Martha McSally Refuses to Answer Fox News Question After Attacking CNN Reporter For Same Question

Discussion in 'United States' started by MrTLegal, Jan 17, 2020.

  1. Market Junkie

    Market Junkie Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2016
    Messages:
    2,390
    Likes Received:
    1,920
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Marky gunna send sally's conservative hack ass PACKIN' this fall... :thumbsup: :democrat:
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  2. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,499
    Likes Received:
    4,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I'm partisan and I don't think he has done a damn thing wrong. He's just an old meanie that won an election he wasn't supposed to.
    What do you think the reaction would be to Trump being removed? Is violence likely?
     
  3. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No.
     
  4. Gatewood

    Gatewood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages:
    47,624
    Likes Received:
    48,666
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I see no point in indulging the fantasies of the political Left.
     
  5. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are too busy endulging every fantasy of the radical right.
     
    Last edited: Jan 19, 2020
  6. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,499
    Likes Received:
    4,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Really? You know we're all knuckle dragging deplorables. Why we propose by knocking our wimmin in the head so why wouldn't we raise a ruckus if this coup was successful?
     
  7. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are free to make that argument. I will not join you.
     
  8. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    15,838
    Likes Received:
    7,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, it wouldn't. Everybody on both sides of the aisle know Trump did this. It didn't change anything.
     
  9. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    15,838
    Likes Received:
    7,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Trump is a man with no morals and no respect. How exactly is he doing this?
     
  10. Heartburn

    Heartburn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Messages:
    13,499
    Likes Received:
    4,973
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would think not.
     
  11. Starjet

    Starjet Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    5,805
    Likes Received:
    1,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Fascism or Socialism, murder or suicide. One wants to rule your life for sake of the nation; the other for the sake of society, but neither wants to defend your right to live free—for your own sake, by your own effort, and in your own name. That’s the forbidden. What a fkd up world.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2020
  12. Robert E Allen

    Robert E Allen Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,041
    Likes Received:
    5,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Joe and Hunter? Whistle blower? Adam Schiff, DNC operatives who were operating in Ukraine?

    How about them witnesses?

    Factvis House Democrats didn't do their jobs. It's not the Senate's job to make up for their lack of evidence.

    I'm for all the witnesses or no witnesses.

    Remember the House can impeach again if they want.
     
  13. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,619
    Likes Received:
    8,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He has not broken any laws. Clear something up for me. Was there ever a date provided by the Congress that those funs were to be delivered to the Ukraine? A deadline?
    So if they were held up for a few days....what law exactly was violated? Was any favors done? See.....I don't see ANY high crimes or misdemeanors. I just see an attempted coup.
     
  14. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,619
    Likes Received:
    8,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He protects or sovereignty over our borders, he does what he can to protect the unborn, he has moved to protect religious liberty, he has increased the ability for families to provide for themselves through an enhanced economy, he shot down the first government mandate to purchase anything (health insurance). I could give you a whole lot more but the fact he has appointed many many non activist judges would be at the top of the list.
     
  15. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only individual from that group with information, either direct or second hand, about trump's actions around Ukraine (i.e. the reason for the trial) is the whistleblower. And he or she wishes to remain anonymous in order to protect his personal and professional safety.
     
  16. Robert E Allen

    Robert E Allen Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,041
    Likes Received:
    5,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    I don't believe there even is a whistleblower..

    I want to know everything about Ukraine or nothing.. it's been one sided enough already.

    The corruption of the Bidens is absolutely material to this case.

    If Joey was corrupt it totally clears, exonerates and vindicates Trump.
    Before you deny it, yes it sure the hell does.

    Actually Trump doesn't need exoneration in any way shape or form. He is innocent until proven guilty by the Senate.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2020
  17. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rofl.

    Nah, I'm going to go ahead and crush your argument.

    Even if Trump personally had explicit and undeniable evidence that Biden had committed a murder in Ukraine, then he STILL abused the power of his office by pressuring Ukraine to announce an investigation against his domestic political opponent by threatening to withhold hundreds of millions in military aid and a requested meeting.

    Even if trump had evidence (and let's be clear, he does not have any ****ing evidence), then he is still ethically bound to take that information to a domestic investigative agency and let them handle the investigation. Let them make the formal request for cooperation from the foreign government.

    If, and only if, there was evidence that the foreign government was unwilling to agree with the formal request for cooperation could Trump then place pressure and force their hand on cooperation and still avoid the very blatant and obvious conflict of interest that ultimately lies at the heart of his abuse of power for which he was impeached.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2020
  18. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,619
    Likes Received:
    8,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I would like you to establish a time deadline the money was to be delivered. Think that would be very important to your case. Sort of like did Pelosi have a time deadline to deliver the impeachment? Our tax payer dollars went toward the effort to establish those. Did she hold them up for personal gain?
     
  19. Starjet

    Starjet Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    5,805
    Likes Received:
    1,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're playing the Clinton game--depends upon what your "is" is.
     
  20. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your post is not especially relevant to the post you quoted or this thread.

    But no, holding up the articles did not provide a personal political benefit to Pelosi. But it did provide a politucal benefit to the country.
     
  21. yabberefugee

    yabberefugee Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2017
    Messages:
    20,619
    Likes Received:
    8,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That sounds like a dyslexic interpretation of what I said....sorry.
     
  22. jay runner

    jay runner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    Messages:
    16,319
    Likes Received:
    10,027
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    McSally is telling journo's to go get snapped.

    So what.
     
  23. Starjet

    Starjet Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    5,805
    Likes Received:
    1,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your reply proves my assertion.
     
  24. hawgsalot

    hawgsalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,339
    Likes Received:
    9,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Key to your theory is "pressuring" Ukraine says no pressure and you have hearsay saying they heard he was. You have a call that clearly doesn't pressure anything. You have no idea what evidence the Trump team has because you have yet to hear one witness from the Trump team so please stop acting like you have. A defense can call any damn witness they want and any attorney worth his salt is going to call all kinds of people laying out how Biden's hire was pay to play, starting with Hunter's ex partner who he screwed over.
     
  25. Robert E Allen

    Robert E Allen Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Messages:
    12,041
    Likes Received:
    5,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Nope, that is incorrect.. as far as impeachment goes it is not abuse of powee unless hecwas doing it for personal gain, for which there is no evidence. End of story..

    Now it is possible he did it for personal gain, Democrats however did not prove that..
     

Share This Page