Your Electoral College Predictions

Did you listen to the Pennsylvania Legislature hearing on the election? That was pretty eye opening to say the least...

 

I must have missed the eye-opening parts. Perhaps you could share highlights. Meanwhile, did you read the federal appeals court decision rejecting Trump's appeal? It came out today, and was written by Judge Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed to the court by Trump, and supported by the other two members as well (Bush appointees):

"Calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

I'm still waiting for you to demonstrate your confidence in the outcome by confirming our bet.

 

Same as before. Long on accusations, short on any actual evidence. Empty theatrics, to be as generous as possible.

 

gfm7175 found it "eye-opening". His failure to take me up on my bet suggests that he hasn't really believed Trump had a chance, and these theatrics in Pennsylvania may have finally brought him back to reality. I'm praying for him.

 

Here's something else that's "eye-opening":

Officials overseeing the election in Wisconsin's largest county on Saturday accused ballot tabulation observers for President Trump of trying to obstruct the recount.
Milwaukee County Clerk George Christenson said that in some cases observers were objecting to nearly every ballot pulled to count, The Associated Press reported.

"It's not our job to train their observers on what they're observing," he said. "They clearly don't know what they're doing and so they keep asking questions. And we've said to the Trump campaign, you need to tell your people what you're looking for here because they're objecting to every ballot."

Christenson said the complaints were putting the recount behind schedule, and many observers were breaking rules by interrupting vote counters with questions or objections. He called the behavior "unacceptable."

 

Did you hear the part about 1.8M mail ballots requested, but 2.5M mail ballots were counted?? How can you count 700k MORE ballots than were requested, let alone returned? Why would the State take that info down from their website?? Luckily that info has been archived...

 

Something else that's "eye-opening"... Apparently thousands of absentee ballots in Dane County are very suspect... sounds like those ballots, besides likely being fraudulent, were completed in a manner that violates State law... I'm willing to bet that it's just the tip of the iceburg of all the fraud that went on here...

 

Because it is not true - just fake info being used

3m+ sent out
2.5+ returned

I was monitoring the #s daily in Oct/Nov and that was what it was on 11/3. See link below

https://electproject.github.io/Early-Vote-2020G/PA.html

 

Were you prepared?

 

To Dems losing the senate, losing 10-13 house seats, losing the entire down ballot vote, yes. To the magnitude of the dems' election fraud, absolutely not. You got me, guilty as charged.

 

Still claiming there was fraud, but somehow down ballots got left out of the fraud. LOL.

And good on down ballots. It's never good when 1 party gets all 3 areas of gov't.

 

The dems' devastating down ballot losses did not happen in Democrat infested/run cities of Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia and Milwaukee where all the dem cheating and election fraud took place
The dems' devastating down ballot losses took place in swing/right-leaning districts where the Dems were not able to cheat and commit election fraud.

 

What magically force allowed them to "cheat" for the presidency but mysteeeeeeeeriously blocked them from doing the exact same thing down ballot? As if the complete lack of evidence weren't embarrassing enough, now you guys are trying to cram through this brainfart on top of it all.

 

No - they only cheated in 4 cities. Cities that all have something in common. Though how Trump did better in 2020 in Phila vs 2016 and about the same in Detroit with all that "cheating: is pretty impressive.........

 

No signature verification of illegally harvested ballots which signature envelopes were illegally discarded by democrats in democrat run and democrat infested cities with the history of election fraud.

Trump increased his margin in absolutely every single demographic category except for the dead people who were all for Biden and except in those 4 democrat run, fully democrat controlled cities
.

 

You ran away from my question. What was to stop them from doing the exact same thing for the rest of the ballot? This is just pathetic. Have you guys tried, I dunno, producing some evidence instead of just making **** up as you go along?

 

I thought it was obvious, those areas were not infested with democrats, those were swing/republican leaning areas. The democrats were not allowed to harvest the ballots, dispose of signature verification, dump illegal ballots in the middle of the night etc outside the areas where they had absolute control.

 

PA & MI suburbs were the difference vs 2016, not Detroit/Phila. A lot of suburban women who voted for Trump in 2016, voted for Biden in 2020

Did they mention that yet? Oh wait - that goes against the 4 cities had massive fraud lies....

 

You claim you're "willing to bet", but you haven't responded to the bet I offered you. I don't think you really believe anything you've saying, you're just vainly hoping.

 

Yes, I did. And I learned why this was reported. Maybe you should stop assuming every reporting anomaly is the product of fraud, and instead investigate to see if there's an explanation. To demonstrate you're interested in truth, post the answer when you find it, along with your admission you'd jumped to conclusions. That will be refreshing.

So far, there has been no widespread fraud found. That is, unless we count Trump and Rudy's fraudulent assertions.

 

You are still running away. Your claim was that they were able to do it for the presidential vote but maaaaaaaaaaaagically prevented from doing anything else on the ballot. You have failed to defend your purely religious declarations of voter fraud. Stick to your blind faith all you want. Stop whining that the rest of us require evidence. It is beyond pathetic at this point.

 

Um, no.

 

No so you might need to provide , you know, evidence

 

Yours, lol.

 

GREAT Prediction.

Worthy of a *Bump* on Biden's Inauguration Day...