immunity". Maybe instead of listening to a talking mouth you should...
Irrelevant to what is actually before SCOTUS. So when you said.... ...you were wrong...going by your own words.
There is far more evidence of rogue prosecutors than there is of rogue Presidents. That isn't even debatable. And its not the system that makes...
About the only time I could see it applying is if POTUS is incapacitated and the VP is temp-Prez (or fully becomes Prez). Under normal...
There is no argument before SCOTUS of "absolute immunity". That is a lie spread by leftist propaganda. But here is an example that shows that...
Because what Nixon did was not within the bounds of a Presidential Act. It was a Personal Act. As I've explained already it is Presidential Acts...
You're right. It doesn't. But it IS inferred. Like many things that we consider "Rights" in this country are inferred. And why the Federal...
Only those that buy into the leftist propaganda "don't know".
Impeachment clause. You've already been told this :rolleyes: Really? Lets test that out. Do you support abortion rights?
The immunity has always been there. Nothing will change. And the examples given are the extreme's. Not likely to happen...and if they ever...
Which is exactly what we have going on now. The question of immunity is before SCOTUS. Yet here you are hollering about it in this thread saying...
The poster I was responding to wants Congress to write a law detailing what a President could be immune for prosecution for. I was challenging...
So, you admit that its not so simple a legislation to write as you tried to make it out to be? Thanks.
You do know that it came from Biden's daughters own diary, a diary which we KNOW was in reporters hands due to the FBI raids. That alone is...
Not at a point where they remember and put it in a diary. They'd do it when their child is just a baby, but after at the most 2 years old (most...
What is considered a "genuine threat"?
Keep trying. For instance, what/who/how can someone be deemed an "enemy"?
Separate names with a comma.