Democrat Data Firm Says Trump Landslide Likely on Election Day – But will Be Flipped to Biden by Mai

A top Democrat data and analytics firm funded by Michael Bloomberg claimed it is highly likely President Trump will win by a landslide on election night, but will ultimately lose in the following days after mail-in ballots continue to be counted. Once 75% of mail ballots were counted, perhaps four days later, the lead could flip to Biden’s favor.This particular modeling scenario portrays Biden as ultimately winning a massive victory, 334-204.The methodology was based in part on polling from FiveThirtyEight in August.The ultimate results may well sit somewhere between these low-end and high-end scenarios and will also be impacted by who actually votes, and how voters’ views about their options change over the coming weeks. Nothing fishy about this, right? The Democrats are rigging the election in plain sight and are using an old Alinsky tactic. They'll appear prophetic by telling us in advance how it's going to happen and between now and the election we will hear over and over how Biden will win. The idea being by repeating this message the electorate will begin to believe that its true. After all they have done to Trump for four years, do you trust them?

 

Source?

 

Of course. Dems cannot win without voter fraud.

 

. https://www.axios.com/bloomberg-gro...ios-a554e8f5-9702-437e-ae75-d2be478d42bb.html

 

Hillary already told Biden not to concede no matter what.

she and other liberals just want to create chaos and undermine the election process. It’s so transparently obvious.

 

I firmly believe that no matter what amount of cheating goes on by the left, Trump wins.

 

And exactly what would you call the Dirty Donald and DeJoy USPS chicanery ???

 

Something like 70% of Democrats but only 25% of Republicans plan to vote by mail. That's why the model appears accurate.

 

Those numbers are meaningless this far out. The Dem's pollster is already claiming a Biden win because of mail in voting. Under different circumstances, if Covid 19 never happened and the majority of voting was done in person it's hard yo see a Biden win. So how does mail in voting change the game? Shame on the Dem's for foisting another shady scheme on America, the election results could take many months to tally. You have to know there's going to be endless challenges from both sides. This is effing crazy. If Trump hits 270 on election night it's game over right? Not if the Dem's have anything to say about it.

 

Lol, let's sum up the OP again: "Trump will only lose once we count all the votes! Counting all the votes is fraud!" This is just getting more and more hilarious.

 

Umm, no.

 

Biden is predicted to win because of the polls, not mail voting, and no, those numbers are not going to change. The model is based on the time it will take to count mail votes. There is nothing wrong with the model that I can see.

 

There was nothing wrong with the 2016 models either, remember how that turned out?

 

Polls only predict popular vote, and the average of the polls in 2016 was very, very accurate in that regard.

 

No it wasn't accurate, Hillary lost, that wasn't supposed to happen. The fact you folks still believe in their broken methodology is hilarious...

 

I don't think that many republicans are likely to vote by mail this election. Everyone I have spoken with is going to be at the polls no matter what.

 

Try again. This time actually read my post before responding. I'll try to type slower.

Polls predict POPULAR VOTE
Hillary win POPULAR VOTE
Polls right about POPULAR VOTE

I don't know how to make this simpler without resorting to smoke signals. Please at least try reading this time.

 

So far no research has shown a big difference in political allegiance when it comes to mail-in voting. If anything, it is more popular with older, more conservative populations.

 

Do you just pull this stuff out of the ether and post it up with no evidence or what? What research, by whom, paid for by what organization?

 

If you think there is actually research out there that says otherwise, feel free to provide it and let us know by whom, and paid for by what organization.

 

So you are telling us that Democrats are so stupid they paid millions of dollars to get information that was totally worthless and irrelevant in an election determined by the electoral college? Why would anyone be dumb enough to vote Democrat?

 

Sorry there chap, burden of proof is on you. I didn't make an unfounded assertion, you did.

 

Try again. This time read. Trying to give you another chance here. I used the simplest sentences I could. Please try to read.

 

The difference is Hillary might have won with the added flim flam of mailed in (strictly legitimate wink wink) votes.

 

Of course not.