Religious warfare never leads to good things. Islam is, actually, better than what it replaced, whether in Arabia or India or some parts of Africa. At least Muslims were not down with the idea of burning widows on their husbands' funeral pyre so that she could not walk away with most of his money like an Arab widow, per the Qur'an, is permtted to do.
So if a group of people start practicing Satanic child sacrifice (using your children), you're cool with that?
You are aware that actual; practicing Muslims have practicing Christians out-numbered world-wide, and would take more than our lifetimes to wipe out, right? Of course, you are also assuming that there is a public will to do so. If you think that that does not matter, them you are not really bringing your "A" game to this contest, and really need to sit down and read, cover-to-cover, Carl von Clausewitz' vom Kriege.]
Don't be ridiculous. NATO alone could handle it, without even considering the potential input of the Russians, Chinese and Indians.
Again, you have denonstrated that you know sod-all about the military. Do you know why not even Yamamoto wanted to invade the American west coast? The treaty that ass boy Watson was writing about might not have been what the lying pile of poo claims.
Yes actually I do. Sadly it has nothing to do with the point under discussion, which I am correct about.
Horse feathers. That document that idiot boy Watson and the fat turd in the video cite specifies that countries will be allowed to maintain such "armaments" as a re usefull in selt defence. Now, why did Yamamoto not want to invade us?
Yeah, so what's your point? A Satanic religion will always be a Satanic religion regarless if they have any and all other religions outnumbered. My point here is that we have a collective need to wipe out any of these terrorist cells and of their minions here inside America before its too late. Clinton allowed those illegal 9/11 terrorists to set up camp here in the states to where they were able to take flight instructions and to get wired money from the ******* states to fund their terrorist plot. Assuming there is a public will to do so? Wow, do you really have your head so far up yer poop chute that you think people are apathetic about the real terrorist threat of these *******s? I get the feeling that i'm having a debate here with an OWS loser.
Since when did NATO ask for public permission anyway. Islam is bad and should be wiped out. Take out Talmudic Judaism at the same time.
I've also served overseas in Iraq...twice. After 9/11 one of my good friends in Key Club was from Oman and we had to guard her from bigots like you. The issues I have with Islam is not with the core tenets of the religion, but with the extremists who taint the ideology. Then again, I hold a distaste for extremists of any ideology. Why?
Clearly you know nothing of Islam. The core tenant of Islam is to spread Islam across the entire world by deception or the sword as applicable, at which point you will bow down to Mohammed's home town 5 times a day, or pay a special tax. This is the core tenant of Islam. It's a ridiculous primitive tribal crock, with a veneer of religion to fool people who are fooled by such things. Talmudic Judaism is no better. Full of rules about when it's acceptable to cheat the "Goyim".
<<<mod edit>>> flaming The last thing this country or the world needs is a religious war. The UN would resist us in that. Every citizen in the countries threatened would resist us. The only way to destroy Islam would be a nuclear war that would destroy mankind in general.
Citation needed. Islam was the first religion to codify women's rights to own property or seek a divorce. Most of the horror stories you like to cite are the result of the corruption of Sharia by the insertion of tribal crap, like FGM and the death penalty for adultery.
You're right, but it's still a morality issue. If the tables were turned and a Christian business owner refused service to a Muslim, Liberals and Democrats alike would be all over the story. And you would see the story in the news. You won't see this story on news agencies, except maybe Fox, and since they are number one in all time slots on cable news, I guess a lot of people would see it.
If it were a Christian business owner refusing service to a Muslim, I'm sure you would be arguing a different story. Why do you keep using "redneck" to define white people, as it's clearly what you're doing?
I know quite a bit about Islam and its history. The extremists have hijacked it and have tainted the world to it. I'm Christian, but I don't allow my passions, prejudices, or interests to betray me and lead me down the road to fanaticism, extremism, and bigotry.
There is still no proof that anything wrong happened. We do not have statements from any of the parties involved. That is to say that this whole thread lacks any substance. The dimwit who posted the video to You Tube is not even standing by and defending his position. The video is gone. There is the possibility that the soldier had been drinking and decided totake out his frustrations on the Muslims closest at hand. That is grounds anywhere in the world to deny service.
Stop with the nonsense. I'll leave you with the video showing the owner and the manager of the gas station holding an apology sign in their dirty little fingers. if she wasn't in the wrong in refusing the soldier service at her station then she wouldn't be apologizing. http://www.wdsu.com/news/local-news...ion/-/9853400/14751860/-/psy2ycz/-/index.html