Posts 365 and 368. Republicans want to rewrite 260. Democrats do not. And reforms such as they have in Europe cannot happen in the US without Democrat support.
It was a simple statement. Parler weren't doing anything that Twitter or FB continue to do. If you can't recognize that, you have no credibility.
I thought it was humorous that the left wanted Parler to transition to a publisher like FB and Twitter or else... and they got the "or else"
Parler was relying on its users to report sketchy posts and relying on the intelligence of its users to read content expressing all points of view and decide for themselves. Twitter, Facebook, Wikipedia, and Google censor and remove opinion and fact which go against the prevailing progressive narratives.
That is the post with quotes and references to CNN and Allum Bokhari. And again no discussion of that but only another silly Q deflection?
Which do absolutely nothing to prove your Q-Claims. When did the government promise social media to never take legal action against them if they promise to delete conservative content (which you define as porn, anti-semitism and plotting violence)? I keep asking for proof, and you can't provide it.
All? No, I keep asking you the same question. I have asked you three times to back up your claims, but you always respond with this kind of deflection. That is how you earned your first 'Q'.
I did, and asked a question (three times), which you refuse to answer. How about you answer as opposed to giving me this chicken dance.
You have all the information. But refuse to discuss it. Instead deflection. #365 & #368. Discuss point by point.
I am trying to discuss, but you won't answer the questions, so it leaves nothing to discuss. Your habit of making baseless claims and then refusing to back them up makes this a waste of time. Go ahead and make more "fire and forget" claims, but don't expect me to waste my time again. Trying to get an answer from you is like pulling duck's teeth. Ducks dont have teeth, so its a mission impossible.
Yes, I have been asking you to back up the claim you made in #368 about the Congress striking a "deal" with social media so they would delete conservative content. However, I have given up on it, so no worries.
The Democrats refuse to support legislation such as they have in Europe in exchange for censoring right wing content. It's very simple and easy to understand. All the back up is in #365 and #368.
No idea about the poster's Q claims - or even if it is Dems putting pressure on Social Media. What we do know - is that spooks have been showing up - that congress has been threatening these companies - forcing them to censure content. and this is a problem - be it Red or Blue doing it - and it is both sides pushing this ball home. It is true that the Social Media Giants have been more biased in their censorship of the right - but then the Right should do something about it - and they are not sfar as I can tell - least not in general. See that Trump managed not to Pardon Snowden ? - Assange ? What's up with that ? On the list of a True Patriot - those two should be high up.