YES. It is inconvenient to subject one's body to 9 months of gestation with all the dangers and permanent damage it does to one's body. It IS inconvenient to suffer financial loss. It is inconvenient to suffer possible job loss and career setbacks. It IS inconvenient to then face the denigration and ridicule of those who think you and your CHILD do NOT deserve any help..... they are not CONVENIENT …. Now YOU may go through life doing everything as Inconveniently as possible but is that sane??
Sorry, but I don't see a point here. There are no "pro-abortion rightists". In fact I don't know anybody who is pro-abortion. What difference does it make to anything that you don't know any woman who rose out of poverty after having an abortion??? It didn't even have anything to do with the post you responded to... Are you claiming you know all women who have had abortions?? And how ALL their lives progressed afterwards? WTF !
FoxHastings ::Sorry, but I don't see a point here. There are no "pro-abortion rightists". In fact I don't know anybody who is pro-abortion. What difference does it make to anything that you don't know any woman who rose out of poverty after having an abortion??? It didn't even have anything to do with the post you responded to... Are you claiming you know all women who have had abortions?? And how ALL their lives progressed afterwards? WTF ! They are called Pro-Choice....you know, "choice", that thing righties don't want women to have.... Now, care to answer the other questions or are they too inconvenient...??? WHY couldn't you answer them? Seems some posters in here find my questions too INCONVENIENT I still don't see a point... LOL...and I STILL don't see a poster who can answer my questions …..
In answer to the questions you asked: 1) It makes a difference in my acceptance of any argument in favor of abortion. 2) No. 3) No. Satisfied?
1) that's meaningless, no woman has to prove she benefited from having an abortion, not to you, not to anyone.......again no point. 2), 3) No to what?
FoxHastings said: ↑ 1) that's meaningless, no woman has to prove she benefited from having an abortion, not to you, not to anyone.......again no point. Opinion? No, it's a fact. If you think it isn't a fact you would be able to say why it isn't a fact. You may disregard it because it is, for you, INCONVENIENT... And you missed : ""2), 3) No to what?"""
LOL, nice dodge.....IF you could answer the questions you would have …. Answering "No" with nothing else means you have no argument, no reason for the "no", , no facts....but I knew that...
Well, I tried to get a "point" out of you but it isn't working...you just make statements you can't back up... I still don't see a point of any kind and if you're not willing to state one...welll..shrug
My point that you are incapable of understanding is this: IF having an abortion was statistically likely to help lift a woman out of poverty you can bet that abortion rights advocates (like you) would be touting those statistics to high heaven. Given that neither you nor others are doing that, one can assume that those statistics do not exist. Most certainly because the events they describe (abortion lifting women out of poverty) have never actually occurred.
LOL, hardly....It is not a statistic that can be counted since NO records are kept of women who have had abortions and what happened financially afterwards. Having a medical procedure is NOT public knowledge ...it's private. However, if a woman doesn't have a child, it's COMMON SENSE that she won't be spending money on it. And it STILL has nothing to do with her right to choose...
Yes but are there lives monitored forever after to see what happened to them? No. HERE is the WHOLE POST: LOL, hardly....It is not a statistic that can be counted since NO records are kept of women who have had abortions and what happened financially afterwards. Having a medical procedure is NOT public knowledge ...it's private. However, if a woman doesn't have a child, it's COMMON SENSE that she won't be spending money on it. And it STILL has nothing to do with her right to choose...
FoxHastings said: ↑ Yes but are there lives monitored forever after to see what happened to them? No. HERE is the WHOLE POST: LOL, hardly....It is not a statistic that can be counted since NO records are kept of women who have had abortions and what happened financially afterwards. Having a medical procedure is NOT public knowledge ...it's private. However, if a woman doesn't have a child, it's COMMON SENSE that she won't be spending money on it. And it STILL has nothing to do with her right to choose... And STILL you can't offer one word of refutation, can't address anything...LOL, saying something is "wrong" is NO argument ""However, if a woman doesn't have a child, it's COMMON SENSE that she won't be spending money on it."" So YOU think that NOT having a baby costs more than raising one...!!!! TOO funny....and I bet you have NO explanation for that ..
