Supreme Court to decide whether EC voters have a right to differ from state popular vote

I haven't seen the decision as of yet, nor the supporting and dissenting opinions of the justices.

I can only hope there will be sanity in all of these.

 

Gotcha...

 

Your vote in your state only effects matters within your state. What circumstances prevail in your state are entirely different from my state. I did not vote for Trump I didn't like, still don't personally, and he was going to win my state anyway. Voter turn out is different in each state depending on the circumstances within THAT state. Again it is total folly to project a tally of those 51 unique and separate elections and votes as what would be the outcome if we all voted in one big election. And the Democrats have done more to split this country apart, and are doing so with this bogus impeachment, than any party I have seen in my entire life. They do it on race, they do it on gender, they do it on economic status, they do it on moral beliefs, they do in of free speech and 2nd amendment rights.

 

never happened until Trump

 

never said there should only be once vote per state - I say that the electors should not be allowed to vote differently then the voters voted

 

Your accusation is false on its face. The truth will remain so regardless of your beliefs.

 

Okay

 

good, we agree

 

yes, the truth will remain regardless of yours or my beliefs, as the facts show Trump did this

 

Carry on.

 

the truth is on my side, so of course I will

 

They should be bound by the vote in their state, that's correct.

 

You mean you really don't know?

 

I had not heard, what is it you want to share with us?

 

The left rely on congenital liars like madcow on PMSLSD for their "news."

In response to a defamation suit, her answer is that even tho she claims to be a journalist that nothing she says on air should be regarded as the truth.

So, it's not odd that leftists believe that Trump said, "do me a favor and investigate the bidens."
It never happened, but the left absolutely believe it's true because they eat the leftist msm crap sandwiches like it's candy. They would never dream of actually reading the text of what was said.

 

I think you mean ManCow and that is a republican show

 

I just gotta ask... Is saying the opposite of something your way of arguing? You could have literally pointed at a Pepsi can and said "That's a bottle of water" and it would have made more sense.

 

guess you have never seen ManCow.. I have never seen MadCow... so were even I guess

 

They eat it right up and when it turns out to be bogus they run to the next crap sandwich like it never happened.

I would think that after sham after sham is proven wrong, they would expect more from their media and politicians but nope-never seems to happen.

 

with Trump as the rights leader of the pack, hard to believe a conservative could even post that with a stright face

 

Such a true quote... And if anyone needs proof, all they have to do is turn to the Senate and watch how they shut the liberals down.

 

So very true.

 

Even if you believe that--and I do not--do you seriously believe that those who agree with you are represented by two-thirds of both the House and Senate, plus three-fourths (currently, 3 of the state legislatures?

That, after all, is what would be required for a constitutional amendment.

 

Mitch McConnell may be pretty skilled at shutting down the Democrats (which, for the most part, is to say: liberals), but he is probably no better than Chuck Schumer would be at shutting down the opposition.

It just happens that McConnell is in the majority; so he is able to do that which Schumer only wishes that he could do.

 

9-0, electors have to follow the law of their state