So in other words, a critique unrelated to her gender.
Okay, so what is the basis that Democrats would have for opposing her, then?
In the absence of filling Ginsburg's seat it's unlikely that enough Democrats would be brought on board with the idea of expanding court seats....
Practically speaking, I'm not sure what mechanism there is within impeachment that would stop the Senate from confirming anybody they want.
Over this? No. I expect Democrats to use all the legal levers of power at their disposal to stop or neutralize an appointment. If there is an...
Gentlemen's Agreements like filibusters, blue slips and the mutually agreed-upon numbers of judges on courts are over, for better or worse (worse...
And precisely what rationale do you expect Democrats will have for opposing a trump nominee, regardless of that person’s gender?
How was my post at odds with the article?
This appointee's gender has absolutely no bearing on how Democrats will respond to confirming a Justice. If you think it's supposed to then...
"Radical" for a Democrat is the equivalent of using the powers at one's disposal like Republicans do. For example, if all of the roles were...
I have a serious problem with the economic disparity explanation, and frankly I've been given no reason to buy it and every reason to think it's...
Simple Congressional majority and the political will to make it happen. Also necessary: a strong sense of an outcome that doesn't necessarily...
Imagine trying to explain to a person living in another democracy why a judge dying of old age determines national policy for the next fifty years...
Just checking out the digs here. Howdy.
If Republicans ram through a replacement (and they will), they will radicalize Democrats. And if Democrats retake the Senate and the White House...
Separate names with a comma.
