Unarmed woman is shot by Police in Capitol. The People Who Scream ‘Police Brutality’ Don’t Care.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by chris155au, Jan 11, 2021.

  1. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your not putting a dent in MY point:

    Cops do not shoot violent fascist busy killing them, while not having a problem shooting BLACK AND WHITE MEN fleeing!

    :roflol: Even though you said this:
     
  2. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Their First Amendment rights were not even under threat! They could have moved down the road and protested, but they refused! They didn't even originally have permission to stage a protest in the park!

    They refused to move on, and some attacked police.

    That's because you are under the delusion that they were nothing but perfectly peaceful and compliant with police orders! :roflol:

    We agree!

    Your sources do not CLAIM that there were no violent protesters.

    You mean body cams?
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  3. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're pretending that you have no opinion on the matter! Obviously you disagree with my opinion and have an alternative opinion! It shouldn't be hard to understand! Here, I'll make it simple:

    My opinion: He didn't incite the riot.

    Your opinion: He did.

    It WAS a call to fight, just like one million politicians have done before him! :roflol:

    The word "responsible" doesn't even appear in the article! :roflol:

    Again, they fought PHYSICALLY, which Trump did not specify. Simple!

    He didn't address the rioters and most of the protesters were peaceful. Simple!
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2021
    Ddyad likes this.
  4. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Having trouble replying to my replies to you? There's about a thousand! And what questions didn't I answer?

    "Dah?"
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  5. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not about your point. It's about my point:
    Cops do not shoot violent white fascist busy killing them,
    while not having a problem shooting a black man fleeing.


    Donald not being part of the group who fought at the capitol, still means he is directly connected to it, and so responsible for his part of the people who riot.
    You even sourced that it is.
     
  6. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're just moving goalpost away from that cops beat up peaceful protesters, to if protesters have a right to defend their 1st amendment rights against an oppressive government, by now moving it to yet an other thing.

    I asked you to source that the beating away of peaceful protesters had to do with extending the perimeter, and you're not sourcing a thing.... and you're now again not responding.

    No prove.

    I got prove the independent press saying it was so, while you only got an unfounded opinion of a biased cop.
     
  7. notme

    notme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    42,019
    Likes Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is exactly like that. You either prove your opinion you brought up or you forfeit it.
    I will not respond again to this without a source proving your opinion.

    You sourced it was a call for action. I agree.

    So what

    You failed to prove what Donald means. Simple.
    You either prove your opinion you brought up or you forfeit it.
    I will not respond again to this without a source proving your opinion.

    Did he exclude them when he expressed his love for his supporters at the end of the day?
     
  8. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’ve yet to hear a coherent question.
     
  9. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Verbally harassing and attacking people with clubs and pepper spray are not the same thing. You’re totally irrational in the comparison. Let’s compare the video. One demonstration takes place in a legal area, the other is attacking people in a restricted area.
     
  10. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I didn't make that comparison, and anyway, the Jan 6 scum were NOT attacking Congress people with clubs and pepper spray, and it's Congress people we are talking about. I'm simply challenging your claim that the BLM protesters "were totally non threatening to congressional peoples." More importantly, they were attacking and killing ordinary people for MONTHS, who are obviously no less important than Congress people. But of course, you will continue to downplay these actions. It's quite telling that you're ignoring the effects on ordinary people, and focusing on the effects on Congress people because of how directly they were threatened by the scum on Jan 6. How convenient! And if you want to make it about threats to cops and attacking cops, I win that argument too. BLM protests were a MUCH bigger threat to cops than Jan 6, which of course was only one day!
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2021
    Ddyad likes this.
  11. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What questions didn't I answer?
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  12. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yep, just like a few Trump supporters were opportunistic looters and the vast majority were demonstrating peacefully on Jan 6.

    What the hell do you mean they never brought it out? As in they never reported on the rioting on Jan 6? Are you serious? They reported on it a HELL of alot more than the left wing media reported on BLM rioting last year, when they focused much more on the 'mostly peaceful protests.'
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  13. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you actually think that you don't have an opinion on the matter! How funny! :roflol:

    Obviously you disagree with my opinion and have an alternative opinion! It shouldn't be hard to understand! Here, I'll make it simple:

    My opinion: He didn't incite the riot.

    Your opinion: He did.

    You either prove YOUR opinion or you forfeit it.

    Yep. Is there some sort of problem with a call for action? It seems like a pretty normal thing for a politician to do.

    You're responding to something I said which didn't contain anything about what Trump means. Again, they fought PHYSICALLY, which Trump did not specify. Simple!

    Irrelevant. He didn't address the rioters and most of the protesters were peaceful. Simple!
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  14. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're the one who brought up the 1st Amendment issue, not me! The problem is, that their First Amendment rights were not even under threat!

    And yes, protesters and indeed ALL people, have a right to defend their 1st amendment rights, and indeed ALL rights against an oppressive government. So then you must agree that a gun owner has the right to shoot and kill any government officer who tries to take away their most basic gun, not even an assault rifle. I guess you might argue that an assault rifle should be able to be taken away after a law is passed.

    It's VERY simple! If extending the perimeter means that people need to be cleared from an area, and those people refuse to move on, how can the perimeter be extended?

    You're correct! There is no proof that they were nothing but perfectly peaceful and compliant with police orders! :roflol:

    Your sources only say that peaceful protesters were cleared, which is a FACT! Your sources do not CLAIM that there were no violent protesters. Simple!

    You have no proof that he is an unreliabe witness. Meanwhile, you say that your source from the same hearing is totally reliable when you know NOTHING about him! Double standard! :roflol:
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  15. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh, it's about YOUR point? So only YOUR point is relevant? This is about our differing opinions! You say that cops have no problem shooting a black man fleeing, which proves nothing because they also have no problem shooting WHITE MEN fleeing! Your argument is UNBELIEVABLY BAD! :roflol:

    Yes, so Trump is not PART of the Proud Boys, just like the peaceful protesters on January 6 were not PART of the violent protesters. Simple!

    It all goes back to what I said earlier :

    "You only sourced that people who attended the protest had guns. You did NOT source that they were fascists attacking the cops! They could have been peaceful protesters."
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2021
    Ddyad likes this.
  16. logical1

    logical1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    25,426
    Likes Received:
    8,068
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Justice for Ashli!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Time to bring her cold blooded killer to justice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    21Bronco and Ddyad like this.
  17. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,268
    Likes Received:
    25,271
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The killer was probably just following orders.
     
  18. logical1

    logical1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    25,426
    Likes Received:
    8,068
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then charge them too!!!!
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  19. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,268
    Likes Received:
    25,271
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Will never happen.
     
  20. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not after you broke into the capital and beat on cops.
     
  21. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Exactly. It’s called following a sworn duty. It worked. More lives were saved then taken by this single action. . This woman paid the price for being a fool.
     
  22. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As in they never reported on the rioting on Jan 6?
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2021
    Ddyad likes this.
  23. chris155au

    chris155au Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2017
    Messages:
    41,176
    Likes Received:
    4,365
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You actually think that every protester who was there did that? :roflol:
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  24. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    442 have been arrested. It would have been more if not for the efforts of the police and crowded conditions. Deniers are trying real hard not to look at all the video. After all, Trump, Shawn and Tucker didn’t give their permission to do that. Just yak and make up crappolla.
     
  25. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,147
    Likes Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You tell me. Fix is FOS 90% of the time.
     

Share This Page