No you never have. Your only argument is the government always lies about everything. You have never shown facts parallels or importance. That is really the only reason you claim to ignore people you wish for your repeated assertions to be taken seriously and hate when they are debunked.
WHat minutia as all you and he have done is to repeat hyperbole with no evidence. Where is your evidence?
I just quoted what the house said, in conclusion. How in the hell you can ignore this, tells me you are nothing but a blind debunker. You just ignored something important, that the committee itself found incoherences enough to suggest a possible conspiracy more than Oswald. And you go into denial? Sorry, no need to waste time arguing with such a mind. Like trying to teach a pig to sing. A waste of time, and it annoys the pig.
One of the primary symptoms of a US government boot licking troll is to constantly demand reverse burden of proof. The US government says ...... and has tons of evidence classified for over 5 decades that no one has a clue what that is, for "national security" reasons (i.e. to keep you warm and safe) now go prove they're wrong.
The part about a probable unspecified conspiracy was a quote. The part about incoherences ( which is not even a word ) was not a quote and that is not why they arrived at their conclusion I explain why they did and they did not find a problem with the warren commission. They had new evidence which was later debunked and proven false thus establishing the warren commission report as solid. Yes it is hard to teach fools how to cite evidence. You guys run from evidence all the time. Yes no need to waste time arguing with people smarter than you ( which would be me ) you lose every time as you just did.
No they do not reverse burden of proof it is you doing that the bootlicker of uneducated conspiracy fools. You never offer evidence for your claims you only assert and demand your lame assertions be accepted as truth. Where is your evidence?
There are 16 pages in front of you that are saturated in evidence. Maybe you are so overwhelmed with it all that you've been struck immobile in an unresponsive stupor?
I don't think anybody can "like" the place. All I can remember about it are a thousand inoculations (I exaggerate), marching, running, shooting, and the warning posters about Roses' Chicken Shack (in Waynesville) being "off limits". Smokin' Charly C-1-3! Hurry up and wait.
Because of my former level of security clearance I have proof that Oswald did not shoot Kennedy and that a certain government-affiliated agency assassinated him. But that proof is stored within the US government secrecy vault and for national security reasons I am pledged not to divulge any more information than I already have for fear of compromising the guarantee that the United States has given to each and every citizen with respect to their safety. Despite that, you make claims to the contrary with lame assertions that you want everyone to accept as truth yet you run from evidence all the time. Furthermore, you want to be taken seriously and hate it when you are debunked. So where is your evidence? I am still waiting for your evidence. Where is the evidence? Is it here, Soupy? Soup-ee? Is it here, or is it there? You don't seem sure to me, Louis.
Wrong. They have no evidence least of all posted by you or bobo the clown. I have clearly refuted and debunked claims made by conspiracy theorists with evidence. You willfully ignore evisence to cling to an absurd belief and you have not provided evidence of your claims because you cannot and are incapable of doing so. You are uninformed and know nothing about this subject
You never had a clearance and never served any where but mcdonalds you chicken hawk. And do not go claiming otherwise that is just a coward move by a scum bag. Grandiose lies are the cowards way out. I made no claims requiring evidence I consistently challenge your claims. Therefore you are lying I made no claims requiring evidence and made no statement of truth I challenge your claims and you RUN from the challenge You did and you have nothing. You made the statements providing evidence and I made a fair challenge asking you to demonstrate it. Now you are proving dishonesty and cowardice.because you will not do so. Bobo your chum has the same MO he never backs up his idiotic claims or even tries. I have only ever asked him to do so and I have never said anything requiring evidence. The burden of proof is on you little boy so start coughing it up
The US government doesn't give a flying **** about the safety of any American or any "guarantees" mandated by the Constitution. All of its actions/reactions serve the interest of its master(s), the .001% who bribe it to serve them at the expense of all ordinary Americans. Any illusion of "safety" is mere lip service. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - attributed to Benjamin Franklin
Wrong. Prove it. Where's your proof? Did you give me any proof? You didn't provide any proof. I am still waiting for your proof. Where is the proof? You don't have any proof because you are wrong. You only offer more hyperbole. Where's the evidence for your claim? Did you give any evidence? You didn't provide any evidence. I am still waiting for your evidence. Where's the evidence? You are just making lies which is a coward move by a scum bag, the cowards way out. I have clearly refuted and debunked your conspiracy claims about Oswald with evidence and I consistently challenge your claims and prove you are wrong. You are just being dishonest and cowardly because you know you have no proof or evidence. You never back up your idiotic claims or even try. You have nothing but imagination. The burden of proof is on you sonny, so turn off the Joan Wayne film marathon and get educated. I have solid proof that Oswald did not shoot Kennedy and you only offer adolescent fantasy. So prove that Oswald did it and show your evidence that I didn't have a security clearance > > > and then get your little bunny and .......
Yes I do. Grandiose claims are always by those who have no intelligent argument. It is a childish cop out and nothing more. If you have evidence you can present it if you cannot then you have none. You are saying you have it but cannot show it. EPIC FAILURE. You mentioned the saturation of evidence on these sixteen pages and as you well now it all proves you wrong. I made no specific claim requiring evidence YOU DID. Now quite the lies and back up your posts chicken hawk. IF you ever had such a clearance which allowed you to see such sensitive information then just admitting you saw it would be a criminal violation.
It is hyperbole and nothing more. Now what evidence do you have that it was impossible for Oswald to do what the evidence proves he did
Oh, you children and your conspiracy theories. You watch too much TV. Go to sleep now. You must be tired with all of that hopping up and down and spitting all over your mother's doilies. Show the proof of your Oswald conspiracy theory and evidence that I didn't have a security clearance. I am still waiting, poopy pants.
