Black people are visably differentiated group that is entitled to the same rights and privledges as every one else. I do not have a problem with that. It is the gays who hi-jacked the ligitament movement of civil rights and made it a perverse joke on what rights actually are.
Didnt take long for the Genetic to be compared to the Choice. Thanks for bringing that in fast Rahl, I have to go have dinner in a couple minutes and didn't want to miss it.
Not when you consider it in line with the Quote that accompanied it. Which children would these be Rahl that were mentioned as if they accompany all Gay unions? And if you feel it is irrelevant, then perhaps you should write those who gave this speech and tell them so.
What difference does it make? Side note: there's no such thing as the sanctity of marriage, not when Kardashians can marry for a whopping 72 days and then quit.
It is the primary reason for marriage, to produce the next generation through normal means. Not by changing definitions.
adopted children of course. or surrogate children. the point is moot though, since children are not a requirement of marriage.
I would say that's the libertarian side of me who thinks of a laissez-faire lifestyle. Aren't "real Americans" about not infringing on the rights of others, since only you are allowed to judge who's a real American?
uh, in case you weren't aware, same sex marriage exists in NUMEROUS countries, including the US. So, it's obviously what marriage "is".
Do you have any science headline that proves me wrong? Wheres the gene Rahl, show us all the story of the century...that we all somehow missed.
no it isn't. procreation is not a requirement of marriage. the definition of marriage has changed NUMEROUS times throughout it's existence.